Ikitotanzila
JF-Expert Member
- Sep 22, 2020
- 1,409
- 2,263
Mh!Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.
Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".
If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.
The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.
But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose a
Now what is the use of his nuclear bomb? Did he manufacture it for funny or rather showoff ?It's not the issue of daring!! It's the issue of moral values! It's only the immoral USA which can dare to drop a nuke bomb to another country! USA remains to be the only country in history which has managed to be immoral enough to resort to the nuclear bomb! I don't think Putin can do so!!
Not all 'nukes' are created the same.Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.
Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".
If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.
The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.
But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose as well.
Instead of concentrating to the ongoing Conflict between Russia and Ukraine you better use your energy to advice your President on how He / She can tackle the 'Four Historical Problems' of Ignorance, Poverty, Diseases and Corruption.Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.
Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".
If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.
The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.
But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose as well.
This needs some explaining. What happened? Were they forced by a treaty to give up their nukes?..Ukrainians have to blame themselves for giving up their nuclear arsenal and handing it over Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed.
This needs some explaining. What happened? Were they forced by a treaty to give up their nukes?
Na yeye ndio utakuwa mwisho wake, na inawezekana ndio ikawa mwanzo wa vita kuu ya dunia ambayo itamaliza kabisa na kuifanya hii dunia isikalike tena kwa mwanadamuMwanzo nilikuwa nikiamini mtu akijenga hoja kwa lugha ya kiingereza hiyo hoja inakuwa na mantiki na nondo za hatari.
Kwanza jiulize. Russia walitengeneza silaha za nyuklia kwa ajili ya kufanyia nini. Bila shaka ni kujilinda, si ndio? So, ikitokea ulazima wa kuitumia, itatumika tu. Sio kwa hao ndugu zake tu, hata kwa hao Nato na US ikibidi. Yale sio mapambo.
Deterrent weaponNow what is the use of his nuclear bomb? Did he manufacture it for funny or rather showoff ?
How come then one of the guarantors is reneging on his/her responsibility? I've in mind the later...Ukraine was persuaded to denuclearize in exchange for security guantee by the Russians and US.
Wanadamu wataendelea kuwepo bro. Kama wamechoka kiluishi wauane wao kwa waoNa yeye ndio utakuwa mwisho wake, na inawezekana ndio ikawa mwanzo wa vita kuu ya dunia ambayo itamaliza kabisa na kuifanya hii dunia isikalike tena kwa mwanadamu
How come then one of the guarantors is reneging on his/her responsibility? I've in mind the later.
Inawezekana tukaendelea kuwepo lakini kumbuka kuna viumbe vilikuwepo kabla yetu na vikawa wiped na natural disaster na havipo tena mfano dinosaurs, binadamu we are not special ni viumbe tuu kama viumbe wengine kwa hiyo nuclear inaweza ikasafisha human race without a traceWanadamu wataendelea kuwepo bro. Kama wamechoka kiluishi wauane wao kwa wao
Oh, could it be that the $41 Billion is part of the obligation tied to the guarantee?..that is a tough question to answer.
Don't hit around the bush, be direct to whom you refer. For sure you are talking of Her Excellency.Instead of concentrating to the ongoing Conflict between Russia and Ukraine you better use your energy to advice your President on how He / She can tackle the 'Four Historical Problems' of Ignorance, Poverty, Diseases and Corruption.