Silaha za NATO ni bure tu kwa Urusi

Mkuu wa majeshi wa zamani wa Ukraine ambae Sasa ni Balozi wa Ukraine nchini Uingereza amesema NATO wameshatumia silaha zao zote kwa Urusi,lakini Urusi imekua ikizitafutia suluhisho haraka sana.

Amesema NATO wameshatumia silaha zote kasoro Nyukilia,F35 na Hata Aircraft carrier za Marekani hazitumiaka katika vita vya Ukraine.

Lakini silaha nyingine zote zimeshatimika na hazija letata mafanikio yoyote dhidi ya Urusi.

Pia amesema mbinu za vita za NATO ni za kizamani sana na zimeshindwa kufua dafu kwa urusi.
CDF huyo wa zamani wa Ukraine amesema Ukraine haitaweza kujiunga na NATO.

Sio maneno yangu,soma hapo chini.

Former Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi stated that NATO's current combat strategies and weaponry doctrines are outdated and exhausted against modern threats, warning that Russia has successfully developed countermeasures to nearly every Western weapon deployed on the battlefield. [1, 2]
Zaluzhnyi, who currently serves as Ukraine's Ambassador to the United Kingdom, made these remarks during a meeting of Ukrainian ambassadors in August 2026. He emphasized that while he personally supports the Alliance, its current operational framework requires a massive technological and strategic overhaul. [1]

Core Criticisms of NATO Weapons and Doctrines

• • Countered by Russia: Ukraine has deployed almost every weapon type in NATO’s standard toolkit, but Russia has quickly adapted, studied Western systems, and built effective battlefield countermeasures. [1, 2]
  • Outdated Framework: The alliance remains conceptually restricted by "World War II-era doctrines" that fail to account for the speed and ubiquity of drone warfare, modern precision munitions, and electronic warfare. [1, 2, 3]
  • Lagging Capabilities: Zaluzhnyi warned in outlets like The Times that NATO could need more than a decade to close the tactical gap and match the current operational evolution displayed by Russia. [1]
  • Exhausted Potential: The conventional strategic military aid provided by the West has met its limits, leaving Ukraine technologically ahead in frontline experience compared to the alliance itself. [1, 2]

Clarification on NATO Membership
Zaluzhnyi initially sparked controversy by stating that Ukraine would "never join" NATO because its military advancement has outpaced the alliance's outdated framework. Following a statement by Ukraine's Foreign Ministry noting his words were taken out of context, Zaluzhnyi clarified that he fully backs NATO but believes the bloc cannot realistically integrate Ukraine until the alliance completely reinvents its standards. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Proposed Alternatives
Despite criticizing their baseline doctrines, Zaluzhnyi acknowledged that Ukraine is still heavily reliant on specialized, high-tier NATO technologies. He highlighted that the country urgently requires: [1]

• • Advanced anti-ballistic missile defense to counter ongoing Russian strikes.
  • Space-based military capabilities and intelligence networks. [1, 2, 3, 4]

As a parallel solution to formal NATO integration, Zaluzhnyi proposed that Ukraine focus heavily on flexible, localized defense coalitions, specifically citing the U.K.-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) as a modern model for European security blocs. [1, 2]

After criticism, former Ukrainian army chief says he remains pro-NATO​

Wed, August 05, 2026 - 23:20
2 min

Former commander-in-chief explains how he introduced NATO standards in Ukraine
Kateryna Shkarlat
Photo: Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's ambassador to the UK (Getty Images)
Ukraine's ambassador to the UK, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, has explained his controversial remarks about NATO, according to Interfax-Ukraine.



Zaluzhnyi said that in 2019 he was one of the strongest advocates of transitioning Ukraine's Armed Forces to NATO standards, a position that drew significant criticism.

"I made so many enemies because of it that you can't even imagine. I am pro-NATO," he said.

At the same time, the former commander-in-chief believes there are many questions surrounding NATO when viewed "from a political perspective." He noted that since the start of the war, Ukraine has used nearly every type of weapon available, while Russia "has found a countermeasure to everything."

