Sijakurupuka. Wewe ndio usiyetambua ukweli. Vatican ni state.
Jasusi
Niko makini ndugu yangu sikurupuki kama wengine nakuambia na narudia tena kwa msisitizo Vatican ni taasisi na sio nchi kama mnavyotaka kutuaminisha. Nakushauri usome vitabu ujiridhishe kabla kuja kubishana na mie. Nitakupa reference wapi mie nilisoma ukasome na wewe.
Professor Anthony Aust aliandika kitabu kinaitwa Handbook of International Law 2005, 2006,2009, 2010 editions namnukuu alisema hivi:-
"Is the Vatican a State?
Sir,
It is wrong for the United Kingdom to continue to recognise the Vatican as a state, have an ambassador to the Vatican, and accord the Pope a visit as a Head of State. This is irrespective of whether it is good or bad.
The Vatican is a tiny area (110 acres) with a resident population of some 800 whose main purpose is to support the Holy See. The Vatican is not a member of the United Nations. It may be seen best for what it really is: a small part of Italy devoted to proselytising Roman Catholicism, which is an important religion but no more than that."
So bwana Jasusi tukisoma between the lines kwanza tunaona kuwa the legitimacy of vatican to be a state is wrong
and not only wrong it is also unfair as Vatican city state is country depending on the other country which is Italy. Na jamaa akapigia msumari zaidi kusema kuwa watu wake 800 wanafanya kazi ya kiroho sasa sijui vp tuiite Vatican City as a state.
Pia bwana Jasusi Judge Geofrey Robertson alipiga msumari mwengine katika kitabu chake hichi kakisome The Case of the Pope – Vatican Accountability for Human Rights Abuse. Alisema hivi na akitoa reference from different academics kuwa:-
"The starting point – The Creation of States in International Law – began in 1976 as a doctoral thesis by James Crawford: his second edition remarks (understatedly) that
"the legal status of the Vatican City has been the subject of much study and some controversy". He still inclines to his earlier view that the Vatican City is a state but admits that some experts have denied this and that "the position of the Vatican City is peculiar and the criterion for statehood in its case only marginally (if at all) complied with".(16) Professor Gillian Triggs, correctly in my view, concludes
"The Vatican City does not meet the criteria for statehood" (17) – it has no accredited diplomats, for a start, and serves as a territorial prop for the Holy See which ratifies most of its treaties. Crawford considers that the relationship between the City and the See is "a matter for some perplexity" and cites "the best modern study" of the issue which concludes (correctly in my view) that
"the Holy See is not a state in international law, but has an international legal personality of its own which permits it to take international actions such as the conclusion of treaties and the maintenance of diplomatic relations".(18) Another leading textbook, International Law, sets out reasons to question "the reality of Vatican statehood",(19) whilst the late Professor Ian Brownlie's standard student textbook o
pines that the Vatican City claim is doubtful and the personality of the Holy See, as a politico-religious hybrid, is "even more difficult to solve" and can only be characterised by the way in which individual states relate to it. (20)"
Sasa Jasusi kabishane na hawa maprofessa wa international law maana nikiendelea kuwafahamisha hamuelewi mwisho siku nimeamua nawapa misumari tu muimeze hata kama ni michungu ndio elimu hiyo. In summary Vatican City ni taasisi na sio state.
Sikukuu njema wakuu.