Cord wait for 2018 election
Kenyatta said that IEBC was not constitutionally bound to use the Biometric Voter Identification (BVI) or an electronic system of transmitting election results.
"It is a fundamental misconception of the law for the petitioner (Odinga) to contend that either registration of voters, identification of voters or transmission of the votes cast was required by law to be done via an electronic system," Kenyatta's reply reads in part.
He adds that Odinga's claims about the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) are hypocritical as he had last year called for a return to the manual system and declared that ‘Kenyans did not want the BVR system.'
"Following consultations between the president, the petitioner and the 1st respondent (IEBC), a decision was made to procure the BVR Kits from the Government of Canada in a government-government deal. The Cabinet meeting at which the decision was made was chaired by the president and the petitioner," he says.
"It therefore follows that the petitioner had a critical role in the identification and eventual purchase of the BVR kits. The petitioner cannot therefore either find a cause of action arising from his participation in the purchase of the BVR kits and/or benefit from the ultimate partial failure of the electronic systems," he contends.
Uhuru: Raila case ‘expression of bitterness after loss' | Capital News
Hii ndio habari bana. Kumbe alihusika kununua hizo mashine, !!!!!!
hizi sababu za uhuru ni dhaifu sana against za cord. They better come with facts. Siyo kwa sababu electronic system ilishafeli marekani au ghana nako iwe guarantee zitafeli hapa.
Hapa hamna kitu, kama response yenyewe ndio hii sioni uhuru atachomokaje hapa
Waziri mkuu ndo mtendaji mkuu wa serikali, hii kesi ni ngumu sana kwake. Inatakiwa Raila aonyeshe kufeli kwa machine kulim-feva Uhuru na hakukum-feva Raila, hapo ndo kasheshe linaanza. Ama njama za kufeli machine hazikufanywa na waziri mkuu dhidi ya Uhuru, bali Uhuru dhidi ya waziri mkuu.
By Black Uhuru
Kenyatta said that IEBC was not constitutionally bound to use the Biometric Voter Identification (BVI) or an electronic system of transmitting election results.
"It is a fundamental misconception of the law for the petitioner (Odinga) to contend that either registration of voters, identification of voters or transmission of the votes cast was required by law to be done via an electronic system," Kenyatta's reply reads in part.
He adds that Odinga's claims about the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) are hypocritical as he had last year called for a return to the manual system and declared that ‘Kenyans did not want the BVR system.'
"Following consultations between the president, the petitioner and the 1st respondent (IEBC), a decision was made to procure the BVR Kits from the Government of Canada in a government-government deal. The Cabinet meeting at which the decision was made was chaired by the president and the petitioner," he says.
"It therefore follows that the petitioner had a critical role in the identification and eventual purchase of the BVR kits. The petitioner cannot therefore either find a cause of action arising from his participation in the purchase of the BVR kits and/or benefit from the ultimate partial failure of the electronic systems," he contends.
Uhuru: Raila case ‘expression of bitterness after loss' | Capital News