Tatizo si Kikwete na uelewa wake bali chuo kikuu alichosoma!

[Wikiliki]

Mleta mada hebu ataje mtu mmoja wa maana kutoka Mzumbe au DIT. Huyu jamaa alikosa admission Udsm sababu marks hazikutosha adi leo ana chuki. Kumbe Mzumbe nacho chuo kikuu! Sikujua.

 

[junior2008]

Katika hili hakuna ubishi kwamba wanaoshindwa kupata nafasi mlimani ndio wanaenda kwenye hivyo vyuo vingine (the peripherals) ambako hata walimu wao ni vilaza, wenye PhD za ku-forge na wengine wanaokotezwa mtaani. Pia wahitimu wengi wa UDSM (na ambao hawawezi kupata Lectureship UDSM kwa kuwa na GPA ndogo) ndio wanakuwa lecturers wa Mzumbe, DIT na kwingineko. Hii sio issue ya kuijadili kabisa kwasababu iko obvious ila hata kwenye best universities (e.g UDSM kwa Tanzania) lazima wawepo vilaza lakini vilaza hao hao ukiwapeleka Mzumbe, DIT, Tumaini wanakuwa vipanga! Kwahiyo tatizo sio chuo alichosoma bali ni Kikwete mwenyewe. Kumbuka pia sio wote waliosoma wameelimika na wako wengi wa aina hiyo regardless chuo anachosoma mtu!!

 

[Mwanaweja]

Kauli yako ina mapungufu ya aina mbili; kwanza ina mtizamo mgando. Ubora wa wahitimu katika miaka zaidi ya arobaini ya uhai wa chuo hicho, umekuwa ukihitirafiana siyo tu kwa fani moja na fani nyingine, lakini pia kwa mwaka hadi mwaka. Pili, kimsingi inalinganisha vitu viwili vilivyo tofauti. Katika hali halisi, wahitimu wa vyuo vya DIT na Mzumbe tangu mwanzo ilikusudiwa wawe watendaji (technitians), wakati wale wa mlimani walitegemewa wawe waratibu (coordinators). Ni kutokana na sababu hiyo, ndiyo maana baada ya kuhitimu DIT na Mzumbe walikuwa wanapewa diploma na mlimani digree. Tofauti kati ya diploma na digree, ni kwamba mtu wa diploma anazama zaidi katika eneo dogo, wakati mtu wa digree anafundishwa kwa lengo la kuwa na uelewa kwa maeneo mengi, ili aweze kuratibu kazi za wengine. Watu wengi huwa wanapotosha ukweli kwamba mtu anaweza akawa mwana taaluma tu kwa kujifunza darasani. Hii si kweli, ndiyo maana si sahihi hata kidogo kumwita JK mchumi au Pinda mwanasheria, kwasababu waheshimiwa hawa tangu wahitimu wamekuwa wakifanya mambo tofauti na fani zao.

good ndugu hapo umenena tukopamoja

 

[Kizibao]

Juzi nilikuwa nasoma CV ya Dr. Sally Kosgey, Waziri wa viwanda wa Kenya, nikashangaa kuona amesoma UDSM, nilipofuatilia nikagundua kuna wanasiasa na viongozi wengi wa Kenya wamesoma UDSM akiwemo AG Amos Wako, Bado mtasema UDSM ni ya Vilaza, UDSM ni chuo Bora Africka Mashariki, wapende wasipende!

Unamaanisha makerere mkuu na Nairobi university?

Source;;Ranking Web of World universities: Top Africa
nakubaliana na mtoa mada UDSM ni uozo mtupu wanafunzi wana crams tu na siyo creative

 

[Mwanaweja]

Katika hili hakuna ubishi kwamba wanaoshindwa kupata nafasi mlimani ndio wanaenda kwenye hivyo vyuo vingine (the peripherals) ambako hata walimu wao ni vilaza, wenye PhD za ku-forge na wengine wanaokotezwa mtaani. Pia wahitimu wengi wa UDSM (na ambao hawawezi kupata Lectureship UDSM kwa kuwa na GPA ndogo) ndio wanakuwa lecturers wa Mzumbe, DIT na kwingineko. Hii sio issue ya kuijadili kabisa kwasababu iko obvious ila hata kwenye best universities (e.g UDSM kwa Tanzania) lazima wawepo vilaza lakini vilaza hao hao ukiwapeleka Mzumbe, DIT, Tumaini wanakuwa vipanga! Kwahiyo tatizo sio chuo alichosoma bali ni Kikwete mwenyewe. Kumbuka pia sio wote waliosoma wameelimika na wako wengi wa aina hiyo regardless chuo anachosoma mtu!!

