S-400: Kwanini nchi nyingi zataka kuinunua ikiwemo Saudia Arabia, Qatar, India, Turkey na China

[Cassablanca]

Unafananisha S400 ya 2007 na PAC-3 ya miaka 80 sijui 90!!!!! Fananisha S400 na THAAD ya 2008THAAD ya Mmarekani Radar coverage yake ni 600-3000km.
THAAD Radar Ranges (July 17, 2016)

X-band ground-based radar that comes with THAAD can detect, classify and identify threats of incoming missiles "at ranges up to 1,000 km," the USFK said in its yearly magazine titled "Strategic Digest," published jointly by the United Nations Command and the Combined Forces Command.

China has been voicing strong opposition to the THAAD installment, saying that its radar could spy on its military facilities and hurt its security interests.

The maximum radar range unveiled by the USFK could theoretically cover North Korea and some parts of China from the site for the THAAD battery.

S-400 & THAAD

The US-built THAAD is an effective missile defense system whose capabilities of downing ballistic missiles in terms of intercept altitudes and ranges surpass its the rivals. However it is strictly an anti-missile system, which can hit targets only at very high altitudes (minimum 40-50 km) which makes it useless against fighter jets or long range strategic aircraft. THAAD is not an air defense missile like S-400 or Patriot.

“Countries seeking effective defense against aircraft and missiles will have to buy two costly American systems – Patriot and THAAD, while the Russian S-400 can unite their functions. S-400 can also hit difficult ballistic targets at distances up to 60 km, The ability to shoot down the high-speed targets of S-400 almost equals THAAD (around 17 km/hour),” a defense industry source said.

Increasing US aircraft activity in the South China Sea is believed to have forced China to buy the S-400 from Russia; in the process acknowledging that its own home-grown air defense system were not sufficient to counter sophisticated US aircraft such as the F-35 and F-22. China, which is the first international customer to receive the S-400 is scheduled to test fire the system in August or September 2018.

An ace up the sleeve of the 4 S-400 is said to be its ability to detect stealth aircraft such as the F-35 and Chinese J-20 which are characterized by a low radar signature. Exact how effective is this stealth objects detection capability is not known. But suffice to say there is genuine concern among western commentators that the S-400 could covert the F-35 which took some US$396 billion to develop, into a regular 4th generation aircraft effectively negating its tech and price advantage. The same would apply to the Chinese J-20 if the S-400 were to be purchased by India.


Battle of the Air Defense Systems: S-400 Vs Patriot and THAAD

 

[Nantahulila]

nop najaribu tuu kuwambia watu USA sio kitu kwa Russia kwa upande wa jeshi lkn!!

Lkn tukiangalia military indices tunaambiwa Urusi iko chini USA

 

[Cassablanca]

Fananisha S400 na THAAD ya 2008THAAD .

Is THAAD Suitable for India? As the U.S. Offers its Own Air Defence System to Replace the Russian S-400, How Do They Compare in there Ability to Secure Indian Airspace

One of the primary reasons why India sought the Russian S-400, a platform designed with advanced anti stealth capabilities to counter American fighters such as the F-22 Raptor, was to protect the country’s airspace against the growing Chinese stealth fighter fleet. Alongside the Chinese J-20 air superiority fighterand upcoming J-31 medium fighter, H-20 bomber, and several cutting edge stealth drones, China is also reportedly aiding Pakistan on India’s Western border to develop its own light stealth fighter - under a joint fifth generation fighter program similar to the fourth generation JF-17. Unlike the S-400, THAAD not only lacks counter stealth capabilities - but it also lacks anti aircraft capabilities entirely and is designed solely to intercept enemy ballistic missiles. This seriously limits its usefulness to India.

While the S-400 is capable of deploying five different missile types, from the 40km range 9M96E specialised counter stealth platform to the extreme range 40N6 which can target enemy aircraft with precision at ranges of up to 400km at hypersonic speeds, THAAD by contrast deploys only a single missile type. This means that unlike the S-400, the American system is incapable of providing multi layered air defence of Indian airspace.

