kshaka
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 3, 2011
- 366
- 118
Dhuks,
whichever way you slice it, this thing is not looking good for KE. Bantugbro has posted the following hypotheses,
1: Radars za Nanyuki AB zilikuwa hazifanyi kazi.
2: Waongozaji ndege wa Nanyuki AB hawaku-bother ku- assist their departing guests.
3: A serious party took place last night everyone was on hangover.
4: All of the above are true....
These are very valid questions that beg for answers, otherwise M7 will forever remain
suspicious and guarded. Somebody slept on the job on the Kenyan side and their is no
doubt about that. Its only fair that folks come out and say what happened on that fateful
day.
Ab-Titchaz.
Of course everything Kenya does is suspicious, it's not a surprise to see this theses forwarded on this website based on "facts" which exist only in Bantugbro's head.
Who told you that the choppers refuelled at LAB or that they took off from LAB towards the mountain (the Ugandans say different)?
Do you know the cause of the crash? AFAIK, no one does so why are you assuming that it's the route that they took that contributed mainly to the crash when the cause has not been determined yet?
Do you know the normal route the choppers travelling from LAB to Wajir take? Why are you assuming that the route they were given is not the normal one and was given to them for nefarious reasons (didn't one of the rescued Ugandans say they spotted a KAF Puma overfly them the morning after the crash on the same bearing they'd been on)?
The rescue chopper pilot said that he was given the coordinates of the ~ crash site by KAF, how do you think they knew the coordinates where the choppers disappeard if the radar at Nanyuki had not been monitoring the flight? What are you basing this assumption on?
Hasn't a joint commission of inquiry been set up with M7's brother the lead on the Ugandan side? Why are you assuming that Kenya also doesn't want answers?
Kenya's got over 60 combat gunships (around 20 of them being new) why would we feel threatened by Uganda's 8 vessels most of which were grounded until they were refurbished last year?
These are not valid questions because they are based on speculation and suppositions not supported by facts. We all know what motivates this kind of talk on this forum so let's stop pretending...What or where are the facts that this hypothesis is based on?
Last edited by a moderator: