Why first-born children are brighter than their siblings | JamiiForums | The Home of Great Thinkers

Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Why first-born children are brighter than their siblings

Discussion in 'Habari na Hoja mchanganyiko' started by zomba, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. zomba

    zomba JF-Expert Member

    Apr 14, 2008
    Joined: Nov 27, 2007
    Messages: 17,081
    Likes Received: 49
    Trophy Points: 0
    Why first-born children are brighter than their siblings

    Last updated at 01:06am on 14th April 2008


    The first-born is likely to be the smartest, according to research

    First-born children are more intelligent than their siblings, research has found.

    The oldest child is more likely to have a higher IQ, and the youngest likely to have the lowest, say researchers.
    Scientists at Vrije University, Amsterdam, studied 650 children whose IQs were tested three times until they were 18.

    Dorret Boomsma, whose work will be published in the journal Intelligence, said: "The effect is seen in boys and girls.

    "The highest IQ scores were in children without any older siblings, followed by children with one older sibling.
    "Children with two or more older siblings obtained the lowest score."

    Why this occurs is unclear but it is thought that the level of attention parents lavish on first-borns boosts their intellectual development.

    But while the oldest may be the brightest, another study shows the youngest is the most favoured.

    Research on 2,000 families by the University of California found first-borns are achievers, who are dominant, religious, conscientious and neurotic.

    Middle-borns are rebellious, less religious, impulsive and open to new experiences.

    Last-borns are agreeable, sociable and creative - and are often the most favoured child.

    Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=559437&in_page_id=1770
  2. BAK

    BAK JF-Expert Member

    Apr 14, 2008
    Joined: Feb 11, 2007
    Messages: 70,801
    Likes Received: 83,172
    Trophy Points: 280
    That is the reason why God chose them to be 1st borns in their family to lead his/her siblings, but some 1st borns are a waste i.e. they don't have any leadership characters.
  3. Tanzania 1

    Tanzania 1 Senior Member

    Apr 14, 2008
    Joined: Oct 4, 2007
    Messages: 197
    Likes Received: 8
    Trophy Points: 0
    I think if they conduct the same research in Africa or Asia, they might come up with totally different results, for the factors they considered might be common to only that specific part of the world. -- Lifestyles also matter a lot.
  4. mbarikiwa

    mbarikiwa JF-Expert Member

    Apr 14, 2008
    Joined: Mar 8, 2008
    Messages: 507
    Likes Received: 5
    Trophy Points: 35
    Eehee, tusiokuwa wa kwanza tulie tu.
  5. BiMkubwa

    BiMkubwa JF-Expert Member

    Apr 14, 2008
    Joined: Jan 9, 2007
    Messages: 530
    Likes Received: 12
    Trophy Points: 35
    for those who are not first borns but can attest that they are doing better than their older siblings, please raise your hands
  6. Killuminati

    Killuminati JF-Expert Member

    Apr 15, 2008
    Joined: Apr 24, 2007
    Messages: 321
    Likes Received: 11
    Trophy Points: 35
    Not me, i'm not the smartest in our family, our last born is!!Damn me!! Science can be deceiving sometimes!!whatch out