Plato
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 28, 2010
- 420
- 94
The question itself imply that hawkins is cognisant of creation needless to say about the creator.if there is creation,then the creator is there "conditio sine qua non".
The ultimate question of life,can not be either fuly comrehended or satisfactorily answerd by hawkins for us who is himself proxmate and contigent, rather understood in the ultimate being, the "ens qua ens"
the grand design out of necessity have the designer who is also grand.if hawkins is even fighting newtons asertion,he can surely not be and he is not that grand designer.it goes without saying that it is God.
As for one paradox,he is the ass itself,before telling us about it.the creatus ex nihilo is an augustinian one centuries old than hawkins.i can not understand than that he(hawkins) not a fool himself, is speaking on behalf of the fools and the replies under that thread testifies to that.
The ultimate question of life,can not be either fuly comrehended or satisfactorily answerd by hawkins for us who is himself proxmate and contigent, rather understood in the ultimate being, the "ens qua ens"
the grand design out of necessity have the designer who is also grand.if hawkins is even fighting newtons asertion,he can surely not be and he is not that grand designer.it goes without saying that it is God.
As for one paradox,he is the ass itself,before telling us about it.the creatus ex nihilo is an augustinian one centuries old than hawkins.i can not understand than that he(hawkins) not a fool himself, is speaking on behalf of the fools and the replies under that thread testifies to that.