Missiles launched by the THAAD notably carry no warheads, and are restricted to ranges of approximately 200km - half the range of the S-400. This means that not only are the weapons more expensive, but more batteries will be needed to cover the area of India’s borders. Unlike the S-400, THAAD will be unable to engage hostile targets deep into enemy airspace - with an S-400 able to engage hostile targets across Pakistan and much of China.

An analysis of THAAD’s capabilities indicate that the system is likely poorly suited to India’s defence needs, and a poor substitute to the S-400. As its name suggests, the missile system is designed to intercept missiles at high altitudes which while valuable for the defence of the U.S. mainland from intercontinental range ballistic missiles, will have few applications against short ranged missiles deployed by China and Pakistan. Alongside their fighter and bomber fleets, these missiles will be able to pass through a THAAD defence shield unimpeded. Unlike the highly versatile S-400, THAAD is restricted to targeting enemy missiles at altitudes of 40-160km, while against short and intermediate missiles such as the Pakistani Ghauri and Chinese Dongfeng 12 the system would be effectively useless. This was attested to by numerous experts including former U.S. Chief of Naval Operations science advisor Theodore Postol, who noted that against such missiles “the THAAD defence can be expected to provide … no useful defence capability.” The historically poor performance of U.S. made air defences, both in testing and in combat against relatively basic pre-Vietnam War era missiles, is another factor which must be taken into account which indicates that the reliability of THAAD may well also be highly questionable.

Based on an analysis of its capabilities therefore, the THAAD system will be a poor choice for India - an air defence platform wholly incapable of replacing the S-400 not only in its ability to target advanced enemy stealth aircraft - but in its ability to provide any defence against enemy fighters, bombers and short and intermediate range ballistic missiles whatsoever.

 

[Upepo wa Pesa]

Tanzania na sisi tununue..

Kabombadia tu kametutoa jasho sasa huu mtambo si tutakufa njaa?

 

[Upepo wa Pesa]

Kwa niaba ya warusi wote wa jf nachukua nafasi hii kumpongeza bwana putin.

 

[xng hua]

Lkn tukiangalia military indices tunaambiwa Urusi iko chini USA

kisa? sababu?

 

[xng hua]

Is THAAD Suitable for India? As the U.S. Offers its Own Air Defence System to Replace the Russian S-400, How Do They Compare in there Ability to Secure Indian Airspace

One of the primary reasons why India sought the Russian S-400, a platform designed with advanced anti stealth capabilities to counter American fighters such as the F-22 Raptor, was to protect the country’s airspace against the growing Chinese stealth fighter fleet. Alongside the Chinese J-20 air superiority fighterand upcoming J-31 medium fighter, H-20 bomber, and several cutting edge stealth drones, China is also reportedly aiding Pakistan on India’s Western border to develop its own light stealth fighter - under a joint fifth generation fighter program similar to the fourth generation JF-17. Unlike the S-400, THAAD not only lacks counter stealth capabilities - but it also lacks anti aircraft capabilities entirely and is designed solely to intercept enemy ballistic missiles. This seriously limits its usefulness to India.

While the S-400 is capable of deploying five different missile types, from the 40km range 9M96E specialised counter stealth platform to the extreme range 40N6 which can target enemy aircraft with precision at ranges of up to 400km at hypersonic speeds, THAAD by contrast deploys only a single missile type. This means that unlike the S-400, the American system is incapable of providing multi layered air defence of Indian airspace.

Missiles launched by the THAAD notably carry no warheads, and are restricted to ranges of approximately 200km - half the range of the S-400. This means that not only are the weapons more expensive, but more batteries will be needed to cover the area of India’s borders. Unlike the S-400, THAAD will be unable to engage hostile targets deep into enemy airspace - with an S-400 able to engage hostile targets across Pakistan and much of China.

