Kushindwa Kwa Romney: Nini Sababu?

Romney is the weakest presidential candidate in american history, he is a looser that is why he use loser hilary clinton as his step up, hilary told him he is wasting his money, he complain that obama is to apologetic , why he asks obama to apologies to him on his add related to the campaign he works which lead to some lays offs. Tanzania for obama or cain who is no more.

Romney sio weak kama unavyodhani.
Angalia hapa...
Obama alijua kabisa kuwa safari hii amapata mpinzani mkali, ndio maana Obama akalazimika kufanya maamuzi ya 'ajabu-ajabu'.
  • Obama aliamua kuunga mkono ushoga ili apate kura (Obama hakuunga mkono ushoga mwaka 2008 !!!)
  • Obama aliamua kuunga mkono utoaji mimba ili apate kura (Obama hakuunga mkono utoaji mimba mwaka 2008 !!)
  • Obama badala ya kunadi sera zake, aliishia kulaumu wingi wa matangazo ya TV ya kampeni za Romney !!
  • Obama badala ya kunadi sera zake aliishia kushambulia kusikiliza na kushambulia hotuba za Romney !!
  • Romney alilaani kitendo cha ugaidi Libya (Benghazi), Obama akaishia kuwaomba radhi magaidi na kulaumu filamu !!

Hivi ingekuwaje kama Obama asingeshabikia ushoga na utoaji mimba ?? Angepata kura asilimia ngapi ??
Obama pamoja na kuunga mkono ushoga na utoajimimba, kaishia kupata 51%, chupu-chupu ashindwe!!!


  • Obama alijua kuwa safari hii uchaguzi ngoma nzito, ndio maana alitoa machozi kwenye kampeni (hakutoa machozi mwaka 2008 !!!)
  • Obama hakuamini hata matokeo yalivyotoka, akatoa machozi wakati wa kuwashukuru wana-kamati wa kampeni zake (hakufanya hivyo mwaka 2008 !!!)

Romney anasimamia maadili mema na ukweli. Haungi mkono ushoga wala utoaji mimba.
Pamoja na msimamo mkali dhidi ya ushoga na utoaji mimba
Romney kaungwa mkono na watu wengi sana.
 
Mnamshangaa Romney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Mbona sisi Wa TZ ndo tunaongoza kuchagua chama dhaifu zaifu na viongozi zaifiu zaifu!
 
Mnamshangaa Romney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Mbona sisi Wa TZ ndo tunaongoza kuchagua chama dhaifu zaifu na viongozi zaifiu zaifu!

Naona hii ndio imekuwa 'fashion' kwa sasa, yaani kuna 'fashion' ya kuchagua viongozi 'fake'.

Angalia hapa :-
  • Uingereza walimchagua David Cameron (jamaa ndio kinara wa sera za ushoga)
  • Ufaransa walimchagua Holande (anaunga mkono ushoga)
  • Marekani wamemchagua Obama (anaunga mkono ushoga ) !!!

Kaazi kweli-kweli !!!!!
 
Media ya USA ilikuwa inajua toka day one kwamba Romney hashindi, lakini kwa sababu they had to make money wakaanza uongo mwingi wa kuwa Race is tight, ndio maana ya Capitalism ni kutengeneza faida popote pale kwa kugeuza geuza habari ingawa ukweli unafahamika. Le Mutuz!!

Mkuu Zakumi thread nzuri ila mengi nimeshayazungumzia kwenye ile thread nyingine. Ila ningependa kuzumngumzia point ya Mkuu W. J. Malecela kuhusu USA media. The election was normal, but the media tried to make it as a sporting event. From Fox News to CNN, they all got it wrong.

On the night of the election, CNN concentrated more in Florida. Whenever I switched to CNN they were talking about Florida. At the end of the night, Florida did not play any role in Obama winning the election. Kuna media nyingine zili-concentrate in Florida, Virginia and Ohio.

No media took seriously Michigan, PA, New Hampshire, Colorado and Wisconsin. Lakini kama Romney angeshinda, then alitakiwa ashinde hizi States. Hata baada ya Obama kushinda Michigan, PA, Colorado and Wisconsin bado media zilikuwa zimejikita Florida just to keep the headings, even though it was very likely that Obama angeshinda Iowa and Ohio and won't need Florida.

Kuhusu Virginia ilionekana wazi either the media wanted the State to be in the headlines or hawakupitia kabisa recent demographic changes in the state. Kama watu wengi vijijini (in Virginia) appeared this time to vote for Obama and Obama was holding on in the urban areas how comes Romeny could have won in that state?