hapo ndugu umeenda isivyo naomba uangalie elimu ya SUA kama unabishi mpeleke mdogo wako au akasome MSc. au PhD uone mzikwake usichukulie vyuo UDSM ndio wako juu sana tunafanya nao kazi tunawaona majority hawana lolote ni jina tu

 

[tindikalikali]

Niliwah kutana na mtu wa TIA Akaniambia, udsm siwapend, wanajifanya wanajua, waongeaji na mengine yanayofanana na hayo, inshort ni wapenda sifa

 

[tindikalikali]

Sasa cna hakika kama hyo thread haitok kwa m2 wa aina hyo

 

[Mwanaweja]

Jamani jamani jamani hii mada tuwachie TCU ndio wenye dhamana ya elimu ya juu na mara zote kila muwamba ngoma kamba huvutia kwake,SAUT watsema wao ndo bora,na SUA watasema wao ndo bora ila ukweli ni kwamba usomi na utendaji ni vitu viwili tofauti.

safi sanaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! elimu ya darasani huongeza maarifa lakini akili ya kuzaliwa hubakia muhimu zaidi.

 

[LAT]

hapo ndugu umeenda isivyo naomba uangalie elimu ya SUA kama unabishi mpeleke mdogo wako au akasome MSc. au PhD uone mzikwake usichukulie vyuo UDSM ndio wako juu sana tunafanya nao kazi tunawaona majority hawana lolote ni jina tu

mkuu ... fanya comparison ya vyou kwa kutumia specific field of study.... sasa utampelekaje mtu anayetaka kusoma Law au Political science SUA....?

 

[Ng'wanangwa]

udsm wamewahi kuvumbua nini?

redet

 

[Straight]

Mkwere mwenyewe amegraduate kwa shida sana, na amepata gentle..

 

[Obe]

nadhani wahitimu wa vyo pale kariakoo ni bora katika tourism managment kuliko wahitimu wa UD tehetehe

 

[bagamoyo]

Kuna graduates wa-Tanzania wa UDSM(top-cream), Havard, Cambridge, Oxford, MIT lakini hatuoni tija toka kwao.

Swali la msingi kuwa kwa nini wasomi wa-Kitanzania sio chachu ya kuleta maendeleo na mabadiliko hata kama wako ktk nafasi za kiutendaji ndani ya Tanzania? wakienda nje wanakuwa chachu ktk nchi za kigeni lakini wakiweko nyumbani Tanzania tija hakuna, nini ni tatizo? Tutizame mojawapo ya mifano wasomi wetu na taasisi wanazojihusisha nazo na kama wamefanikiwa kutia chachu(ya kweli yaani mageuzi ya kimaendeleo kwa taifa) au la:

The Centre for Energy, Environment, Science and Technology-CEEST:
Prof. Mark Mwandosya- University of Birmingham - UK PhD (Electrical & Electronics Eng.) 1974 - 1977, Aston University - UK BSc. (Engineering) Hons. 1971 - 1974,
Prof Mathew Luhanga is a professor in telecommunications, linguistics and environmental engineering at the University of Dar es Salaam. ...
www.africanbookscollective.com/authors/matthew-l.-luhanga - Cached
B3-16 TIRDO Estates
Morogoro Stores
Oysterbay
P.O. Box 5511
Dar es Salaam
Tanzania
Email: ceest@ceest.com
Website: www.ceest.co.tz/
Type: Research NGO
Scope: national
Interest in Forestry: peripheral
Description
Ceest foundation is an independent research institution whose objectives are to undertake research and studies in areas related to energy, environment, science and technology. We have a massive experience in the above areas in particular technology and policy related research and studies in energy and environment, Environmental impact assessment (EIA) in energy, mining, etc, policy and technical/technological studies and advice in energy, mining, water resources and environment, Climate change studies and research, etc.
The Centre for Energy, Environment, Science and Technology (CEEST Foundation) was incorporated on 5th November 1992 as a Non-Governmental Organization. The idea to form the Foundation arose out of the realization of the need for an institution, which would look at issues of energy development, environmental protection, natural resource use and Management, and the development and use of science and technology in a holistic and balanced manner. The aim is to attempt to explore and exploit synergies and possible multiplier effects in order to complement efforts of other institutions and individuals as our countries strive to overcome backwardness and poverty.
The first year of the CEEST Foundation was mainly used in laying the foundation for the Foundation's Activities. In the following years the Foundation had to face challenges of the times and through the support of many people (including associates), collaborating institutions and its dedicated staff it has expanded its activities. The Foundation has been able to accomplish a number of research assignments, consultancies and studies as highlighted in coming sections. It has also organized and/or participated in a number of workshops and seminars.