"NATO remains rooted in the doctrine of the end of World War II, while we are technologically ahead. Scientific and technological progress, combined with the ongoing war, has brought Ukraine's Armed Forces to an entirely different level," the ambassador said.

Kama kasema huyu,Mimi ni nani nibishe kua NATO ni Kwa ajili ya vita ndogondogo TU?​

Urusi ni level nyingine kabisa kivita.

​

Ex-top general Zaluzhnyi explains his “Ukraine will never join NATO” remark: I back the Alliance, but it must transform first.​

Former commander-in-chief Zaluzhnyi says he supports NATO but believes Alliance must transform​

Ivanna Kostina, Tetyana Oliynyk
5 August, 23:05


Valerii Zaluzhnyi. Photo: Zaluzhnyi on social media
Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's Ambassador to the United Kingdom and former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, has clarified his recent remarks about Ukraine's prospects for joining NATO.

Source: European Pravda, citing Interfax-Ukraine

Details: Zaluzhnyi was asked to explain his comments about NATO made during a meeting of Ukrainian ambassadors. He stressed that he is a supporter of the Alliance but believes it must undergo significant transformation.


The general also noted that in 2019 he was one of the leading advocates and architects of reforming the Armed Forces of Ukraine to meet NATO standards, a role that attracted considerable criticism.

Quote: "You are looking at the person who, in 2019, personally designed the entire reform and drafted amendments to nearly 37 legislative acts to transition Ukraine's strategic-level command system to NATO principles and standards. I made so many enemies that you cannot imagine. I support NATO."

Details: However, Zaluzhnyi argued that "from a political perspective, there are many questions about NATO as an alliance that was built to protect the old world."

"Scientific and technological progress has changed everything. By 2026, Ukraine has used virtually every type of weapon, except perhaps Tomahawk missiles, nuclear weapons, aircraft carriers and F-35 fighter jets that are in NATO's arsenal, and has applied the doctrines for their use. That resource has been exhausted. Russia has found ways to counter all of it," he explained.

Expanding on his point, he said that "NATO still operates according to a doctrine shaped at the end of the Second World War, while technologically we are already ahead."

"Scientific and technological progress, together with the ongoing war, has brought the Armed Forces of Ukraine to a completely different level. NATO now has no choice but to adopt entirely new standards and develop a fundamentally new doctrine. Only then will NATO be ready for Ukraine's membership. I have said that we need an entirely new security bloc, most likely one centred in Europe. A completely new one," the general said

Former commander-in-chief Zaluzhnyi says he supports NATO but believes Alliance must transform​

Ivanna Kostina, Tetyana Oliynyk
5 August, 23:05

Valerii Zaluzhnyi. Photo: Zaluzhnyi on social media
Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's Ambassador to the United Kingdom and former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, has clarified his recent remarks about Ukraine's prospects for joining NATO.
Source: European Pravda, citing Interfax-Ukraine
Details: Zaluzhnyi was asked to explain his comments about NATO made during a meeting of Ukrainian ambassadors. He stressed that he is a supporter of the Alliance but believes it must undergo significant transformation.
The general also noted that in 2019 he was one of the leading advocates and architects of reforming the Armed Forces of Ukraine to meet NATO standards, a role that attracted considerable criticism.
Quote: "You are looking at the person who, in 2019, personally designed the entire reform and drafted amendments to nearly 37 legislative acts to transition Ukraine's strategic-level command system to NATO principles and standards. I made so many enemies that you cannot imagine. I support NATO."
Details: However, Zaluzhnyi argued that "from a political perspective, there are many questions about NATO as an alliance that was built to protect the old world."
"Scientific and technological progress has changed everything. By 2026, Ukraine has used virtually every type of weapon, except perhaps Tomahawk missiles, nuclear weapons, aircraft carriers and F-35 fighter jets that are in NATO's arsenal, and has applied the doctrines for their use. That resource has been exhausted. Russia has found ways to counter all of it," he explained.
Expanding on his point, he said that "NATO still operates according to a doctrine shaped at the end of the Second World War, while technologically we are already ahead."
"Scientific and technological progress, together with the ongoing war, has brought the Armed Forces of Ukraine to a completely different level. NATO now has no choice but to adopt entirely new standards and develop a fundamentally new doctrine. Only then will NATO be ready for Ukraine's membership. I have said that we need an entirely new security bloc, most likely one centred in Europe. A completely new one," the general said