An analysis of THAAD’s capabilities indicate that the system is likely poorly suited to India’s defence needs, and a poor substitute to the S-400. As its name suggests, the missile system is designed to intercept missiles at high altitudes which while valuable for the defence of the U.S. mainland from intercontinental range ballistic missiles, will have few applications against short ranged missiles deployed by China and Pakistan. Alongside their fighter and bomber fleets, these missiles will be able to pass through a THAAD defence shield unimpeded. Unlike the highly versatile S-400, THAAD is restricted to targeting enemy missiles at altitudes of 40-160km, while against short and intermediate missiles such as the Pakistani Ghauri and Chinese Dongfeng 12 the system would be effectively useless. This was attested to by numerous experts including former U.S. Chief of Naval Operations science advisor Theodore Postol, who noted that against such missiles “the THAAD defence can be expected to provide … no useful defence capability.” The historically poor performance of U.S. made air defences, both in testing and in combat against relatively basic pre-Vietnam War era missiles, is another factor which must be taken into account which indicates that the reliability of THAAD may well also be highly questionable.

Based on an analysis of its capabilities therefore, the THAAD system will be a poor choice for India - an air defence platform wholly incapable of replacing the S-400 not only in its ability to target advanced enemy stealth aircraft - but in its ability to provide any defence against enemy fighters, bombers and short and intermediate range ballistic missiles whatsoever.[/QUOTE
]
asipo elewa basi anakichwa kigumu

 

[ze kokuyo]

Safi kaka naona kwa nondo hii ngoma 0-0 maana wametupelekesha balaa

Hahaha

 

[ze kokuyo]

View attachment 891873
S-400 & THAAD

The US-built THAAD is an effective missile defense system whose capabilities of downing ballistic missiles in terms of intercept altitudes and ranges surpass its the rivals. However it is strictly an anti-missile system, which can hit targets only at very high altitudes (minimum 40-50 km) which makes it useless against fighter jets or long range strategic aircraft. THAAD is not an air defense missile like S-400 or Patriot.

“Countries seeking effective defense against aircraft and missiles will have to buy two costly American systems – Patriot and THAAD, while the Russian S-400 can unite their functions. S-400 can also hit difficult ballistic targets at distances up to 60 km, The ability to shoot down the high-speed targets of S-400 almost equals THAAD (around 17 km/hour),” a defense industry source said.

Increasing US aircraft activity in the South China Sea is believed to have forced China to buy the S-400 from Russia; in the process acknowledging that its own home-grown air defense system were not sufficient to counter sophisticated US aircraft such as the F-35 and F-22. China, which is the first international customer to receive the S-400 is scheduled to test fire the system in August or September 2018.

An ace up the sleeve of the 4 S-400 is said to be its ability to detect stealth aircraft such as the F-35 and Chinese J-20 which are characterized by a low radar signature. Exact how effective is this stealth objects detection capability is not known. But suffice to say there is genuine concern among western commentators that the S-400 could covert the F-35 which took some US$396 billion to develop, into a regular 4th generation aircraft effectively negating its tech and price advantage. The same would apply to the Chinese J-20 if the S-400 were to be purchased by India.


Battle of the Air Defense Systems: S-400 Vs Patriot and THAAD

Kwanza unachotakiwa kujua ni kwamba S-400 hizo 400km za kutungua ndege ni za kwenye karatasi bado sababu makombora yake ya Aina hiyo ambayo ni 40N6 bado yapo kwenye majaribio.
Kombora lake la umbali mrefu kwa Sasa ni la 250km (48N6 missile)

New missile 49N6 for Russian S-400 air defense system in final stage | weapons defence industry military technology UK | analysis focus army defence military industry army

 

[ze kokuyo]

Is THAAD Suitable for India? As the U.S. Offers its Own Air Defence System to Replace the Russian S-400, How Do They Compare in there Ability to Secure Indian Airspace

One of the primary reasons why India sought the Russian S-400, a platform designed with advanced anti stealth capabilities to counter American fighters such as the F-22 Raptor, was to protect the country’s airspace against the growing Chinese stealth fighter fleet. Alongside the Chinese J-20 air superiority fighterand upcoming J-31 medium fighter, H-20 bomber, and several cutting edge stealth drones, China is also reportedly aiding Pakistan on India’s Western border to develop its own light stealth fighter - under a joint fifth generation fighter program similar to the fourth generation JF-17. Unlike the S-400, THAAD not only lacks counter stealth capabilities - but it also lacks anti aircraft capabilities entirely and is designed solely to intercept enemy ballistic missiles. This seriously limits its usefulness to India.

