jingalao
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 12, 2011
- 35,052
- 28,242
Nimetafuta kupitia google kuhusu gazeti hili la The economist na nikaona pamoja na mengi linaloandika lakini kuna mabaya kuhusu uandishi wao na maadili yetu kama watanzania.soma hizi comments ili uchukue msimamo.
Hasa hasa katika eneo la kijamii.
Economic issues: Usually but not always conservative. They prefer lower taxes and fewer regulations, and they approve of schemes such as privatization of government assets. However, they are very much orthodox economically, so they support Keynesian policies such as economic stimulus that some people see as left-wing. There are a few issues where they don't align to the right at all. For example they are strongly in favor of action to address climate change, whether through a cap-and-trade scheme or a carbon tax, even though it will require massive government intervention in the economy.
Social issues: Liberal in all cases that I can recall. They support gay marriage, reproductive rights, drug legalization (of all street drugs), legal prostitution, legal euthanasia, and civil rights in general. They support high levels of immigration, and for example in the US they support amnesty for illegal immigrants, they support universal healthcare (though they prefer private market delivery mechanisms). They believe in lowering prison populations and in liberal sentencing. And so on[B\]
Foreign Policy: They are strongly in favor of a world dominated by western values, and prefer the US to openly exert its influence in the world. But they are not always in favor of military action. They think Liberal Democracy is the best form of government and that US and western foreign policy should promote it. They are slightly, but not extremely, pro-Israel. In my experience, Foreign policy is the area where they are the most inconsistent. They seem to be alternately hawkish and dove-ish.
Hasa hasa katika eneo la kijamii.
Economic issues: Usually but not always conservative. They prefer lower taxes and fewer regulations, and they approve of schemes such as privatization of government assets. However, they are very much orthodox economically, so they support Keynesian policies such as economic stimulus that some people see as left-wing. There are a few issues where they don't align to the right at all. For example they are strongly in favor of action to address climate change, whether through a cap-and-trade scheme or a carbon tax, even though it will require massive government intervention in the economy.
Social issues: Liberal in all cases that I can recall. They support gay marriage, reproductive rights, drug legalization (of all street drugs), legal prostitution, legal euthanasia, and civil rights in general. They support high levels of immigration, and for example in the US they support amnesty for illegal immigrants, they support universal healthcare (though they prefer private market delivery mechanisms). They believe in lowering prison populations and in liberal sentencing. And so on[B\]
Foreign Policy: They are strongly in favor of a world dominated by western values, and prefer the US to openly exert its influence in the world. But they are not always in favor of military action. They think Liberal Democracy is the best form of government and that US and western foreign policy should promote it. They are slightly, but not extremely, pro-Israel. In my experience, Foreign policy is the area where they are the most inconsistent. They seem to be alternately hawkish and dove-ish.