The media got it really bad this time or they were trying to make money by misleading the public. It is stunning to hear some media, which during the campaigns boasted about how likely Obama was to be defeated, now minimize the significance of Obama's victory and suggest he does not have a mandate.

In winning re-election, Barack Obama secured more electoral votes than any Republican presidential candidate in the last 24 years. Contrary to the media prediction, Obama also won the popular vote. He won in states such as Ohio, Virginia, Colorado and Iowa, states that Republicans won with equal ease in prior elections.

The media trumpeted throughout the campaign season, no president since FDR has won re-election with unemployment over 7.2%. Now that one has, they want to deny the magnitude of that victory and the reality it reflects - that the American people, nonetheless still frustrated by their stagnant economy, endorsed a continuation of the Democratic policies.
 
Nadhani wapiga kura wa Obama walichafanya chaguo lao mapema. Sijuhi hiyo ilitokana na uzuri, nyota, urefu au nini? Walifanya hivyo zamani hata kabla ya kampeni azijaanza rasmi. Team ya Obama ilichofanya ni kuwahimiza kwenda kupiga kura.

Kwenye debate ya kwanza, Romney alifanya vizuri. Kufanya kwake vizuri kulihamasisha republicans lakini sio kuchukua wapiga kura wa Obama.

Baada ya debate ya kwanza sikusikia washabiki wa Obama kubadilisha mawazo, bali walisisitiza kuwa Obama atafanya vizuri baadaye.

Zakumi
Pamoja na kuwa Obama hakufanya vizuri kwenye debate ya kwanza; hilo wengi hawakulijali; utakubaliana nami katika historia ya marekani wengi walikuwa hawajawahi kupata mtikisiko wa kiuchumi; Obama amefanya kazi kubwa sana kuhakikisha uchumi unakaa sawa; hii ni hali ambayo tumeishuhudia na sio kuisoma kwenye magazeti; Romney alitumia uwezo wake kifedha na wall street kuhakikisha anashinda; CPAC peke yao wametumia $milioni 400 chini ya Karl Rove kumpiga vita Obama; Kilichomrudisha Obama madarakani ni utendaji wake wa kazi na vinginevyo!

Chama
Gongo la mboto DSM
 
This is absolutely true; nimepita leo maeneo ya Detroit nimekutana na bango likitangaza "Activists wanted" nilipolisoma karibu linasema "Get paid between 75-100 a day kwa kuandikisha watu wanaotaka kupiga kura (kuwahamaisha).

Hukuchangamkia tenda!

Chama
Gongo la mboto DSM
 
Mkuu Zakumi thread nzuri ila mengi nimeshayazungumzia kwenye ile thread nyingine. Ila ningependa kuzumngumzia point ya Mkuu W. J. Malecela kuhusu USA media. The election was normal, but the media tried to make it as a sporting event. From Fox News to CNN, they all got it wrong.

On the night of the election, CNN concentrated more in Florida. Whenever I switched to CNN they were talking about Florida. At the end of the night, Florida did not play any role in Obama winning the election. Kuna media nyingine zili-concentrate in Florida, Virginia and Ohio.

No media took seriously Michigan, PA, New Hampshire, Colorado and Wisconsin. Lakini kama Romney angeshinda, then alitakiwa ashinde hizi States. Hata baada ya Obama kushinda Michigan, PA, Colorado and Wisconsin bado media zilikuwa zimejikita Florida just to keep the headings, even though it was very likely that Obama angeshinda Iowa and Ohio and won't need Florida.

Kuhusu Virginia ilionekana wazi either the media wanted the State to be in the headlines or hawakupitia kabisa recent demographic changes in the state. Kama watu wengi vijijini (in Virginia) appeared this time to vote for Obama and Obama was holding on in the urban areas how comes Romeny could have won in that state?

The media got it really bad this time or they were trying to make money by misleading the public. It is stunning to hear some media, which during the campaigns boasted about how likely Obama was to be defeated, now minimize the significance of Obama's victory and suggest he does not have a mandate.

In winning re-election, Barack Obama secured more electoral votes than any Republican presidential candidate in the last 24 years. Contrary to the media prediction, Obama also won the popular vote. He won in states such as Ohio, Virginia, Colorado and Iowa, states that Republicans won with equal ease in prior elections.