Lengo kuu la Urusi kuivamia Ukraine lilikua ni hilo.​

Reuters

UNCAPTIONED: Former Ukraine Army Chief Zaluzhnyi Says Ukraine Will "Never Join" NATO​

Nchi zinazoisaidia Ukraine katika vita yake dhidi ya Urusi

Countries helping Ukraine in war against Russia

The international coalition supporting Ukraine includes over 50 nations, coordinated primarily through the Ukraine Defense Contact Group. The European Union and the United States lead in providing hundreds of billions of dollars in combined military, financial, and humanitarian aid. [1, 2, 3]

Major Financial and Military Donors

• • United States: Largest single bilateral donor, providing advanced air defenses, tanks, and artillery.
  • European Union Institutions & Member States: Collective financial, humanitarian, and military packages totaling over €210 billion.
  • Germany: Major European contributor of heavy weaponry, anti-aircraft systems, and financial aid.
  • United Kingdom: Early and consistent supplier of long-range missiles, tanks, and training. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Regional and Partner Support

• • Poland & Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania): Staunch advocates providing substantial military stocks and regional security coordination. [1]
  • Nordic Countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland): Active contributors of joint funding frameworks, fighter jet training, and advanced munitions. [1, 2]
  • Other Global Allies: Nations like Canada, Japan, and Australia have provided significant non-lethal equipment, financial assistance, and sanction enforcement against Russia. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Mungu ibariki urusi,yaani mi mayahudi na usa yakiteseka nafurahika sana
Hawa waonezi sana

Lee Van free said:

Mkuu wa majeshi wa zamani wa Ukraine ambae Sasa ni Balozi wa Ukraine nchini Uingereza amesema NATO wameshatumia silaha zao zote kwa Urusi,lakini Urusi imekua ikizitafutia suluhisho haraka sana.

Amesema NATO wameshatumia silaha zote kasoro Nyukilia,F35 na Hata Aircraft carrier za Marekani hazitumiaka katika vita vya Ukraine.

Lakini silaha nyingine zote zimeshatimika na hazija letata mafanikio yoyote dhidi ya Urusi.

Pia amesema mbinu za vita za NATO ni za kizamani sana na zimeshindwa kufua dafu kwa urusi.
CDF huyo wa zamani wa Ukraine amesema Ukraine haitaweza kujiunga na NATO.

Sio maneno yangu,soma hapo chini.

Former Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi stated that NATO's current combat strategies and weaponry doctrines are outdated and exhausted against modern threats, warning that Russia has successfully developed countermeasures to nearly every Western weapon deployed on the battlefield. [1, 2]
Zaluzhnyi, who currently serves as Ukraine's Ambassador to the United Kingdom, made these remarks during a meeting of Ukrainian ambassadors in August 2026. He emphasized that while he personally supports the Alliance, its current operational framework requires a massive technological and strategic overhaul. [1]

Core Criticisms of NATO Weapons and Doctrines

• • Countered by Russia: Ukraine has deployed almost every weapon type in NATO’s standard toolkit, but Russia has quickly adapted, studied Western systems, and built effective battlefield countermeasures. [1, 2]
  • Outdated Framework: The alliance remains conceptually restricted by "World War II-era doctrines" that fail to account for the speed and ubiquity of drone warfare, modern precision munitions, and electronic warfare. [1, 2, 3]
  • Lagging Capabilities: Zaluzhnyi warned in outlets like The Times that NATO could need more than a decade to close the tactical gap and match the current operational evolution displayed by Russia. [1]
  • Exhausted Potential: The conventional strategic military aid provided by the West has met its limits, leaving Ukraine technologically ahead in frontline experience compared to the alliance itself. [1, 2]

