Why UN and international community have never blamed Hamass?

[ZALEMDA]

I don't understand why UN and international community have never blamed Hamass Of :

1. Hiding in and using civilian infrastructures for war operations?

2. Why their soldiers are not wearing uniforms?

3. Why aids given previously to the rebuilding of the country was used for building terror tunnels?

4. Why killings and abducting innocent Israelis on October 7th.

5. Why abducting and sexually abuse Israel women till now?

6. Why preaching eradication of Israel people and its nation

 

[nyongolwe]

May be satan blinded them.

 

[FaizaFoxy]

I don't understand why UN and international community have never blamed Hamass Of :

1.hidind in and using civilian infractures for war operations?

2. Why their soldiers are not wearing uniforms?

3.why aids given previously to the rebuilding of the country was used for building terror tunnels?

4.why killings and abducting innocent Israelis on October 7th .

5.why abducting and sexually abuse Israel women till now?

6.why preaching eradication of Israel people and its nation

Andika Kiswahili, Kingereza bado sana kwako, kafanyie mazoezi kwengine.

Kwanini hamjivunii Kiswahili?

 

[ZALEMDA]

Andika Kiswahili, Kingereza bado sana kwako, kafanyie mazoezi kwengine.

Kwanini hamjivunii Kiswahili?

Mimi ndiyo sijui kingereza au wewe? Hahahahaa.

 

[FaizaFoxy]

Mimi ndiyo sijui kingereza au wewe? Hahahahaa.

Wewe.

 

[Intelligence Justice]

I don't understand why UN and international community have never blamed Hamass Of :

1.hidind in and using civilian infractures for war operations?

2. Why their soldiers are not wearing uniforms?

3.why aids given previously to the rebuilding of the country was used for building terror tunnels?

4.why killings and abducting innocent Israelis on October 7th .

5.why abducting and sexually abuse Israel women till now?

6.why preaching eradication of Israel people and its nation

I don't understand why the UN and the international community have never blamed Hamass Of:-

Answer: Because the UN was formed out of hatred in pretext for peace promotion, and protection of humankind lives from ruthless acts. UN is a toothless wolf upon some of the countries of the financial, economic, and military resources they have invested to run the international institution thereby a neo-colonialism iron rod to dependent nations

Flashback
a) After the first war symbolized WWI ended in 1919 several powerful nations formed (The League of Nations under the Treaty of Versailles "to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security")
b) The United Nations-UN was formed on October 24, 1945, whereas the planning and the hope of many years were thought to have materialized in an international organization designed to end the war and promote peace, justice, and better living for all mankind.