While the S-400 is capable of deploying five different missile types, from the 40km range 9M96E specialised counter stealth platform to the extreme range 40N6 which can target enemy aircraft with precision at ranges of up to 400km at hypersonic speeds, THAAD by contrast deploys only a single missile type. This means that unlike the S-400, the American system is incapable of providing multi layered air defence of Indian airspace.

Missiles launched by the THAAD notably carry no warheads, and are restricted to ranges of approximately 200km - half the range of the S-400. This means that not only are the weapons more expensive, but more batteries will be needed to cover the area of India’s borders. Unlike the S-400, THAAD will be unable to engage hostile targets deep into enemy airspace - with an S-400 able to engage hostile targets across Pakistan and much of China.

An analysis of THAAD’s capabilities indicate that the system is likely poorly suited to India’s defence needs, and a poor substitute to the S-400. As its name suggests, the missile system is designed to intercept missiles at high altitudes which while valuable for the defence of the U.S. mainland from intercontinental range ballistic missiles, will have few applications against short ranged missiles deployed by China and Pakistan. Alongside their fighter and bomber fleets, these missiles will be able to pass through a THAAD defence shield unimpeded. Unlike the highly versatile S-400, THAAD is restricted to targeting enemy missiles at altitudes of 40-160km, while against short and intermediate missiles such as the Pakistani Ghauri and Chinese Dongfeng 12 the system would be effectively useless. This was attested to by numerous experts including former U.S. Chief of Naval Operations science advisor Theodore Postol, who noted that against such missiles “the THAAD defence can be expected to provide … no useful defence capability.” The historically poor performance of U.S. made air defences, both in testing and in combat against relatively basic pre-Vietnam War era missiles, is another factor which must be taken into account which indicates that the reliability of THAAD may well also be highly questionable.

Based on an analysis of its capabilities therefore, the THAAD system will be a poor choice for India - an air defence platform wholly incapable of replacing the S-400 not only in its ability to target advanced enemy stealth aircraft - but in its ability to provide any defence against enemy fighters, bombers and short and intermediate range ballistic missiles whatsoever.

Russia alitengeneza S-400 ili kucounter air power ya US na Marekani alitengeneza THAAD kucounter makombora ya Urusi,hivyo THAAD tangu mwanzo ilitengenezwa kupangua makombora ya aina zote kuanzia short range ballistic missiles Hadi intermediate range missiles.

USA wakaja AEGIS ambayo inafungwa kwenye meli ikiwa na versions tofauti tofauti kuanzia (SM-1,SM-2,SM-6 na SM-3-ambayo hii baadae wanasema wataiboresha iweze kutungua ICBMs)
AEGIS pia imeunganishwa na F-35 hivyo inaweza kutumia data za F-35 kufanya interception. The F-35 just proved it can take Russian or Chinese airspace without firing a shot
F-35, SM-6 Live Fire Test Points to Expansion in Networked Naval Warfare
Hiyo SM-3 Range yake ni 2500km

RIM-161 SM-3Operational range700 km (378 miles) Block IA/B 2,500 km(1,350 miles) Block IIASpeed3 km/s (Mach 10.2) Block IA/B 4.5 km/s (Mach 15.25) Block

 

[Wycliff_Lowassa]

Labda tupate bwana atuhonge, kwa kununua wenyewe hatuwezi, kwanza tujihami tuna nini cha kutufanya tuvamiwe?

Mbona Kagame amenunua S-200 kwa Putin.

