X-PASTER
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 12, 2007
- 11,610
- 1,810
By John R. MacArthur
June 17, 2009 "The Providence Journal"
-- It isn't quite fair to call Barack Obama a liar. During the campaign he carefully avoided committing to much of anything important that he might have to take back later. For now, I wont quibble with The St. Petersburg Timess Obamameter, which so far has the president keeping 30 promises and breaking only six.
And yet, broadly speaking, Obama has been lying on a pretty impressive scale. You just have to get past his grandiloquent rhetoric usually empty of substance to get a handle on it. I offer a short, incomplete list, which Im sure others could easily enlarge.
Yes, of course its nice to have a president who speaks in complete sentences. But that theyre coherent doesnt make them honest.
John R. MacArthur, publisher of Harper's Magazine.
June 17, 2009 "The Providence Journal"
-- It isn't quite fair to call Barack Obama a liar. During the campaign he carefully avoided committing to much of anything important that he might have to take back later. For now, I wont quibble with The St. Petersburg Timess Obamameter, which so far has the president keeping 30 promises and breaking only six.
And yet, broadly speaking, Obama has been lying on a pretty impressive scale. You just have to get past his grandiloquent rhetoric usually empty of substance to get a handle on it. I offer a short, incomplete list, which Im sure others could easily enlarge.
- Obama portrayed himself as the peace candidate, or at least the anti-war candidate. He is not a peace president, nor is he stopping any wars. True, he promised military escalation in Afghanistan (to blunt John McCains accusations of wimpishness), but well-meaning folks believed their new hero would genuinely move to end the occupation of Iraq and seriously try to negotiate with the Taliban. Instead, he has not only increased the number of troops and attacks against the Afghan insurgency, he has also expanded on George Bushs cross-border raids into Pakistan, which have killed many civilians. The way things are going, Pakistan could become the new Cambodia and Obama the new Nixon.
In Iraq, Obama has promised to withdraw all the troops . . . unless, which means that were not leaving. Whether its 50,000 troops remaining at the invitation of the so-called government of Iraq, or just enough to man the 14 permanent military bases, or some combination of U.S. military personnel and private mercenaries that exceeds 50,000 soldiers, our army will almost certainly stay in Iraq past the stated deadline of Jan. 1, 2012.
- Obama said he wanted to reform Washington and fix its broken system of corrupt lobbying. But Obama is neither a reformer nor a skilled legislative mechanic. Hatched from the Daley Machine in one-party Chicago, Obama wouldnt be president today if he rocked boats. Witness the appointment of Roland Burris by the corrupt former Gov. Rod Blagojevich to fill Obamas Senate seat: not a word of public protest from the new administration because Burris is a made man in the Chicago Democratic organization. So what if Tombstone Roland can be heard on the U.S. attorneys wiretaps of Blagojevich, dancing around the delicate question of how to raise money for Blago without appearing to be buying his seat.
As for pork-barrel politics, Obama named one of its greatest champions, Chicagos own Rahm Emanuel, as his chief of staff, and the new budget (as well as the stimulus package) is loaded with pork. Meanwhile, have you heard anything serious about campaign-finance reform from Obama? Not very likely from someone who refused public financing and still has about $10 million left over from record receipts of $745.7 million. Its just a detail, I know, but Obamas naming of former Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn III as deputy secretary of defense seems to be at odds with the presidents alleged crusade against special interests and the revolving door between private business and government. He has also sold ambassadorships to campaign donors. The biggest plum, London, is slated for Lou Susman, a Chicagoan and former Citigroup executive who bundled $239,000. Paris has been reserved for Charles Rivkin, who raised about $500,000 for Obama.
- Obama, with his Arabic middle name and his big Cairo speech, wants people to think that he is the Muslim worlds new best friend. Well, the photograph of a cheery Obama with Saudi King Abdullah and a smiling Emanuel with Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, proves the contrary. The Saudi royal family hates the idea of representative government for ordinary Muslims and is cruelly indifferent to the fate of the Palestinians. A democratic, independent, partly secular Palestine could only make the Saudi oligarchy look bad. Thus, the House of Saud is perfectly happy with the status quo, and so, evidently, is Obama.
Without Saudi pressure, there will be no resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, since Saudi oil is the only lever that would cause America to press Israel into making real concessions. Indeed, the president doesnt mean for one minute to force Israel into anything more than symbolic withdrawals of its illegal settlements on the West Bank. Meanwhile, the Saudi elite continues to play its double game, paying protection money to extremist Islam and granting pensions to the relatives of suicide bombers. Its just politics, say Barack and Rahm, grinning ear-to-ear with their sleazy new friends from Riyahd. Just keep the oil pumping around election time and all will be well.
- Obama makes like hes a friend of organized labor, at least he did during the Ohio primary when he needed to beat Hillary Clinton. At the time, he put out a flier headlined Only Barack Obama fought NAFTA and other bad trade deals and charged that a little more than a year ago, Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was a boon to the economy. In a debate with Clinton on Feb. 26, 2008, he said, I will make sure that we renegotiate [NAFTA] in the same way that Senator Clinton talked about and use the hammer of a potential opt-out as leverage to get labor and environmental standards that are enforced.
But two months ago, U.S. Trade Rep. Ron Kirk said such a blunt instrument was no longer necessary and that the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico were now of the mind that we should be looking for opportunities to strengthen [the North American Free Trade Agreement]. And, of course, there is no discussion at all about renegotiating Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, a bad trade deal that has done even greater harm to American workers and unions than has NAFTA.
Yes, of course its nice to have a president who speaks in complete sentences. But that theyre coherent doesnt make them honest.
John R. MacArthur, publisher of Harper's Magazine.
