Tanzania: Withdrawal of individual rights to African Court will deepen repression

Falconer

JF-Expert Member
Oct 14, 2008
881
508
The Tanzanian government has withdrawn the right of individuals and NGOs to directly file cases against it at the Arusha-based African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Amnesty International has established.

This withdrawal of rights will rob people and organisations in Tanzania a vital avenue to justice, in a country whose justice system is deeply flawed.
This move effectively blocks individuals and NGOs in the country from directly going to the court to seek redress for human rights violations in what is clearly a cynical attempt to evade accountability.
Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
“This move effectively blocks individuals and NGOs in the country from directly going to the court to seek redress for human rights violations in what is clearly a cynical attempt to evade accountability,” Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International’s Africa Advocacy Coordinator said.

“This is yet more evidence of the government of Tanzania’s growing hostility towards human rights and human rights defenders. It undermines the authority and legitimacy of the African Court and is an outright betrayal of efforts in Africa to establish strong and credible regional human rights bodies that can deliver justice and accountability.”
This is yet more evidence of the government of Tanzania’s growing hostility towards human rights and human rights defenders.
Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
Tanzania becomes the second country after Rwanda to withdraw the right of individuals and NGOs to directly access the African Court, a vital continental judicial body in the face of state interference in national justice systems.

The government of Tanzania has the highest number of cases filed by individuals and NGOs as well as judgments issued against it by the African Court. Out of the 70 decisions issued by the court by September 2019, 28 decisions, or 40 percent, were on Tanzania.
It undermines the authority and legitimacy of the African Court and is an outright betrayal of efforts in Africa to establish strong and credible regional human rights bodies that can deliver justice and accountability.
Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
Similarly, most of the cases still pending before the African Court are against Tanzania, a huge number of them on alleged violations of the right to fair trial, pointing to a systemic problem in the Tanzanian justice system.

Most recently, on 28 November, the African Court ruled that a section of the Tanzanian penal code which provides for mandatory death sentence in capital offences not only violates the right to fair trial and undermines judicial independence, but also the right to life.
The many cases filed against Tanzania at the African Court speak to the abject failure by the country to provide victims of human rights violations adequate and effective remedies nationally.
Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
“The many cases filed against Tanzania at the African Court speak to the abject failure by the country to provide victims of human rights violations adequate and effective remedies nationally, said Japhet Biegon.

“As the host of the African Court, Tanzania should lead by example and reconsider the decision to withdraw its declaration, demonstrating its support and commitment to the success of the court. It must also strengthen its own justice system to ensure victims of human rights violations can access justice at the national level.”

Background
The Tanzanian Minister of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, Prof Palamagamba Kabudi, signed the notice of withdrawal of the declaration made under Article 34(6) of the African Court Protocol on 14 November 2019. This notification was sent to the African Union on 21 November.

Tanzania’s decision to withdraw its Article 34(6) declaration comes barely a month after Amnesty International released a report detailing a spike in repression in the country under President John Magufuli.
 
Wazanzibar wameishitaki serikali kuhusu muungano. Kesi imewakalia vibaya watawala kiasi ya kwamba inabidi maamuzi magumu kama haya kufanyika. Laiti kesi ya wazanzibari kuhusu muungano itaendelea, serikali lazima isalimu amri na wananchi wazanzibari wapewe haki yao chini ya jumuiya ya umoja wa mataifa kujiamulia hatima yao.

Lakini lakusikitisha ni kuwa serikali wamechelewa sana kwenye hii process. Wao wanafikiri kuzuia Arusha wakati kesi yenyewe imetajwa katika kikao cha umoja wa mataifa na ndio walio pendekeza kesi ianze huku chini. Kwa hili, Palamagamba na Raisi wake wameteleza. Wangelitaka ushauri kwa mawakili wa katiba. Aibu kubwa kwa tanzania ambayo ndio ilisaidia kesi za Rwanda etc.
 
Dictators will never respond to these matamko, reports etc. They need to create an enforcing sort of machinery!
 
Wazanzibar wameishitaki serikali kuhusu muungano. Kesi imewakalia vibaya watawala kiasi ya kwamba inabidi maamuzi magumu kama haya kufanyika. Laiti kesi ya wazanzibari kuhusu muungano itaendelea, serikali lazima isalimu amri na wananchi wazanzibari wapewe haki yao chini ya jumuiya ya umoja wa mataifa kujiamulia hatima yao....
Mwanzo mzuri, lakini madikiteita huwa hawatishwi na hizo moves za kimataifa. Sasa kama watashinda kesi, how decree holders are going to enforce orders?
 
