The Zionists controlling Wall Street and the presidential elections is not a good enough reason for selling out America and its pride in that shamefull way. There is more to this than we all think, a hell of a lot more, something big is hiding under the surface like an iceberg, something as big as 9/11 [h=2]Dr. Ashraf Ezzat[/h]September 26, 2011 [TABLE="class: tr-caption-container, width: 1"] [TR] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: tr-caption"]Bibi lecturing obama on the new realities in the Middle East in the Oval Room, May 2011 [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] It was only last May, when the arrogant and defiant Mr. Netanyahu arrived at the white house and lectured Mr. Obama, the president of the worlds super power about how wrong and irresponsible his mentioning, in the Middle East speech, of a two-state solution was, and specifically his call for a Palestinian state to be established as a sovereign state on the 1967 borders. It was such an embarrassment for the president of the United States sitting in his Oval Office/throne and being watched live and worldwide while Bibi was slapping him across the face and instructing him as to what to say, or not to say actually, when it comes to Israel. Reviewing that Oval Office spectacle, it was obvious that president Obama did earn his Nobel Prize, not for peace, but rather for keeping his peace and his incredible gift of anger management. And when the Palestinians lately arrived to the UN to submit their bid for statehood based on the 1967 border lines, Mr. Obama has surprised the world once again and proved that he righteously earned his Nobel Prize by displaying yet another genuine Christian virtue, namely turning the other cheek to be slapped once again If this recent Palestinian political initiative for statehood recognition hasnt been smartly and timely thought of and presented to the UN, the world would have been busy following and addressing seemingly more urgent matters. Meanwhile, the Palestinian plight would have stayed overshadowed by news like Europe and the United States slipping into recession, china bailing out Europe, the latest on the Arab spring drama and of course the upcoming American presidential elections(sponsored by Israel et al.) If the Middle East Quartet and its special envoy, or Zionist envoy to be more accurate, Tony Blair have managed to dissuade the Palestinian authority (PA) top politicians from proceeding with their bid for full UN membership as a sovereign state we would have been watching, apathetically, that is, the continuing Israeli hideous scheme to grab the last 22% of what used to be historic Arabic land of Palestine. [h=2]What good is the Palestinian bid for statehood?[/h][TABLE="class: tr-caption-container, width: 1"] [TR] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: tr-caption"]Abbas submitting the application for Palestinian full membership at the UN [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] The way I see it, this Palestinian bid for statehood is an inevitable outcome of decades of failed diplomacy (or make believe diplomacy), Arabic stupidity and Arabic economic and political divisions, obscene pro-Israel lobbying and duplicity made primarily in USA and unprecedented political and military thuggery of the state of Israel. This Palestinian bid for statehood is but a desperate cry after the so called Mid-East talks has hit the concrete wall of the illegal Israeli settlements that nobody seems to have the power to stop or freeze it for a while, not even the American honest peace broker. Some fastidious analysts and op-ed writers will go over this political maneuver, scrutinize it and finally assess it as not worth the effort, for it will not change realities on the grounds. This UN recognition will not put a stop to the Israeli illegal settlements in the west bank, will not grant them East of Jerusalem and moreover, might as well damage the PA mandate and political authority. But those scrupulous analysts most likely looked at this maneuver from an Israeli point of view, repeating the Israeli cliché unilateral action will not get the Israeli-Palestinian conflict anywhere disregarding the fact that this bid is not about the conflict, rather it is about the world acknowledging Palestine as a state, with all the legalities of the state entailed, and not just an entity. Being an entity is the next closest thing to being nothing. [h=2]The Arab awakening[/h]Those squeamish analysts somehow overlooked the current historical context in the Middle East where people are indiscriminately killed and their lives sacrificed not over some looming recession or spiking unemployment, not over the lack of bread and butter but rather the lack of freedom and dignity. And who could be lacking those attributes more than a homeless and uprooted Palestinian. This bid is the Palestinian ticket to join the last days of the Arab spring that has turned into a hot summer and with the undergoing display of the dirtiest diplomatic stunts pulled by the American/Israeli alliance and with their blatant contempt for UN values and unanimity the expected American veto will herald one of the darkest autumns in the Arab world. The so called Arab spring is not just about mass protests and mass killing, it is not just about toppling Mubarak and Bin Ali in Egypt and Tunisia, it is not just about delegitimizing Saleh in Yemen and bombarding Gaddafi in Libya, it is not about watching the last days for Bashar Al-Assad in Syria and the prince of Bahrain, rather it is about the Arab awakening. And if the world acknowledges that the Arabs are awakening, then, we simply cant exclude the Palestinians out. [h=2]A conflict dominated by unilateralism[/h][TABLE="class: tr-caption-container, width: 1"] [TR] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: tr-caption"]Theodor Herzl [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Eighteen years ago, on September 13, 1993, the Palestinian negotiators signed with the Israelis what is now known asthe Oslo accords, literally crumbs thrown to the Palestinians from the Israeli table of military spoils in Palestine, and those accords were not meant to be taken as a