The media trumpeted throughout the campaign season, no president since FDR has won re-election with unemployment over 7.2%. Now that one has, they want to deny the magnitude of that victory and the reality it reflects - that the American people, nonetheless still frustrated by their stagnant economy, endorsed a continuation of the Democratic policies.

EMT,

Media wana pollsters wao. Na hawa waliangalia data za 2010. Ukitumia data hizi na ambazo Romney alitumia kwenye kampeni yake, ushindi ulikuwa wa Romney.

Waliotumia data za 2008 waliona kuwa Obama anashinda kirahisi tena walitabiri ushindi wa Obama toka January 2012.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMT
Huyo angeleta mambo yake ya kibongo. Angechukua pesa na kwenda chini ya mti na kuanza kuorodhesha majina.

Zakumi
Daah hii kali yaani humuamini mwanakijiji kiasi hiki? Kampeni zilikuwa kali sana Romney alikuwa anatumia media; Obama alikuwa boots palikuwa patamu sana.

Chama
Gongo la mboto DSM
 
Dear Mr Mitt Romney,

You took the Universe of potential voters and then you started skimming them off by groups and here is who you lost out:

1) voters who lost trust in you when you refused to release your tax returns.

2) voters who were offended by your wife because she referred to them as "you people".

3)
voters who wanted more details on what tax deductions you planned to cut.

4) 47%'ers who do not, by the way, want free stuff.

5) woman voters who feared losing health care choices.

6) 3 million women who use Planned Parenthood as a last result for healthcare.

7) working women voters who work 3 jobs to support their children who were offended by your wife comparing her privileged lifestyle to theirs.

8) People of color who took offense to your campaigns constant racially tainted criticism – for your information FYI, the President is NOT lazy.

9) your constantly telling voting groups what you thought they wanted to hear and flip-flopping at the speed of light.

10) voters embarrassed were by your behavior at the Olympics.

11) voters who don't believe corporations are people.

12) anxious mothers with children who have preexisting conditions whose health care you planned to cut.

13) environmentally concerned voters who long to have a fact based conversation about climate change before implementing the Keystone pipeline.

14) voters offended by your politicizing of the Benghazi tragedy.

15) Voters who feared for their children's future when your wife casually mentioned that oh –by the way we will get rid of public education.

16) Voters astounded by your completely baseless belief that more tax cuts for the upper income groups would create jobs .

17) voters concerned about your schizophrenic claim that government does not create jobs while criticizing the current administration for not creating jobs.

18) Muslim American voters who you offended by your uneducated views of the on-going Palestinian refugee crises.

19) Woman voters who have suffered the humiliation of rape wanting you to come to their defense when your Vice President of choice declares rape a form of contraception.

20) voters who got tired of your lies about Jeep plants moving to China, only they weren't or President Obama changing welfare requirements –only he didn't.

21) Voters who think it is a privilege to pay taxes to this great nation of ours and take offense to the Swiss bank accounts and tax loopholes.

22) Voters who were scared to death to let the NeoCons back into power and create more opportunities for war profits.

I would go on, but I believe you are so blinded by a sense of privilege and FOX Newsitis that I should stop wasting my time trying to help you figure this out.


Swadaktaa!
 
Romney's get-out-the-vote operation was comically inept. Obama barely prepared for the first debate. Romney spent $25,000 on victory fireworks. And more!
The presidential election is over, but the real story behind the race is only just emerging. After months of enough spin to make a washing machine envious, members of the campaigns are starting to let down their guard and dish some dirt to media outlets. From Mitt Romney's embarrassingly ineffective get-out-the-vote operation to President Obama's peevish attitude toward the debates, post-election autopsies have given political junkies a lot to mull over before they, yes, turn to the 2016 race. Here, eight behind-the-scenes revelations from the campaign:


1. Romney was shellshocked by Obama's victory
Romney genuinely believed that he would become the nation's 45th president, and was "shellshocked" by his landslide loss. "I don't think there was one person who saw this coming," one senior adviser told Jan Crawford at CBS News. Why was Team Romney so certain of victory? They simply did not believe that younger voters and minorities would turn out the way they did in 2008. "As a result," says Crawford, "they believed that the public/media polls were skewed" in Obama's favor, and rejiggered them to show Romney with "turnout levels more favorable to Romney." In essence, Romney "unskewed" the polls, mirroring widely mocked moves by conservatives to show their candidate with a lead, epitomized by the now-infamous website UnskewedPolls.com. Romney's defenders say he had plausible reasons to believe Obama's turnout would be lower; less charitable commentators say Romney and his aides were stuck in a conservative media echo chamber at odds with reality.