Dictators will never respond to these matamko, reports etc. They need to create an enforcing sort of machinery!
Yajayo na yaliyopo yanasikitisha. Mhu yetu macho na masikio. Pole kwa vizazi vya sasa ambavyo haviwezi kupigania haki zao. Sisi tumepitwa na wakati ingawa tulishaingia barabarani kudai haki na virungu tulipigwa sana tu.
 
Mwanzo mzuri, lakini madikiteita huwa hawatishwi na hizo moves za kimataifa. Sasa kama watashinda kesi, how decree holders are going to enforce orders?
Muhimusana maamuzi ya korti. Ikiwa korti imeamuwa referendum iwepo basi kwa hali yeyote referendum itakuwepo. Hiyo ni korti inatambulika kimataifa.Na kama alivokwenda Baba Taifa Addis ababa kuzungumzia muungano na wakamshangaa maraisi wengi wa kiafrika bila shaka wazanzibari watajuwa NEXT STEP.
 
Your fake reports is what is forcing the government to take an action. How can you just write a page without substantiating your claims with data. We are not to freaky to know the sense of direction.
 
Your fake reports is what is forcing the government to take an action. How can you just write a page without substantiating your claims with data. We are not to freaky to know the sense of direction.
Watu kama nyinyi muko nyuma sana ndio maana mukabaki na chorus za CCM. Mukiimbiwa munafuata kama kasuku.
 
Tanzania: Withdrawal of individual rights to African Court will deepen repression

The Tanzanian government has withdrawn the right of individuals and NGOs to directly file cases against it at the Arusha-based African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Amnesty International has established.

This withdrawal of rights will rob people and organizations in Tanzania a vital avenue to justice, in a country whose justice system is deeply flawed.

This move effectively blocks individuals and NGOs in the country from directly going to the court to seek redress for human rights violations in what is clearly a cynical attempt to evade accountability.

Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
“This move effectively blocks individuals and NGOs in the country from directly going to the court to seek redress for human rights violations in what is clearly a cynical attempt to evade accountability,” Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International’s Africa Advocacy Coordinator said.

“This is yet more evidence of the government of Tanzania’s growing hostility towards human rights and human rights defenders. It undermines the authority and legitimacy of the African Court and is an outright betrayal of efforts in Africa to establish strong and credible regional human rights bodies that can deliver justice and accountability.”

This is yet more evidence of the government of Tanzania’s growing hostility towards human rights and human rights defenders.
Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator

Tanzania becomes the second country after Rwanda to withdraw the right of individuals and NGOs to directly access the African Court, a vital continental judicial body in the face of state interference in national justice systems.

The government of Tanzania has the highest number of cases filed by individuals and NGOs as well as judgments issued against it by the African Court. Out of the 70 decisions issued by the court by September 2019, 28 decisions, or 40 percent, were on Tanzania.

It undermines the authority and legitimacy of the African Court and is an outright betrayal of efforts in Africa to establish strong and credible regional human rights bodies that can deliver justice and accountability.

Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
Similarly, most of the cases still pending before the African Court are against Tanzania, a huge number of them on alleged violations of the right to fair trial, pointing to a systemic problem in the Tanzanian justice system.

Most recently, on 28 November, the African Court ruled that a section of the Tanzanian penal code which provides for mandatory death sentence in capital offences not only violates the right to fair trial and undermines judicial independence, but also the right to life.

The many cases filed against Tanzania at the African Court speak to the abject failure by the country to provide victims of human rights violations adequate and effective remedies nationally.

Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International's Africa Advocacy Coordinator
“The many cases filed against Tanzania at the African Court speak to the abject failure by the country to provide victims of human rights violations adequate and effective remedies nationally, said Japhet Biegon.

“As the host of the African Court, Tanzania should lead by example and reconsider the decision to withdraw its declaration, demonstrating its support and commitment to the success of the court. It must also strengthen its own justice system to ensure victims of human rights violations can access justice at the national level.”

Background

The Tanzanian Minister of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, Prof Palamagamba Kabudi, signed the notice of withdrawal of the declaration made under Article 34(6) of the African Court Protocol on 14 November 2019. This notification was sent to the African Union on 21 November.

Tanzania’s decision to withdraw its Article 34(6) declaration comes barely a month after Amnesty International released a report detailing a spike in repression in the country under President John Magufuli.

Source: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/12/tanzania-withdrawal-of-individual-rights-to-african-court-will-deepen-repression/
 
Acha tujiondoe tu hao wanaojiita human rights wanakuwa financed na Marekani lakini cha ajabu US wala si wanachama wa ICC wanasema hawataki kuingiliwa legal system zao ila wao wanataka waingilie legal system za nchi zingine kupitia hao Amnesty Imternational.
 