 

[Cassablanca]

Kwanza unachotakiwa kujua ni kwamba S-400 hizo 400km za kutungua ndege ni za kwenye karatasi bado sababu makombora yake ya Aina hiyo ambayo ni 40N6 bado yapo kwenye majaribio.
Kombora lake la umbali mrefu kwa Sasa ni la 250km (48N6 missile)

New missile 49N6 for Russian S-400 air defense system in final stage | weapons defence industry military technology UK | analysis focus army defence military industry army

Link uliyoweka ni ripoti iliyotelewa kitambo, mwezi wa 4 (April) na sasa ni mwezi wa 10 (October). Katika hiyo hiyo link imeelezwa hatua hiyo ya mwisho ktk uundwaji wa 49N6 itakamilika majira ya Summer ambapo huko Russia ni miezi ya June, July na August ambayo imeshapita. Sasa tupo mwezi wa 10 (October).

 

[Cassablanca]

Russia alitengeneza S-400 ili kucounter air power ya US na Marekani alitengeneza THAAD kucounter makombora ya Urusi,hivyo THAAD tangu mwanzo ilitengenezwa kupangua makombora ya aina zote kuanzia short range ballistic missiles Hadi intermediate range missiles.

USA wakaja AEGIS ambayo inafungwa kwenye meli ikiwa na versions tofauti tofauti kuanzia (SM-1,SM-2,SM-6 na SM-3-ambayo hii baadae wanasema wataiboresha iweze kutungua ICBMs)
AEGIS pia imeunganishwa na F-35 hivyo inaweza kutumia data za F-35 kufanya interception. The F-35 just proved it can take Russian or Chinese airspace without firing a shot
F-35, SM-6 Live Fire Test Points to Expansion in Networked Naval Warfare
Hiyo SM-3 Range yake ni 2500km

RIM-161 SM-3Operational range700 km (378 miles) Block IA/B 2,500 km(1,350 miles) Block IIASpeed3 km/s (Mach 10.2) Block IA/B 4.5 km/s (Mach 15.25) Block

Ulihitaji nikuwekee ulinganisho wa S-400 na THAAD, nimekuwekea wazi na namna ilivyo dhaifu kwa S-400. Na uzuri sikutumia maneno yangu binafsi, bali wachambuzi wanavyoieleza na pia case study nzuri ni India ambayo ilitaka kununua THAAD lakini ilipojifunza ubora wa S-400ikatupilia mbali THAAD na kuagiza S-400 pamoja na kutishiwa vikwazo na USA. Tujaalie wewe una bidhaa nzuri, si uwaache wateja wenyewe waamue kununua bidhaa yako, lakini sio kuwalazimisha wanunue bidhaa yako kwa vitisho.

 

[Cassablanca]

Marekani wana Hypersonic Rail guns. Urusi HANA.Watch the US Navy fire its game-changing hypersonic electromagnetic railgun

Hiyo railgun ya mmarekani pia ilikuwa yatestiwa kwa mara ya kwanza hapo. Fungua link yako uliyoweka na usome. Usipendelee kusoma vichwa vya habari tu, uwe wazama ndani kujua content ya link unayoiweka.

USA na Russia wote wako ktk utafiti wa utengenezaji wa Railgun. Hakuna ambaye kaishakamilisha, ila wote pia wameshafanya majaribio ya awali.

 

[ze kokuyo]

Link uliyoweka ni ripoti iliyotelewa kitambo, mwezi wa 4 (April) na sasa ni mwezi wa 10 (October). Katika hiyo hiyo link imeelezwa hatua hiyo ya mwisho ktk uundwaji wa 49N6 itakamilika majira ya Summer ambapo huko Russia ni miezi ya June, July na August ambayo imeshapita. Sasa tupo mwezi wa 10 (October).

Haijakamilika ingekua imekamilika wangeweka wazi na majaribio tumeyaona

 

[Cassablanca]

Haijakamilika ingekua imekamilika wangeweka wazi na majaribio tumeyaona

Matangazo ndio yale Putin aliyafanya ktk wargames mwezi uliopita na watu wakavutika kununua S-400 akiwemo India.