Clarification on NATO Membership
Zaluzhnyi initially sparked controversy by stating that Ukraine would "never join" NATO because its military advancement has outpaced the alliance's outdated framework. Following a statement by Ukraine's Foreign Ministry noting his words were taken out of context, Zaluzhnyi clarified that he fully backs NATO but believes the bloc cannot realistically integrate Ukraine until the alliance completely reinvents its standards. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Proposed Alternatives
Despite criticizing their baseline doctrines, Zaluzhnyi acknowledged that Ukraine is still heavily reliant on specialized, high-tier NATO technologies. He highlighted that the country urgently requires: [1]

• • Advanced anti-ballistic missile defense to counter ongoing Russian strikes.
  • Space-based military capabilities and intelligence networks. [1, 2, 3, 4]

As a parallel solution to formal NATO integration, Zaluzhnyi proposed that Ukraine focus heavily on flexible, localized defense coalitions, specifically citing the U.K.-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) as a modern model for European security blocs. [1, 2]

Click to expand...

Despite all remarks, time will tell the truth.

Walokole hawajauona huu uzi bado

Ngoja wachafuzi uchwara wa jf waje hapa uone
Nawakumbusha tu wachafuzi uchwara marekani ana miezi sita sasa sio kuiangusha sirikali ya iran hapana hata kuifungua tu kigamboni ya iran kachemka
Ila super glue 😁

Lee Van free said:

After criticism, former Ukrainian army chief says he remains pro-NATO​

Wed, August 05, 2026 - 23:20
2 min

Former commander-in-chief explains how he introduced NATO standards in Ukraine
Kateryna Shkarlat
Photo: Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's ambassador to the UK (Getty Images)
Ukraine's ambassador to the UK, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, has explained his controversial remarks about NATO, according to Interfax-Ukraine.



Zaluzhnyi said that in 2019 he was one of the strongest advocates of transitioning Ukraine's Armed Forces to NATO standards, a position that drew significant criticism.

"I made so many enemies because of it that you can't even imagine. I am pro-NATO," he said.

At the same time, the former commander-in-chief believes there are many questions surrounding NATO when viewed "from a political perspective." He noted that since the start of the war, Ukraine has used nearly every type of weapon available, while Russia "has found a countermeasure to everything."

"NATO remains rooted in the doctrine of the end of World War II, while we are technologically ahead. Scientific and technological progress, combined with the ongoing war, has brought Ukraine's Armed Forces to an entirely different level," the ambassador said.

Click to expand...

Ukisoma hii para ya mwisho inathibitisha kwamba hizo silaha za Nato pamoja na teknolojia yao ya hali ya juu imeifanya Ukraine kuwa kwenye kiwango tofauti kabisa.

Hivyo nafikiri ni lugha ndio inawapa changamoto hapa islamist jihadists wanaoifagilia Russia kwa sababu za kidini zaidi kuliko uhalisia wa mambo.

Mpaka sasa vita vya Russia na Ukraine viko kwenye mwaka wa tano na bado havina kabisa dalili za kumalizika na hiyo imewezekana kwa hisani ya Nato.

Imeloa said:

Ukisoma hii para ya mwisho inathibitisha kwamba hizo silaha za Nato pamoja na teknolojia yao ya hali ya juu imeifanya Ukraine kuwa kwenye kiwango tofauti kabisa.

Hivyo nafikiri ni lugha ndio inawapa changamoto hapa islamist jihadists wanaoifagilia Russia kwa sababu za kidini zaidi kuliko uhalisia wa mambo.

Mpaka sasa vita vya Russia na Ukraine viko kwenye mwaka wa tano na bado havina kabisa dalili za kumalizika na hiyo imewezekana kwa hisani ya Nato.

Click to expand...

