TUJITEGEMEE
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 6, 2010
- 23,914
- 23,075
WARUSI NA WACHINA WAONYESHA "UTU"....WAPINGA UDHALIMU WA SERIKALI ZA MAGHARIBI KWA NJIA YA VETO
Russia and China have vetoed the UN resolution on Syria
Russia and China have vetoed the UN resolution on Syria, urging political dialogue instead of proposed tough sanctions on Bashar al-Assad's regime. The move caused outrage from the US.
Members of the UN Security Council have voted on a draft resolution on Syria on Tuesday. The resolution was not passed with nine votes in favor, two against, and four abstentions, with Russia and China voting against the proposed resolution.
Russia's envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, said that Russia did not support the resolution because it was based on a totally different philosophy, "a philosophy of confrontation," and contained "an ultimatum of sanctions."
China's ambassador, Li Bandong, said his country had opposed the resolution because "sanctions, or threat of sanctions, do not help the situation in Syria but rather complicate the situation."
The US ambassador, Susan Rice, expressed "outrage" at the UN Security Council's failure to pass a resolution on Syria, saying that the "council has utterly failed to address an urgent moral challenge and a growing threat to regional peace and security."
"Today, two members have vetoed a vastly watered-down text that doesn't even mention sanctions," she added. "Those who oppose this resolution and give cover to a brutal regime will have to answer to the Syrian people – and indeed to people across the region."
In order for the resolution to be adopted, nine of the 15 Security Council members had to support it, with none of the veto-wielding members voting against.
The vote followed weeks of debate over whether to impose sanctions against Bashar al-Assad's regime. Many countries had been working on finding a text that could result in a compromise among the 15 Security Council members.
Earlier on Tuesday, Russia's deputy foreign minister, Gennady Gatilov, said that the current resolution was "unacceptable" as it envisaged sanctions and did not call on Assad's government to start talks with the opposition, Interfax news agency reported.
Many Security Council members do not want Syria to turn into another Libya. Russia and China cast a veto on resolution, as its text left the door open for further sanctions.
Russia repeatedly said that it would not support any text in a resolution that would leave the door open for sanctions, so Britain, France, Germany and Portugal dropped the word ‘sanctions' from their draft resolution.
The US, Turkey, and other countries had independently imposed sanctions against President Bashar al-Assad's regime. But all this time Russia was spearheading more negotiations, and rejected resolution drafts put forward by other UN members.
Protests in Syria erupted in March and during the government's harsh response more than 2700 people have since died, according to the UN's own figures.
China's and Russia's veto is very important and the correct decision, which will be beneficial for the peaceful settlement of the Syrian conflict, Xiang Songzuo, deputy director at Beijing's Center for International Monetary Research told RT.
Experience demonstrates that sanctions are not the best way to settle domestic conflicts, he stresses. "Only by peaceful dialogue we can bring stability and peace in Syria and other countries."
However, despite the veto there is a very strong likelihood of the US acting unilaterally in the conflict and taking action against Syria, Mr. Xiang insists.
Russia and China veto UN resolution on Syria — RT
Russia and China have vetoed the UN resolution on Syria
Russia and China have vetoed the UN resolution on Syria, urging political dialogue instead of proposed tough sanctions on Bashar al-Assad's regime. The move caused outrage from the US.
Members of the UN Security Council have voted on a draft resolution on Syria on Tuesday. The resolution was not passed with nine votes in favor, two against, and four abstentions, with Russia and China voting against the proposed resolution.
Russia's envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, said that Russia did not support the resolution because it was based on a totally different philosophy, "a philosophy of confrontation," and contained "an ultimatum of sanctions."
China's ambassador, Li Bandong, said his country had opposed the resolution because "sanctions, or threat of sanctions, do not help the situation in Syria but rather complicate the situation."
The US ambassador, Susan Rice, expressed "outrage" at the UN Security Council's failure to pass a resolution on Syria, saying that the "council has utterly failed to address an urgent moral challenge and a growing threat to regional peace and security."
"Today, two members have vetoed a vastly watered-down text that doesn't even mention sanctions," she added. "Those who oppose this resolution and give cover to a brutal regime will have to answer to the Syrian people – and indeed to people across the region."
In order for the resolution to be adopted, nine of the 15 Security Council members had to support it, with none of the veto-wielding members voting against.
The vote followed weeks of debate over whether to impose sanctions against Bashar al-Assad's regime. Many countries had been working on finding a text that could result in a compromise among the 15 Security Council members.
Earlier on Tuesday, Russia's deputy foreign minister, Gennady Gatilov, said that the current resolution was "unacceptable" as it envisaged sanctions and did not call on Assad's government to start talks with the opposition, Interfax news agency reported.
Many Security Council members do not want Syria to turn into another Libya. Russia and China cast a veto on resolution, as its text left the door open for further sanctions.
Russia repeatedly said that it would not support any text in a resolution that would leave the door open for sanctions, so Britain, France, Germany and Portugal dropped the word ‘sanctions' from their draft resolution.
The US, Turkey, and other countries had independently imposed sanctions against President Bashar al-Assad's regime. But all this time Russia was spearheading more negotiations, and rejected resolution drafts put forward by other UN members.
Protests in Syria erupted in March and during the government's harsh response more than 2700 people have since died, according to the UN's own figures.
China's and Russia's veto is very important and the correct decision, which will be beneficial for the peaceful settlement of the Syrian conflict, Xiang Songzuo, deputy director at Beijing's Center for International Monetary Research told RT.
Experience demonstrates that sanctions are not the best way to settle domestic conflicts, he stresses. "Only by peaceful dialogue we can bring stability and peace in Syria and other countries."
However, despite the veto there is a very strong likelihood of the US acting unilaterally in the conflict and taking action against Syria, Mr. Xiang insists.
Russia and China veto UN resolution on Syria — RT