Area 255 V/s 254, jinsi Mkenya huyu alivyotathimini

Utakuwa una lako jambo wewe Mkenya
 
You are completely misleading and trying to go out of point. This man categorically and knowingly chose four to five basic indicators and compared them between Kenya and Tanzania.

Those indicators which he chose, are the one which can be easily seen and are the basic important for well being of every human being, things like Hospitals, roads, electricity, water, housing and food.
 
He has been criticized as having visited only a small corridor of the country and making wide conclusions.

Therefore, even within those indicators, a clear and adequate sample space is crucial.

Else, one could be accused of cherry picking areas of interest.

This is where my point comes in. We must agree on definitions and metrics before delving into questions at any depth.

Because it is very easy to shroud any hastily arrived at conclusion under subjectivity.
 
This man had no intention of doing any research or any comparison, his intention was to visit his from in Dar, therefore his sampling method was very much random, there is no bias at all, good thing is that he used two different roads, Nairobi to Dar via Arusha and Moshi, and his way back used Dar, Tanga, Mombasa to Nairobi.

He covered at least 1500Km in Tanzania side alone, this distance is big enough to know conditions of Tanzanian roads. Also through this distance anybody can understand the conditions of lives in the villages.

One thing you should understand is that, what he wrote, was his observation based on his short stay in Tanzania.We can agree with him by 98%, because we know both countries.
 
You can agree with him only if the granularity presented is deemed sufficient.

Others have objected. Deeming that granularity insufficient to warrant such wideranging conclusions.

Any agreement or disagreement is not meaningful if even the measuring granularity is not agreed upon.

It is like disagreeing or agreeing using different measuring units that have no conversion rate.
 
Yeye ameona hivyo.
Je wewe ulishazuru Kenya ukaoanisha na hayo maelezo na kututhibitishia kwamba aliyoyaeleza ni ya uongo?

Yeye kalinganisha umaridadi wa Tanzania na kwao Kenya na kukiri kuwa Tz ipo juu kwa kila aliloliona.

Sasa wewe siyo unabishi tu, bali hautaki! Isee waTz!
 
Hakuna Swahili version ya hii taarifa?
Sisi watanzania English hatuelewi sana kama kiswahili hivyo hapa umetufanya kuwa wanyonge...

Ila Kiukweli nafikiria kumshtaki mwalimu wangu Wa English maana najiona nililipa ada bure kabisa na English ikanipiga chenga au sijui nakwama wapi Mimi mwenzenu....
Rest easy my English!!!
 
Acha wivu....
Sifia tu palipo haki usijisikie vibaya maisha ndivyo yalivyo.
Sifa ya kuficha mapungufu umekosea kuwataja watz hiyo ni sifa kubwa ya wakenya na dunia inajua hilo...usihamishe magoli jirani....
 
Wivu mbaya sana jirani.....
Halafu ninyi MNA wivu na tz tu waganda hawawapi tabu kabisa...
 
Umeamua kuwa muongo sasa!!!
Huwezi sema hivyo ikiwa huna donge lakukereketa rohoni...
Pole sana kwa wivu unaokusumbua, watz wanatambua ninyi ni wenye wivu sana hasa mlioko humu mitandanoni lakini wale halisi wanatambua who is Tanzania...
 
Where is your Swahili?
If not seen please do it in Sukuma....
 
What you fail to understand is that, this is not a research or formal collection of data, whereby someone needs to use scientific approach, then you can agree or disagree scientifically. How can you challenge scientifically while the method used is not scientific one?.

We all know different methods of conducting researches, or formal way of collecting data, these have got their principles and laws which govern those procedures, if someone decides to use these, the he/she is obliged to use those what you are suggesting here, other wise if he/she decides to use informal means of collection, then his/her observation remains to be informal conclusion/observation which should not be challenged scientifically.
 
Why do you need consesus in standards to have meaningful comparisons only in scientific circles?

If this is not a research or formal collection of data, and the author claims it is neither, why are you criticizing it as if it is?
 
Kenya watu wanaishi kwenye Estates na Apartments sio kama huku bongo tunaishi kwenye mapango na matundu ya njiwa au juu ya miti
Usijisumbue bure watz tumeshajua mnapoishi wakenya !!! Inashangaza kumsikia mkenya akisema haya maneno" KENYA YETU" Kenya inawenyewe ,tena ni wakikuyu ,tena siyo wakikuyu wote, tena wakikuyu wenye Kenya yao hawazisi laki 2,
 
Why do you need consesus in standards to have meaningful comparisons only in scientific circles?

If this is not a research or formal collection of data, and the author claims it is neither, why are you criticizing it as if it is?
The fact that he tries to explain what he saw in TZ vs KE, it can easily challenged by a person who also visited these two countries and did the same observation voluntarily, and volunteered to share his/her opinion unprovoked. Not through scientific means, because the whole exercised was not scientifically prepared.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…