ESRF(Economic and social research foundation): - Economic and Social Research Foundation: Tanzania
Prof. Samwel Wangwe, Dr. H. Bohela Lunogelo, Dr. Haji Semboja
Vision: To become a regional and international centre of excellence in capacity development for policy analysis and development management, policy research, and policy dialogue by year 2015.
Mission: Advancing knowledge to the public and private sector entities through sound policy research findings, capacity development and by advocating good development management practices. Specific Objectivesi)To undertake policy research and analysis to increase stakeholders' knowledge on major issues affecting society(ii)To strengthen capacity for policy research analysis and mainstream democratic governance through innovative capacity development initiatives such as training, outreach programmes, policy dialogue, (iii)To increase the awareness of national decision-makers on specific policy issues that affect communities. (iv)To facilitate debate and discourse on issues pertinent to the national development(v)To encourage national, regional and international networking and the creation of social capital around policy issues, (vi)To host national, regional and international policy research professionals and programmes

 

[Ubumuntu]

Ukweli ni kwamba wahitimu wengi wa Chuo kikuu cha Dar es salaam ni vilaza/wababaishaji [Si kikwete tu!]. Hii inatokana na jinsi wanavyofundishwa [wanakaririshwa na si kueleweshwa] watu wa aina hiyo huishia kuwa wenye nadharia nyingi kuliko utendaji. Mwisho wa safari huwa walalamishi wazuri sana. Chanzo kikuu cha kutoa vilaza ni kwamba Walimu/professors wa mlimani wamejaa wivu na husda!!!

Mwanafunzi aliyehitimu Mzumbe au DIT ni bora kuliko mhitimu wa Mlimani!! POLENI SANA WAHITIMU WA MLIMANI!!

Your view is too general. If you narrate in a specific scenario,then there might be some truth in your analysis.

Ila ujue kua mfumo wetu wa elimu ya juu toka kitambo ndo umefanya mambo yawe kama unavyodai. Kwani taasisi za elimu ya juu kama DIT,IFM,SUA,UCLAS na Mzumbe zilikua maalumu kwajili ya kuzalisha specific professionals ambao walipaswa kua practical and technical oriented. Hawa walizalishwa kukabiliana na mahitaji ya wataalamu katika nyanja mbalimbali. Ila si nyanja zote;kwani wataalamu wa sheria,uchumi na sayansi ya siasa waliandaliwa UDSM pekee.

UDSM ilikua ni sehemu ya kuzalisha watu wa kuwamanage na kuwasupervise hao wataalamu kutoka kwenye zile taasisi(nilizozitaja hapo juu).

Kwahiyo ndio maana unakuta mwanafunzi aliesomea civil,electrical or telecommunication engineering kutoka DIT(DarTech enzi izo) au MIT(MbeyaTech enzi izo) ni mzuri zaidi ya yule aliesomea UDSM. Huyo kutoka technical colleges anakua hana maneno na blah blah nyingi kama wa UDSM.

Lakini kwa taalamu nje ya izo zinazohitaji technical and mechanical capabilities,wahitimu wa UDSM walikua the best. Hususani kwenye nyanja za uchumi,sheria na sayansi ya siasa.

Hiyo sample yako ya mkwere ni ndogo sana kujustify your analysis. Kwani pengine mkwere ni kilaza (yeye kama yeye);hakua mwerevu darasani;huwezi kuconclude kua wahitimu wa UDSM wote ni vilaza.

Thus,in specific scenarios your analysis is very VAGUE and BLURRY!

 

[bwakea]

Ukienda mzumbe na vyuo vingeni labda kasoro SUA, atakuta asimia kubwa wa malecturers wamesoma UD, lakini ukienda UDSM hakuna lecturer aliyesoma/aliyetoka mzumbe, tumain saut etc. WHY?

 

[LAT]

UDOM je ... hii ndio cream balaa

 

[mfarisayo]

There are only 2 universities in TZ UDMS and SUA, May be now we can add ARU and MUHAS.
Vingine si vyuo vikuu ni VYOO VIKUU

 

[mfarisayo]

Ina maana mtoa mada anamaanisha Prof. Shivji naye ni kiliza? Kama naye ni kilaza je wa vyuo vingine wana hali gani?

 

[MAPINDUZI75]

Hii maada si mahali pake..Nadhan iende kwa waimba taarabu.

 

[Pokola]

Ni kweli kabisa watu waliosoma mlimani ni vilaza wa kutupwa na ndo viongozi wetu wengi sana wamepita hapo na angalia nchi walipoifikisha.

Uko sahihi kabisa ndugu. Una akili sana!

Angalizo:
Mjibu Mpumbavu sawa sawa na upumbavu wake, ili ajione mwenye hekima machoni pake. (Mithali 26:5)