2. Obama's get-out-the-vote operation was amazing
Obama's ground game relied on "an extraordinarily sophisticated database packed with names of millions of undecided voters and potential supporters," says The New York Times. The database allowed Obama's army of field workers to target new voters, register them, and get them to the polls. On Election Day, it became clear that the Obama campaign had altered "the very nature of the electorate, making it younger and less white," says The Times. "The power of this operation stunned Mr. Romney's aides on election night, as they saw voters they never even knew existed turn out in places like Osceola County, Fla."



3. Romney's get-out-the-vote operation was hopeless
The Romney campaign "came up with a super-secret, super-duper vote monitoring system that was dubbed Project Orca," says Byron York at The Washington Examiner. The so-called "mega-app for smartphones" was supposed to "link the more than 30,000 operatives and volunteers involved in get-out-the-vote efforts," in a bid to coordinate everyone's efforts and maximize turnout, say Maggie Haberman and Alexander Burns at Politico. But Project Orca was a complete and utter failure. The program crashed on Election Day, which meant that "workers on the ground didn't know what doors to knock on," say Haberman and Burns. The campaign was flying blind, relying on CNN and other media outlets to track turnout. "The end result," says John Ekdahl, a Romney campaign worker, at Ace of Spades, "was that 30,000+ of the most active and fired-up volunteers were wandering around confused and frustrated when they could have been doing anything else to help."

4. Obama underestimated Romney's debating prowess
In the run-up to the first presidential debate, Obama "displayed little concern" about the challenge ahead of him, and "his impatience with the exercise was evident," says The Times. He ended up walking "into a trap that Mr. Romney's advisers had anticipated: His antipathy toward Mr. Romney — which advisers described as deeper than what Mr. Obama had felt for John McCain in 2008 — led the incumbent to underestimate his opponent as he began moving to the center before the debate audiences of millions of television viewers." As a result, the president spent the rest of the campaign making up for "what was arguably the most dismal night of Mr. Obama's political career."



5. Romney was desperate for money
"The GOP nominee emerged late last spring from a long and bruising Republican primary season more damaged than commonly realized," say Sara Murray and Patrick O'Connor at The Wall Street Journal. Romney "had spent so much money winning the nomination" that he had to spend the first weeks and months of the general campaign touring fundraising meccas in "California, Texas, and New York — none of which were important political battlegrounds." Romney raised about $800 million, but "paid a deep political price," giving the Obama campaign a large window of time to "define the Republican candidate on its terms."

6. Romney was beholden to Donald Trump
Perhaps the Romney campaign's "most fatal mistake was its tortured, 16-month quest to win the affection of rank-and-file conservatives via their most boisterous mouthpiece — at the expense of everything else," says McKay Coppins at BuzzFeed. That would be Donald Trump, the country's most famous birther. "Trump's appeal to the Republican base was undeniable," and Romney spent a fair amount of effort winning his endorsement. But the "Trump stunt did not end up sending Tea Partiers marching en masse to the primary polls," and Romney's new ties to birtherism "became, increasingly, a political headache." The Obama campaign linked Trump with Romney at every opportunity, and Trump "required constant maintenance by the campaign to keep him from going completely off the rails."



7. Ann Romney cried when Obama won
When it was all over on Election Night, the GOP nominee called Obama to concede defeat. "Romney was stoic as he talked to the president," says CBS News' Crawford, "but his wife Ann cried." His running mate Paul Ryan "seemed genuinely shocked," while "Ryan's wife Janna also was shaken and cried softly."



8. Romney had purchased victory fireworks
"Things didn't go as planned for Mitt Romney on Election Day in more ways than one," says Glen Johnson at The Boston Globe. "The Republican was prepared to celebrate his election as the 45th president with an eight-minute fireworks display within view of his party at the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center." The Romney campaign reportedly paid $25,000 for fireworks that "had a patriotic theme, heavy on red, white, and blue colors."
 
