Madabwada
JF-Expert Member
- May 8, 2009
- 541
- 314
Kwa kuanza lazima tudai reform ya United Nation, mfumo wa veto uondolewe, au kila ukanda wa dunia uwe na veto, lakini isiyoshikiliwa na nchi.
Lazima tuwe na jeshi la kulinda Uhuru wa Afrika.
Lazima tuwe na sarafu ya Afrika.
Tuwe na mfano wa IMF kwa Afrika.
Tuwe na Benki huru.
Tuzalishe Chakula kingi.
Tuache baadhi ya mikataba iliyolenga kuzitega nchi masikini kuwa dhaifu, kama vile kupiga vita mabomu ya ardhini!. kwa maana mabomu ya ardhini yatamzuia mvamizi kuvamia nchi yako, na ni kwa ajili ya stratergic defence, na wala siyo offensive weapon!
GLN, hiyo ni ngumu sana kuwa implemented taking into account marais wenyewe wa Africa wanaingia madarakani in the ways of Quattara, Kagame, Museveni, JK etc ... hivi unadani kwa akili yako US wakitaka jambo fulani liwe voted through AU as per their interest then wao watapinga?? Wakienda kinyume na wishes zao then ndo hapo kipondo kinavyogeuka kama tunavyojadili hii issue ya Cote' de Ivore!
Mababa wa mataifa yetu walishayaona hayo kabla, lakini kizazi hiki cha viongozi wa sasa wa Africa kwa kweli ni cancer isiyo na tiba:
In the days of the Cold War, the leading countries of the West created and supported a whole lot of corrupt dictators all over the Third World. The Marcoses, the Somozas, the Papa Docs, the Bokassas and the Mobutus of the Third World were all creatures and proteges of Western democracy. It is even said that when elections were proposed for South Vietnam the Americans opposed the idea. They feared that if the elections were free and fair the Communists would win them! The Cold War is now over; and refreshingly the same Western Countries have now become great champions of democracy and democratic elections everywhere
in the World. But now it has become their turn to preach a kind of "scientific" democracy. Democracy is being trotted out as if it is something that can be cloned like Dolly the sheep, and used anywhere and everywhere. We disagree and argue in vain that we must manage our own democratic development and change. For democracy to work properly, we argue, it must shape its mechanisms
to suit the culture, the conditions and current circumstances, and also the nature and purposes of a nation and its people. That is how democracy has developed in all the Western countries. American democracy, British democracy, Canadian democracy, Swiss democracy etc. are all democracies; but they are not clones of some original prototype ? they're different. Democracies in the countries of the
South should be allowed to develop their own institutions and characteristics. The people of Burundi, for instance, do not have to be apologetic about wanting to devise a democracy which suits Burundi. What is important is that it should be a democracy, but a democracy that is acceptable to the People of Burundi, and which serves their best interests.
But on top of dogmatic democracy we have now to contend with dogmatic capitalism also. Once again it is the turn of the capitalist world to insist on a kind of scientific capitalism which every country must follow. It is called: laissez-faire, free-market capitalism. Its preachers believe that it is both feasible and rational to ask Burkina Faso, and China, and India, and Russia, and Poland, and Brazil, and Tanzania, and Laos and Fiji to clone American capitalism. But once again this is absurd. Do we really have one capitalism in the capitalist world of to-day? Are German capitalism, French capitalism, Italian capitalism, Japanese capitalism, Korean capitalism all clones of American and British capitalism? Have they developed in the same way? The answer is clearly no. For once again in real life no country operates a pure laissez-faire capitalism. Why then, are capitalists of the South not being allowed to develop their own forms of capitalism? !