Herbalist Dr MziziMkavu
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 3, 2009
- 42,322
- 33,126
The CCM and their politicking would determine what would happen and
who becomes what, they have their own basis of choosing who flies
their flag but Tanzania is bigger than the CCM and options regarding
who becomes the President of Tanzania, are absolutely in the hands of
Tanzanians not a political party.
If we are talking about the development of the country our focus
should not be on any party but rather on competent hands that could
stir changes irrespective of platform or whatever case. A party can
field a candidate but it is left for the electorate to decide what
happens, the Tanzania we are working to have is beyond the confines of
a political party; rather a sound democracy with formidable team
players that are abreast with the rules and regulations of the game;
after all we are working on a multiparty system and equally the
provision of independent candidature. Our discourse should go beyond
hypothesis rather substance and reality. We should stop being fast and
study situations critically and appreciate the permissible incentive
of politics, if not, who had imagined that Kikwete, Dr Slaa and Zitto
Kabwe would be what they are today. So you can see the dynamism of
God.
Tanzania would outlive Kikwete and CCM and so only Tanzanians can
determine and decide the kind of presidency they want. Part of our
crisis is our inability to collectively appreciate and guard the
tenets. So Kikwete or not Kikwete or any other person what Tanzania
needs is a moral and upright leader.
I must tell you this with full sincerity that our views hinge largely
on full application and practice of democracy. Democracy is a game of
numbers and of bringing out the best of ambitious people to manage the
affairs of a given state. Tanzania is an inseparable federation whose
presidency would always be a national one irrespective of where the
head of the ship hail from. And mark you, there cannot be a complete
Union Presidency or Zanzibar Presidency, there can only be Tanzanian
Presidency no matter where the President comes from. There is no
Tanzanian that only his region and kith and kin can make him a
President; alliances must be involved in the process. In principle,
the very moment someone brings sentiment in a robust competition of
governance, he or she has shown sign of failure and incompetence as a
basis to derive advantage.
My position here is simple, let the best material be given the
mandate to govern us not only on the Presidency alone, but from
councilor to the top. Even though we have our natural sentiments but I
can tell you that national interest and common good superseded our
personal interest.
who becomes what, they have their own basis of choosing who flies
their flag but Tanzania is bigger than the CCM and options regarding
who becomes the President of Tanzania, are absolutely in the hands of
Tanzanians not a political party.
If we are talking about the development of the country our focus
should not be on any party but rather on competent hands that could
stir changes irrespective of platform or whatever case. A party can
field a candidate but it is left for the electorate to decide what
happens, the Tanzania we are working to have is beyond the confines of
a political party; rather a sound democracy with formidable team
players that are abreast with the rules and regulations of the game;
after all we are working on a multiparty system and equally the
provision of independent candidature. Our discourse should go beyond
hypothesis rather substance and reality. We should stop being fast and
study situations critically and appreciate the permissible incentive
of politics, if not, who had imagined that Kikwete, Dr Slaa and Zitto
Kabwe would be what they are today. So you can see the dynamism of
God.
Tanzania would outlive Kikwete and CCM and so only Tanzanians can
determine and decide the kind of presidency they want. Part of our
crisis is our inability to collectively appreciate and guard the
tenets. So Kikwete or not Kikwete or any other person what Tanzania
needs is a moral and upright leader.
I must tell you this with full sincerity that our views hinge largely
on full application and practice of democracy. Democracy is a game of
numbers and of bringing out the best of ambitious people to manage the
affairs of a given state. Tanzania is an inseparable federation whose
presidency would always be a national one irrespective of where the
head of the ship hail from. And mark you, there cannot be a complete
Union Presidency or Zanzibar Presidency, there can only be Tanzanian
Presidency no matter where the President comes from. There is no
Tanzanian that only his region and kith and kin can make him a
President; alliances must be involved in the process. In principle,
the very moment someone brings sentiment in a robust competition of
governance, he or she has shown sign of failure and incompetence as a
basis to derive advantage.
My position here is simple, let the best material be given the
mandate to govern us not only on the Presidency alone, but from
councilor to the top. Even though we have our natural sentiments but I
can tell you that national interest and common good superseded our
personal interest.