Naona magaidi wa kizayuni kutoka jf munateseka kweli na ukweli
Safari hii mutajamba sanaaaaaaa

Bwana Utam said:

Naona magaidi wa kizayuni kutoka jf munateseka kweli na ukweli
Safari hii mutajamba sanaaaaaaa

Click to expand...

Uelewa wako ni mdogo sana hivyo tafuta mkalimani kama huelewi maudhui ya hiyo para.

Halafu jaribu kuacha utoto kwani una utoto utoto mwingi sana na uhuni wa kijinga.

Kubwa la Maadui said:

Walokole hawajauona huu uzi bado

Click to expand...

Hapa itakua Walokole vs WaOthodox

Imeloa said:

Ukisoma hii para ya mwisho inathibitisha kwamba hizo silaha za Nato pamoja na teknolojia yao ya hali ya juu imeifanya Ukraine kuwa kwenye kiwango tofauti kabisa.

Hivyo nafikiri ni lugha ndio inawapa changamoto hapa islamist jihadists wanaoifagilia Russia kwa sababu za kidini zaidi kuliko uhalisia wa mambo.

Mpaka sasa vita vya Russia na Ukraine viko kwenye mwaka wa tano na bado havina kabisa dalili za kumalizika na hiyo imewezekana kwa hisani ya Nato.

Click to expand...

Ni kweli miaka mitano ,
-Urusi vs Ukraine+All collective west.

Lakini sio ajabu kwa muda huo,

iliwahi kutokea,
Miaka 20
-Watalaban vs USA +NATO+All collective west

(Nasisistiza Tena Watalaban)

Imeloa said:

Ukisoma hii para ya mwisho inathibitisha kwamba hizo silaha za Nato pamoja na teknolojia yao ya hali ya juu imeifanya Ukraine kuwa kwenye kiwango tofauti kabisa.

Hivyo nafikiri ni lugha ndio inawapa changamoto hapa islamist jihadists wanaoifagilia Russia kwa sababu za kidini zaidi kuliko uhalisia wa mambo.

Mpaka sasa vita vya Russia na Ukraine viko kwenye mwaka wa tano na bado havina kabisa dalili za kumalizika na hiyo imewezekana kwa hisani ya Nato.

Click to expand...

Nakukumbusha TU kua hayo sio maneno yangu,ni maneno ya CDF wa zamani wa Ukraine.
Inawezekana sijui lugha ya kiingereza vizuri,kitu ambacho sio dhambi.
Lkn kasema NATO inahitaji kufanyiwa Marekebisho au maboresho,nadhani ameona ni dhaifu tu kwa Urusi.
"Kumbuka huyo alikua ni CDF wa Ukraine".

Lee Van free said:

Ni kweli miaka mitano ,
-Urusi vs Ukraine+All collective west.

Lakini sio ajabu kwa muda huo,

iliwahi kutokea,
Miaka 20
-Watalaban vs USA +NATO+All collective west

(Nasisistiza Tena Watalaban)

Click to expand...

Subject here is Russia vs Ukraine as opposed to the US vs Taliban.

Please be informed accordingly.

Lee Van free said:

Hapa itakua Walokole vs WaOthodox

Click to expand...

Umeshaingiza tayari hizi dini za kuletewa..!!!

Imeloa said:

Umeshaingiza tayari hizi dini za kuletewa..!!!

Click to expand...

Nilikua namjibu "Kubwa la Maadui" wewe acha kupotosha.

Imeloa said:

Subject here is Russia vs Ukraine as opposed to the US vs Taliban.

Please be informed accordingly.

Click to expand...

Nimekupa mfano wa Talaban kujibu hoja Yako kua Urusi imepigana na Ukraine miaka mitano.
Hatukatazwi kurejea taarifa za nyuma kujenga hoja.

Hawa ni watu wasio na shukrani bila ya msaada wa NATO wasingeweza kuhimili vita na Russia. au yeye alijua vita ukipewa silaha tu ndio ushindi huyu alikuwaje kiongozi wa jeshi?