Huu utawala uleta aibu kubwa sana kimataifa
Aibu ipi mkuu? Hivi unajua kuwa hao Amnesty International ni puppets wa US? Cha ajabu US hawataki kujiunga hata ICC kwa kisingizio kuwa hawataki legal system zao ziingiliwe lakini wao wanataka kuingilia legal system za nchi zingine kupitia hao Amnesty!
 
Na ICC mtajitoa lini kezi zaidi ya kumi zimeshapokelewa na zimeshasajiliwa. Mbio za sakafuni huishia ukingoni.
 
Aibu ipi mkuu? Hivi unajua kuwa hao Amnesty International ni puppets wa US? Cha ajabu US hawataki kujiunga hata ICC kwa kisingizio kuwa hawataki legal system zao ziingiliwe lakini wao wanataka kuingilia legal system za nchi zingine kupitia hao Amnesty!
Ndo umejua leo? Kwann mlisaini?
 
Aibu ipi mkuu? Hivi unajua kuwa hao Amnesty International ni puppets wa US? Cha ajabu US hawataki kujiunga hata ICC kwa kisingizio kuwa hawataki legal system zao ziingiliwe lakini wao wanataka kuingilia legal system za nchi zingine kupitia hao Amnesty!
Marekani ina taasisi imara za kimahakama.

Hata wasipojiunga ICC hauwezi kuwa na lepe la shaka kwamba mahakama za ndani zitababaishwa na wanasiasa.

Huko kwenye nchi ya mfalme juha, majaji wote wametiwa kwenye kapu. Mahakama inaendeshwa kama genge la nyanya.

Lazima tuwe na mbadala wa mahakama huru na yenye INTEGRITY kama ICC.

Mahakama za mfalme juha ni duni mno na haziaminiki.

Usilinganishe kabisa mfumo wa mahamaka wa marekani na Danganyika Republic.

Hebu ona Trump anavyohaha kama mwendawazimu.

Kama ingekuwa Tanganyika, jaji anapewa kimemo tu kwenye whatsapp anaanza kujinyea.

Kimemo chenyewe kimeandikwa na makonda. Katoto cha UVCCM!
 
The Tanzanian government has withdrawn the right of individuals and NGOs to directly file cases against it at the Arusha-based African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Amnesty International has established.

This withdrawal of rights will rob people and organisations in Tanzania a vital avenue to justice, in a country whose justice system is deeply flawed.

“This move effectively blocks individuals and NGOs in the country from directly going to the court to seek redress for human rights violations in what is clearly a cynical attempt to evade accountability,” Japhet Biegon, Amnesty International’s Africa Advocacy Coordinator said.

“This is yet more evidence of the government of Tanzania’s growing hostility towards human rights and human rights defenders. It undermines the authority and legitimacy of the African Court and is an outright betrayal of efforts in Africa to establish strong and credible regional human rights bodies that can deliver justice and accountability.”

Tanzania becomes the second country after Rwanda to withdraw the right of individuals and NGOs to directly access the African Court, a vital continental judicial body in the face of state interference in national justice systems.

The government of Tanzania has the highest number of cases filed by individuals and NGOs as well as judgments issued against it by the African Court. Out of the 70 decisions issued by the court by September 2019, 28 decisions, or 40 percent, were on Tanzania.

Similarly, most of the cases still pending before the African Court are against Tanzania, a huge number of them on alleged violations of the right to fair trial, pointing to a systemic problem in the Tanzanian justice system.

Most recently, on 28 November, the African Court ruled that a section of the Tanzanian penal code which provides for mandatory death sentence in capital offences not only violates the right to fair trial and undermines judicial independence, but also the right to life.

“The many cases filed against Tanzania at the African Court speak to the abject failure by the country to provide victims of human rights violations adequate and effective remedies nationally, said Japhet Biegon.

“As the host of the African Court, Tanzania should lead by example and reconsider the decision to withdraw its declaration, demonstrating its support and commitment to the success of the court. It must also strengthen its own justice system to ensure victims of human rights violations can access justice at the national level.”

Background
The Tanzanian Minister of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation, Prof Palamagamba Kabudi, signed the notice of withdrawal of the declaration made under Article 34(6) of the African Court Protocol on 14 November 2019. This notification was sent to the African Union on 21 November.

Tanzania’s decision to withdraw its Article 34(6) declaration comes barely a month after Amnesty International released a report detailing a spike in repression in the country under President John Magufuli.
Criminals always evade justice.
 
Back
Top Bottom