Seeking answers to why their presidential candidate lost the election, the first round of consensus on the right has focused on the Republican need to recalibrate its message to connect with the nation's shifting voting demographics—or, at the very least, acknowledge that the country is changing.
The search for answers about What Went Wrong began almost immediately on election night, a signal that some had already been mulling the possibility of a loss for some time.
"Two obvious lessons so far: It's a different country demographically. And mediocre candidates lose elections," Tucker Carlson, a Fox News contributor and editor in chief of the Daily Caller, posted on Twitter on Tuesday night. He went on to write an essay with Daily Caller publisher Neil Patel, a former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, about the Republicans' failed attempt to take back the White House.
"The country is changing too fast," Carlson and Patel wrote in their election postmortem. "Most people have the sense that America is different demographically from what it was 20 years ago. But unless they've been reading the latest census data, they have no real idea. The changes are that profound. They're also permanent and likely to accelerate. In order to remain competitive outside Utah, the GOP will have to win new voters, and soon."
According to early data from Election Day, a whopping 75 percent of Latino voters voted for President Barack Obama, an increase from 2008, when the group chose Obama over Sen. John McCain 67 to 31 percent. Obama was also successful among Asian-American voters, who supported the president over Mitt Romney 73 to 26 percent. As expected, Obama won more than 90 percent of the black vote.
"Romney made a conscious decision to blow off Hispanic voters," wrote Red State editor Erick Erickson. "Yes conservatives, we must account for this. The Romney campaign to the Hispanic community was atrocious and, frankly, the fastest growing demographic in America isn't going to vote for a party that sounds like that party hates brown people. That does not mean the GOP must offer up amnesty. It does mean that a group that is a natural fit for the GOP on social issues, must in someway be made to feel comfortable with the GOP."
Long before Tuesday's election, there was a realization among Republicans that the coalitions the party had built and benefited from in years past would no longer be strong enough to win national elections.
"We're nonstarters with these groups. That's what's wrong. It's an unsustainable coalition," former Virginia Republican Rep. Tom Davis told reporters during a breakfast meeting in September. "We've got to be an open, welcoming party and recognize that we're going to have to broaden our coalition to start winning elections. We are a regional party now.
"If you can't win in these circumstances, what do you do when things are good?" Davis added.
The lack of outreach to minority voters stretched back into the primaries. While Republicans, for instance, campaigned for primary votes in Michigan, a state with the highest concentration of Muslim and Arab Americans, Ron Paul was the only candidate to reach out to those communities. The rest, including Romney, declined to put forth much of an effort. The Republican debates, in which Romney sought to outflank his opponents by tilting to their right on immigration, also may have hurt the Republican candidate among Latinos, who remembered the positions he took only a few months earlier.
Romney himself seemed to realize that Republicans faced a challenge of an expanding Democratic electorate, but he did not seem eager to make efforts to reach it. His secretly recorded comments at an off-the -record fundraiser last spring, in which he told a group of donors that it would be impossible for him to convince "47 percent" of the country to vote for him, were indicative of this fear, which was spreading through the Republican Party.
"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what," Romney told donors at the time, although the recording of his comments were not made public until Mother Jones magazine unearthed them in September. "All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it."
Others on the right blamed the loss on Romney's lack of conservative credentials. Despite referring to himself during the primaries as "severely conservative," Romney was, after all, a former governor of a liberal blue state with a moderate record. Republicans aligned with the tea party, many of whom held their noses to support Romney over Obama, lashed out at the party for choosing a candidate they never fully supported in the first place.
"What we got was a weak, moderate candidate, handpicked by the Beltway elites and country club establishment wing of the Republican Party," said Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin at a postelection press conference in Washington.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who warned Republicans about supporting what he called a "Massachusetts moderate" during his primary campaign against Romney, called on Republicans to be more inclusive in their voter outreach methods.
"The question is do they want to, in a disciplined way, create a schedule and a program and include people who are not traditionally Republican?" Gingrich said during a Wednesday interview on CNN's "Starting Point With Soledad O'Brien." "The difference between outreach and inclusion, is outreach is when five white guys have a meeting and call you," he continued. "Inclusion is when you're in the meeting."
 
Samahani, inawezekana jibu langu likawa la kukurupuka kwa vile sikusome posts zote zilizonitangulia.

Sababu kubwa ya Romney kushindwa uchaguzi siyo demographics kama wengi wanavyodhani; tatizo kubwa kwa Romney ni policies za Republicans. Kuna minorities wengi waliompigia kura Obama siyo kwa sababu ya race yake, umri wake au kupenda policies za Democrats bali ni kwa sababu ya kuogopa policies za Republicans.

Hata kama unachukia ukomunist, dunia ya leo hii ni ndogo sana kiasi kuwa umimi katika taifa siyo kitu cha kujivunia tena, ingawa umimi ulikuwa mzuri zamani. Taifa moja leo hii ni kama familia moja miaka mingi ya zamani. Sasa unapojenga policy za kutokumthamni mtu aisiyekuwa na uwezo katika taifa lako ni kama kuwa unakuwa unabagua sehemu ya familia yako, jambo ambalo litaendelea kuwasumbua sana republicans.

