<p style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="font-family: &amp;amp">EXEMPTION CLAUSE</span></b></p> <ol class="decimal"><li><span style="font-family: &amp;amp">XXXX imported a cargo worthy USD 75,000. XXXX engaged YYYY to handle the cargo. The contract to that effect was concluded. The contract, however, contains an exemption clause which reads as follows:-</span> <span style="font-family: Symbol"><br /><br />
</span></li></ol><span style="font-family: Symbol"><br /><br />
</span><i><span style="font-family: &amp;amp">"YYYY at all time remains exempted from any liability relating to loss of the cargo, except when the loss is prompted by YYYY employee(s). And in the event any loss is suffered as a result of the negligence of YYYY' employee, the liability of YYYY shall not exceed USD 500."</span></i><br /><br />
<br /><br />
<ol class="decimal"><li>Now, the Cargo has got lost, and there is no evidence of negligence on the side of <i>YYYY</i> and or its employees. Will <i>YYYY</i> be held liable for the loss?</li></ol><span style="font-family: &amp;amp"> <br /><br />
Answer:<br /><br />
<br /><br />
</span><u><i>COOPER MOTORS CORPORATION (T) LTD v ARUSHA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTRE</i></u> [1991] TLR 165 (CA)<br /><br />
Court Court of......<br />
<br />
gud judgement,sensible one,a reasonable judge wudnt accept such a clause, only jus on its face(prima facie) t seems to be unfair,hw cn one escape liability of th property kept into/under his/her hands(custody) that much?once a thng(s) put to you, u've the duty to protect them n ts why u charge them.