 

[ze kokuyo]

Ulihitaji nikuwekee ulinganisho wa S-400 na THAAD, nimekuwekea wazi na namna ilivyo dhaifu kwa S-400. Na uzuri sikutumia maneno yangu binafsi, bali wachambuzi wanavyoieleza na pia case study nzuri ni India ambayo ilitaka kununua THAAD lakini ilipojifunza ubora wa S-400ikatupilia mbali THAAD na kuagiza S-400 pamoja na kutishiwa vikwazo na USA. Tujaalie wewe una bidhaa nzuri, si uwaache wateja wenyewe waamue kununua bidhaa yako, lakini sio kuwalazimisha wanunue bidhaa yako kwa vitisho.

Hahaha... unafurahisha sana Mkuu,unasema THAAD dhaifu wakati Rada yake tu ni Mara mbili au tatu ya hyo S400,yaani THAAD inakuchungulia mpaka chumbani

Ni wapi India alisema anataka kununua THAAD?!

 

[ze kokuyo]

Matangazo ndio yale Putin aliyafanya ktk wargames mwezi uliopita na watu wakavutika kununua S-400 akiwemo India.

India hakununua S400 sababu ya wargames,Hilo deal lilikua la miaka na sababu kuu ni kutokana na kuongezeka kwa nguvu za China kijeshi hasa Jeshi la Anga. Pia kutokana na makombora ya Pakistan
Hizo habari za wargames kuvutia wateja ndo
India and Russia Ink S-400 Missile Air Defense System Deal
Kwanza nazisikia kwako,labda utupe chanzo

 

[ze kokuyo]

Hiyo railgun ya mmarekani pia ilikuwa yatestiwa kwa mara ya kwanza hapo. Fungua link yako uliyoweka na usome. Usipendelee kusoma vichwa vya habari tu, uwe wazama ndani kujua content ya link unayoiweka.

USA na Russia wote wako ktk utafiti wa utengenezaji wa Railgun. Hakuna ambaye kaishakamilisha, ila wote pia wameshafanya majaribio ya awali.

Sio Mara ya Kwanza,wamekua wakitest railguns tangu 2010,tena Hypersonic rail guns sio supersonic Kama za wengine
US Navy achieves '100 mile' hypersonic railgun test shot

 

[Cassablanca]

Marekani wana Hypersonic Rail guns. Urusi HANA.Watch the US Navy fire its game-changing hypersonic electromagnetic railgun

Kama nilivyokueleza ktk link yako ilikuwa ni jaribio la kwanza. Bali project hiyo ya kutengeneza railgun USA imeshaipiga chini baada ya kujitahidi zaidi ya miaka 10. Sababu ya kuipiga chini ni kuwa railgun hiyo ktk majaribio ilionekana kutumia energy kubwa lakini pia ilikuwa inalika yenyewe yenyewe inapotumiwa.

Railgun potentially cancelled: what went wrong for the US superweapon? - Naval Technology

The electromagnetic railgun has been in development for over a decade and has costed an estimated $500m, but according to recent reports from military veteran news outlet Task & Purpose, it could finally have the plug pulled on development.

The project faced two major complications. The weapon takes a colossal amount of power to fire, and it tears itself apart with use.

To date railgun demonstrations, while impressive, have not demonstrated an ability to fire multiple full power shots from the same set of rails. In a March 2014 statement, Chief of Naval Research Admiral Matthew Klunder claimed the weapon’s durability had increased from tens of shots to over 400. However, the ONR refused to confirm if these 400 shots were at the weapon’s maximum capacity.

The railgun’s power concerns are currently making it available on one new class of US destroyer. The problem is that the only ships that will be able to generate the 25 megawatts of power (enough to power almost 19,000 homes) required to fire the railgun are the Zumwalt-class destroyers, and only three will be produced due to budget considerations, down from the originally planned 32.