Uganda, Tanzania meet to finalise pipeline deal

Hiyoo projects hamna kitu hapo ni uwongo mtupu. ..Donors wote wamejitowa kutokana na unpredictable policy za jiwe na m7...total France oil company ndoo wadau 51% wameesepa nao

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Uganda Will Be Able to Get Oil-Pipeline Funding, Stanbic Says
By
Fred Ojambo
Tue Aug 06 2019 11:25:54 GMT+0200 (CEST)
  • Raising capital for $3.5 billion project ‘is not a problem’
  • Planned pipeline has faced opposition from lobby groups
SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share



Tweet



Post



Email
Uganda will be able to get the cash it needs to build a planned $3.5 billion oil-export pipeline, with financiers ready to commit funds as soon as a final investment decision is made, according to Stanbic Bank Uganda Ltd.


The project has attracted “a lot of interest” and raising capital “is not a problem,” Stanbic Chief Executive Officer Patrick Mweheire said Tuesday in Kampala. The pipeline, which is crucial to plans by Total SA, Cnooc Ltd. and Tullow Oil Plc to tap the country’s first oil, has faced opposition from lobby groups who have voiced concern over its potential environmental impact.


Uganda, with discoveries of 6 billion barrels of oil resources, is targeting the start of production in 2022, while the 216,000-barrel-a-day pipeline would begin operations the following year. The government has said that an FID to develop the finds and build the pipe could unlock as much as $20 billion of investment.



Standard Bank Group said in June it was reviewing a request by lobbyists to withdraw from funding the proposed pipeline. The lives of as many as 14,500 people along its route could be affected, according to the request, which was signed by organizations including U.K.-based Global Witness.


Stanbic and Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp. are the lead arrangers for financing of the 900-mile conduit, seeking to raise $2.5 billion in debt funding. Total, Cnooc and Tullow will also provide funds, as will the government.

“There are a lot of people sitting on the sidelines; funding for the pipeline can be raised,” Mweheire said. “We are all working collectively for FID.”
An investment decision on the pipeline, which would run from Hoima in Uganda’s oil region to the Tanzanian port of Tanga, is targeted later this year.

 

The wait is over: Uganda’s long road to first oil
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
The resolution of a tax dispute between the government of Uganda and oil companies clears the way for the long-awaited development of Ugandan oil, that will radically transform the country’s fortunes. Liam Taylorreports.
Oil deposits have sat beneath the shores of Lake Albert, in western Uganda, for millions of years. Since its discovery in 2006, plans to extract the oil, estimated at over 1bn recoverable barrels, have repeatedly stumbled over disagreements between the government and oil companies. The latest was a tax dispute that threw the whole project into limbo, holding up the commencement of commercial production. `
The argument turned on the transfer of assets between the three oil companies who are developing the fields: Total, a French supermajor, CNOOC, a Chinese state firm, and Tullow, an independent with headquarters in London. In 2017, Tullow announced it would sell on most of its interests in the Uganda project to its two larger partners, reducing its own stake to 11.76%.
In August this year, the companies and the government could still not agree how the $900m deal should be taxed. A sales agreement between the companies expired. The deal was off.
Uncertainty over the transaction has delayed a long-awaited final investment decision (FID) on the oil project, which was expected this year. Irene Muloni, the energy minister, now says that a decision will be reached by April 2020. It typically takes three years for oil projects to move from FID to first oil.
Meanwhile Total has suspended activity on the 1,445km pipeline that will carry Ugandan oil to the sea. Back in February its boss, Patrick Pouyanné, had quipped about the oil project’s numerous challenges. “There are many crocodiles in Lake Albert,” he said. “We need to domesticate the crocodiles before we move forward.” The story of Uganda’s oil suggests that those “crocodiles” will be hard to tame.
Tax disputes
Uganda has already been waiting a century for oil. The first formal survey around Lake Albert was conducted by a British team in 1925. Yoweri Museveni, the president, held meetings about oil with advisers two weeks after seizing power in 1986, and soon afterwards called off talks with oil companies while the country built its negotiating capacity.