47% na I don't care about the poor comments za Romney ilikuwa ni reflection ya policies za Rebulicans ambazo ndizo zilizompa ushindi Obama.
 
Hata Democrats waliposhindwa chaguzi mbili mfululizo kuna watu walidhani kuwa labda huo ndiyo mwisho wao. GOP wana nafasi kubwa sana ya kushinda uraisi 2016

Uchumi si lazima uwe mbaya. Mwaka 2000 uchumi haukuwa mbaya lakini W akambwaga Bw.Gore. Fatigue ya one party baada ya miaka 8 huchangia watu kutaka kubadili chama.

....Shifting a goal post!.....Romnesiasis!!
 
Naona hii ndio imekuwa 'fashion' kwa sasa, yaani kuna 'fashion' ya kuchagua viongozi 'fake'.

Angalia hapa :-
  • Uingereza walimchagua David Cameron (jamaa ndio kinara wa sera za ushoga)
  • Ufaransa walimchagua Holande (anaunga mkono ushoga)
  • Marekani wamemchagua Obama (anaunga mkono ushoga ) !!!

Kaazi kweli-kweli !!!!!

wafanye nini na hata baadhi ya makanisa yanaunga mkono hiyo shughuli na wanao wafuasi wengi huko ulaya na marekani??
 
Naona hii ndio imekuwa 'fashion' kwa sasa, yaani kuna 'fashion' ya kuchagua viongozi 'fake'.

Angalia hapa :-
  • Uingereza walimchagua David Cameron (jamaa ndio kinara wa sera za ushoga)
  • Ufaransa walimchagua Holande (anaunga mkono ushoga)
  • Marekani wamemchagua Obama (anaunga mkono ushoga ) !!!

Kaazi kweli-kweli !!!!!

Angalia fact zako kwanza kabla ya kuweka hapa, Uk ipo kwenye serikali ya coalition ... ... unlike the other .. ... ...


OOOps pole sana Nyani Ngabu naona Romnesia itakwisha tu khe khe khe khe khe khe kheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
 
Zakumi
Daah hii kali yaani humuamini mwanakijiji kiasi hiki? Kampeni zilikuwa kali sana Romney alikuwa anatumia media; Obama alikuwa boots palikuwa patamu sana.

Chama
Gongo la mboto DSM


Namchomekea tu. Tukirudi kwenye mada, inaonyesha kwa jinsi demograph ya Tanzania ilivyobadilika, chama chochote kile kinaweza kushinda kwa kutumia tactics za Obama.
 
Angalia fact zako kwanza kabla ya kuweka hapa, Uk ipo kwenye serikali ya coalition ... ... unlike the other .. ... ...


[h=1]David Cameron Says Gay Marriage Will Be Legal In Britain By 2015[/h]
On the eve of Mitt Romney's visit to London, UK Prime Minister David Cameron chose to reaffirm his support of gay marriage, and said he believed it would be legal within three years. Addressing a group of LGBT community members in a reception, Cameron vowed that he hoped to follow in Scotland's footsteps, which recently declared it would attempt to legalize gay marriage by 2015, reports CNN.

"I just want to say I am absolutely determined that this Coalition government will follow in that tradition by legislating for gay marriage in this Parliament," he told the crowd

Read more: British PM Cameron: Gay Marriage Legal By 2015 - Business Insider
 
wafanye nini na hata baadhi ya makanisa yanaunga mkono hiyo shughuli na wanao wafuasi wengi huko ulaya na marekani??

Hapo inabidi 'kukomaa' tu na kuwa na msimamo wa kupinga ushoga.
Kiongozi akiyombishwa na maoni ya watu, itafika mahali kila kitu kitakuwa halali.
Yaani maovu mengi yatahalalishwa kama inavyotokea Marekani sasa hivi.
Angalia:-
1. Marekani imehalalisha ushoga
2. Baadhai ya majimbo ya marekani yamehalalisha matumizi ya bangi
3. Baadhai ya majimbo Marekani yamehalalisha utoaji mimba
4.
5.
Nini kitafuata baadaye ????
  • Kuhalalisha wizi,
  • kuhalalisha uzinzi,
  • kuhalalisha ubakaji,
  • kuhalalisha uuaji (hivi utoaji mimba ni uuaji ??)....
 
Back
Top Bottom