Intelligence Justice
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 23, 2020
- 3,039
- 3,486
As the subject suggests, through the JF social media International platform, the government of 'South Africa', to debating the importance of replacing the current country's name to reflect the African indigenous community as it used to be known by the natives ( before colonialism) whereby there were several local chiefdoms such as KwaZulu, Bolobedu, Sekhukhune, Venda, Ndebele, Swatini and other small kingdoms.
There was a time when the citizens of South Africa wanted their country to be changed to represent the native geopolitical area as either 'Mzantsi' or 'Azania' the former meaning 'South' while the latter implying the Ocean coastline stretching from Lamu Kenya to South Africa attached with the black people. Other popular names preferred by the citizens to replace South Africa are Dzonga and Mh'alaganze.
To maintain the real taste of Af-rui-Ka (Alkebulan) and feel proud of being named after the land of origin it is vital for the name of South Africa as a country to be revoked.
The name of South Africa should be tailored to comprise the southern bloc countries only as it does for East Africa, West Africa, and North Africa.
There was a time when the citizens of South Africa wanted their country to be changed to represent the native geopolitical area as either 'Mzantsi' or 'Azania' the former meaning 'South' while the latter implying the Ocean coastline stretching from Lamu Kenya to South Africa attached with the black people. Other popular names preferred by the citizens to replace South Africa are Dzonga and Mh'alaganze.
To maintain the real taste of Af-rui-Ka (Alkebulan) and feel proud of being named after the land of origin it is vital for the name of South Africa as a country to be revoked.
The name of South Africa should be tailored to comprise the southern bloc countries only as it does for East Africa, West Africa, and North Africa.