serious step in the peace process but rather a compulsory and temporary Israeli concession to somehow put an end to the first Palestinian intifada. According to these accords the Israeli side has cunningly bound the Palestinian side to a framework of bilateral negotiations as a precondition to any future settlement of the IsraeliPalestinian dispute. And from there on the Israeli side picked up where they left off and continued their business as usual of grabbing more land, building more settlements and transferring the rest of the Palestinian population unilaterally and unabashedly under the very nose of a coalition of the western nations who are only willing to go for a ten years hunt for the wrong terrorists. But when we look back at this so-called conflict we will be astounded by how unilateral this whole bloody business has been from the very beginning. - Theodor Herzl(1860-1904) when he first wrote his manifesto for a Jewish state and followed it with his utopian piece the old new land he naively and absolutely unilaterally assumed that the Arab land of Palestine, which he himself as an assimilated Ashkenazi Jew( who spoke neither fluent Hebrew nor Yiddish) has never visited, would be the perfect choice for the establishment of his Zionist entity and again unilaterally assumed that the Arabs of Palestine would present no problem for the Ashkenazi & khazar Jews mass immigration to the new land for they , as Europeans, would be welcomed and hailed by the Arabic inhabitants as the modernizers of Palestine. I dont know what Mr. Herzls idea of modernity was, but it is obviously not what the Arabs of Palestine needed back then and certainly not what they are enduring through nowadays. - Following the death of Herzl with his fictional idea of some utopian home land for the European Jews in Palestine a lot of decisions and acts, mostly criminal in nature, have been taken by the Israeli side starting from the Palestinian exodus 1948, passing through the military occupation of East Jerusalem, Gaza and west Bank in the 1967 Israeli offensive, to the segregation, the west bank wall, the war on Lebanon and Gaza, the non-stop uprooting of ancient Palestinian olive trees to be replaced by cemented settlements and finally the inhumane blockade on Gaza and the massacre of international activists in international waters all of those Israeli remarkable achievements have been deliberated upon, planned and executed unilaterally. And after 60 years of dispossession, 40 years of occupation and 20 years of make-believe peace, the Palestinian bid for UN membership is interestingly enough deemed a unilateral act of aggression and warfare against Israeli interests.Palestine was never invited to the table except in times of intifadas and more often in times of make-believe peace the end goal of both was obviously the same, namely buying more time to grab more land and expel more Palestinians and make new and hard to touch Israeli demographic changes . [h=2]The Zionist short cut[/h]But none of those Israeli illegal and aggressive goals would have been achieved so smoothly and with the minimum international opposition hadnt it been for the magical Zionist recipe of literally buying the top politicians, corporate media and decision makers in the west and of course the United States of America. In other words, buying politicians, specifically American, has been, and still is the Zionists short cut to establishing the great Israel project. Pandering to pro-Israel lobbies to garner more votes has been a shameful legacy kept by a long line of American top politicians and leaders initiated by Truman and his falling into the Rothschilds trap of securing his presidential triumph only if he voted for the establishment of the Jewish state of Israel. The latest in a long line of American Democrats and Republicans running for presidency to serve the Israeli goals rather than their countrys own, comes Texas Governor, Rick Perry standing lately shoulder-to-shoulder at a news conference with advocates for annexing West Bank settlements not to mention his prelude to the presidential campaign, dancing with far right-wing rabbis at his office a few months ago. While Barack Obama, the US president, in his brief speech at the UN has strongly confirmed in an intimidating voice tone that there is no short cut to the end of a conflict that has endured for decades between the Israelis and the Palestinians. And seriously added Peace is hard work He somehow has secured a short cut to his second term in office. Israels thuggish far-right foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told reporters shortly after Obamas speech that: I am ready to sign on this speech with both hands. But again, I think Mr. Obama has figured out this whole thing the wrong way. Pandering to Israel and sacrificing the interests and more importantly the pride of his country might grant him a second term in office, but is it worth it? is a second term in office worth that shameful submission? It doesnt make any sense I mean, the Zionists controlling Wall Street and the presidential elections is not a good enough reason for selling out America and its pride in that shamefull way. There is more to this than we all think, a hell of a lot more, something big is hiding under the surface like an iceberg, something as big as 9/11. The way Obama is handing over the keys of the white house to the Israelis while other heads of less-powerful states such as Erdogan of Turkey and Ahamdinejad of Iran stand tall in front of the Israeli political debauchery makes you wonder if 911, with the hidden truth about it, has turned into some Israeli wild card. Is acting against the very interests of the United States and abandoning the values of freedom, democracy and human rights, not to mention tarnishing his own legacy worth a second term in office. What a shame This Obama has missed out on a golden opportunity to not only earn his Nobel peace prize but to make history and glory for himself and the United States of America. The mere Abstinence from voting on the Palestinian bid for statehood, such a small step by Obamas administration, would have been a giant leap for him and the United States of America.