At the time, most African oil exploration was off the Atlantic coast. When commercial quantities were finally discovered in three fields in the western part of the country in 2006 it was the largest onshore discovery in Africa for two decades.

“There is a lot of nonsense that oil will be a curse. No way,” said Museveni when he announced the find. Sensibly, the government did not rush to the market. It took time to pass relevant laws and recruit a team of competent technocrats. Museveni, a notorious micromanager, took a deep personal interest in negotiations with oil companies. He drove a hard bargain.

The most contentious issue was tax. In 2010 Heritage, the company that had done much of the initial exploration work, agreed to sell on its assets to Tullow. The government imposed a $434m capital gains tax bill, which Heritage disputed. A Ugandan court and an arbitration case in London both ruled in favour of the government, and Museveni later awarded a USh6bn ($1.6m) bonus to 42 officials who had helped in the case. A similar dispute arose when – in a foreshadowing of the current standoff – Tullow sold on part of its stake to Total and CNOOC. That matter was settled out of court in 2015.

Other tensions bubbled below the surface. Museveni wanted to refine oil locally. The oil companies wanted to export it, arguing that a small, inland refinery was economically unviable. In the end they agreed that up to 60,000 barrels per day – about a quarter of the total – would be refined in Uganda. The rest will be transported to the Tanzanian coast through the longest heated pipeline in the world.

Taming crocodiles
It was unsurprising, then, that Tullow’s 2017 decision should also run into problems. “The transaction which we have today is being looked at through the lenses of prior transactions,” says Denis Kakembo of Cristal Advocates, a law firm in Kampala with expertise in energy and tax.

The deal was structured so that Total and CNOOC would pay Tullow $200m in cash, and a further $700m towards its share of future development costs. But disagreements arose over several issues, such as how to account for the costs Tullow had already incurred between acquiring its Ugandan assets and selling them on. The government presented Tullow with a capital gains bill for $167m, which the company contested.

A compromise was reached after direct meetings between Museveni and Pouyanné. They agreed that Tullow would pay just $85m, with Total and CNOOC topping up the rest. They could not agree, however, about whether the two larger companies would inherit Tullow’s recoverable costs and count them against future tax obligations. That issue and others remained unresolved when the sale collapsed at the end of August.
The government put forward new proposals, which the firms have since accepted, Hanns Kyazze, a communications specialist at the ministry of energy and mineral development, told Reuters in December.

While the dispute has been resolved, the original sales agreement between the oil companies is dead; they will have to draw up another one, perhaps on fresh terms. Political attention is already turning to contentious elections in 2021.

The government also felt the cost of delay in its own pocket. It has poured money into roads, dams and airports on the promise of an imminent oil boom. A 2018 study by Sebastian Wolf, of the Overseas Development Institute, and Vishal Aditya Potluri, of the Harvard Kennedy School, forecasts that oil earnings will peak at 73% of the government’s non-oil tax revenues within a few years of coming on stream (assuming a price that starts at $77 a barrel and grows by 2% a year). Senior officials at the Bank of Uganda have warned that debts could become unsustainable if oil arrives late.

Everything now hinges on the final investment decision. “From the moment FID is announced, Uganda is going to change drastically,” says Hanns Kyazze, communications specialist at the energy ministry. Up to $20bn is expected to flow into the country to develop oil infrastructure.

But once a decision is finally reached, other challenges loom. Already, thousands of people in western Uganda have been displaced; some are contesting the resettlement package they received. Part of the oil lies below a national park.

In January six NGOs will challenge Total in a French court, claiming that it has failed to elaborate and implement its human rights and environmental vigilance plan. Uganda’s oil saga is just beginning.

d78b5ae7e839ac31c297b6ea0c2ab7ee

Written by African Business Magazine
African Business and its award-winning team is widely respected for its editorial excellence. We provide the all important tools enabling you to maintain a critical edge in a continent that is changing the world. Our special reports profile a wide range of sectors and industries including Energy, Oil and Gas, Aviation, Agriculture to name but a few.

 
3 Reactions
Reply
Back
Top Bottom