1. Hidind in and using civilian infractures for war operations?
Answer: Under international law, the term refers to civilians or other protected persons whose presence is used to render military targets immune from military operations. The use of human shields is forbidden by Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions and is considered a war crime as well as a violation of humanitarian law
In this context, Hamas (violent and cruel fighters) are intently violating the Geneva Convention liable for punitive action.
There are three kinds of human shields: Voluntary shields are people who willfully choose to stand in front of a legitimate target as a means of protection; Involuntary shields are people who are coercively deployed as bargaining chips or as a means to thwart an attack; and proximate shields are civilians or civilian sites that become shields or are cast as shields due to their proximity to the fighting
2. Why their soldiers are not wearing uniforms?
Answer: A fundamental premise of the Geneva Conventions has been that to earn the right to protection as military fighters, soldiers must distinguish themselves from civilians by wearing uniforms and carrying their weapons openly; in this case, Hamas fighters disguising in civilian casual clothing is a breach of the international laws out rightly.
In modern warfare, soldiers typically wear uniforms as a means of identifying their allegiance, rank, and role. Uniforms also provide protection and comfort in a combat environment contrary to which is a criminality offense.
However, on the other hand, dressing in civilian clothing is not a war crime unless you are engaged in trying to kill or capture the enemy at the time. Indiscriminately shooting unarmed civilians (in this case, your own) because enemy fighters wear civilian clothing, on the other hand.
3. Why aids given previously to the rebuilding of the country was used for building terror tunnels?
Answer: Crimes against humanity
For the denial of humanitarian assistance to become a crime against humanity, it would therefore need to be either systematic or widespread and based on a policy (Hamas has such a policy of superiority against civilians). The spontaneous looting of a warehouse containing relief goods by civilians or soldiers, or spontaneous attacks on relief convoys by a group of drunken soldiers. Isolated criminal conduct that brings about the blockade of relief is not a crime against humanity, but the hostile warfighters constitute a breach. The breakdown might have been orchestrated to hide the nature of the crimes — seemingly spontaneous acts are often the results of careful planning. Even if there is only a small number of victims, a crime against humanity may still be taking place as long as the “systematic” condition is fulfilled. In the event one aid worker would need to be killed to make all the agencies pull out of the region, thus leaving the population without assistance, this act could be construed as a crime against humanity, depending on the consequences of the act for the population. The possibility is that a single act may qualify as a crime against humanity if there is a link with a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.
The mental element required to be proven to constitute a crime against humanity is that the accused was aware of or wilfully blind to facts or circumstances that would bring his or her acts within crimes against humanity. It is not necessary, however, to establish that the accused knew that his actions were inhumane or that he knew exactly what would happen to the victims.
4. Why killings and abducting innocent Israelis on October 7th .
Answer: Killing and kidnapping is a warfare weapon against the rivals which was used by Hamas militants on the eve of October 7th, 2023 during Nova Music Festive in the south of Israel as an execution to exterminate the Israel Jews community in the Middle East
armed conflict to constitute a war crime, including: a) the perpetrator is a combatant;b) the victim is a noncombatant; c) the victim is a member of the opposing party;d) the act may be said to serve the ultimate goal of a military campaign, and e) the crime is committed as part of or in the context of the perpetrator’s official duties
5. Why abducting and sexually abuse Israel women till now?
Answer: There was no abduction but rather the kidnapping of innocent and unarmed civilians. Sexual abuse is a monster behavior.
Sexual violence and rape
International treaty lawContemporary international law treaties prohibit sexual violence, in both international and noninternational armed conflicts, but none of them offers a direct definition thereof. Some clarification of the crime of sexual violence is apparent in the text of the treaties and over the years there has been a certain pattern of evolution in defining the scope and elements of the crime. This has laid grounds for international tribunals to subsequently develop their own tailored definitions – the process which in turn has also been undergoing evolution.
All of the treaties emphasize additional protection towards the most vulnerable categories of victims, primarily women and children, against what is either implied or explicitly identified as acts of sexual violence
6. Why preaching eradication of Israel people and its nation
Answer: Extermination is normally interpreted as murder on a large scale. The UN International Law Commission explained the difference between murder and extermination as follows: “Extermination is a crime which by its very nature is directed against a group of individuals. In addition, the act of extermination involves an element of mass destruction which is not required for murder.” Unlike genocide, extermination also applies to situations in which some members of a group are killed while others are spared.
The denial of humanitarian assistance as a crime against humanity has been taken in the definition of extermination in the ICC Statute, which affirms that extermination “includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population”. The definition of torture as a crime against humanity seems to differ from its definition as a war crime. The Statute of the ICC contains the following definition: “Torture means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions. Depriving subsistence to warfare victim civilians is an inhumane act such as murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and torture. Second, the acts must cause injury to human beings in terms of physical or mental integrity, health, or human dignity; endangering the health and welfare of detainees by providing inadequate food, endangering the health and welfare of detainees by providing living conditions failing to meet minimal basic standards.
The international laws' lack of an explicit sexual violence definition in the treaty law created a challenge for the international criminal tribunals which have, in their jurisprudence, developed their own definitions for each particular case. In this connection, the crime of rape, which is commonly referred to by treaty law only as part of a broader category of “sexual violence”, has undergone its own development within the case law and received its definition. The below section will deal with some of the main elements of sexual violence, as developed in the case law of international courts.