Makanyaga
JF-Expert Member
- Sep 28, 2007
- 10,327
- 6,850
How do we know that Nyerere was the best thing? See the problem I have with folks who regard Nyerere highly is that we dont the alternatives, at his time, to make a logical, objective comparison. I am not even sure if we know Nyerere for who is or what he wanted Tanzanians to believe. He managed to create an aura of admiration and worship. He created an atmosphere where no one would question his ideas.
Remember the days when we couldnt read anything other than Uhuru, Mzalendo, Daily News and Sunday News before Mfanyakazi came into existence to provide some kind of an entertainment relief? You remember the days when the 8:00 PM RTD news bulletin would be followed up by a Ujumbe wa Leo propaganda? I have to give it up to Nyerere. He ensured that Tanzanians couldnt run or hide from his ideology. If you feed someone junk for twenty (20) years, they would believe that crap. He even went as far as insulting our intelligence by putting a hoe against himself in the election. A hoe or a hammer, can you believe that? Who elects a hoe as the president?
What ticks me off is the fact that he forced us to sing derogatory songs against Oscar Kambona. We sang this tune during our morning mchakamchaka routines in High School, Kambona ameolewa! Wapi?! Wapi?! Uingereza! Was Kambona really that bad? What is the historical truth?
When the TANU National Executive Committee met in Arusha January 26-29 1967 it turned out to be a stormy session. At this meeting Nyerere proposed that Ujamaa become the official policy of the government. Oscar Kambona objected strongly to this policy. Twice during these sessions, the Executive Committee adjourned in order to allow their three leaders, Nyerere, Kambona and Kawawa to go into private session. Each time that they returned to the Executive Committee it was apparent that Kawawa had supported Nyerere to defeat Kambona. The result was that the Arusha Declaration was adopted.
It gets me mad to realize that I actually sang derogatory songs against an individual who did nothing wrong. If at all, his crime was to express his opinion against Nyereres utopian dreams. The worst part is the fact that the introduction of free market economy has proven that Kambona was right and Nyerere's ideas were just a disaster in the making.
This artile is not whether Kambona was better than Nyerere, and vice versa. It is intended to push us into taking a very hard look at our history and what we have been long taught and gauge whether our perspective and perceptions are correct. But in order to effectively do that, we have to be objective and let go of our political biasness. Unfortunately, the Tanzanian history is tangled with Nyereres legacy.
In order for us to create the right future, we have to unearth some of the wrong foundations and beliefs that we have held on for so long. I dont want my children to grow up thinking that Nyerere was the best think that has ever happened to Tanzania, while that could not an objective assessment. I dont want my kids to grow up thinking that Oscar Kambona, Mzee Mapalala, or Kassanga Tumbo were villains simply because they didnt fit into Nyereres thinking. That is the point.
I strongly believe that we owe it to ourselves to query as to whether the little we know, particularly on Kambona's disagreement on Ujamaa, is enough to sideline this man and negatively portray his contribution the way Nyerere did.
Habari hii nilivyoisoma mimi kwa tafsiri yangu inaonyesha mambo mengi sana, baadhi tu machache tu yakiwa kama ifuatavyo:
1. Inaonyesha KAMA Kambona hakuwa muwazi sana kwa wenzake, alikuwa anajaribu kuwa-double cross. Akiwa nao anawakubalia, halafu akifika mbele ya hadhira ya kamati husika, anaamua kuwageuka
2. Alikuwa jasiri na kwamba alikuwa tayari kwa lolote
3. Mgomo wa wanaJeshi yeye akiwa kama Waziri wa Ulinzi, lazima alikuwa na taarifa za awali, ambazo alimficha Mwalimu. Huwezi ukawa waziri wa Ulinzi halafu jeshi liko mbioni kugoma, halafu wewe ukawa huna taarifa, ni uongo na haiwezekani.
4. Kitendo cha kuwatuliza wanajeshi kinaonyesha moja kwa moja kuwa anaweza kuwa alikuwa anahusika ila aliamua kutumia saikolojia ya the obvious will not be taken as the truth, the obvious will not seem the obvious!
5. Kilichokuja kuwafanya watofautiane na Mwalimu ni huo mgomo wa wanajeshi, mwalimu atakuwa alipata taarifa kamili baadaye, baada ya mgomo huo.
6. Kuhusu issue ya vijiji vya Ujamaa, Kambona hakuwa sahihi kwa sababu huwezi ukafanya Pilot Study kwa "ku-experiment na maisha HALISI ya watu", ungekuwa ni upumbavu wa hali ya juu sana. Actualy mimi naweza kusema kitu cha namna hii ni blasphemy kwa maisha ya mwanadamu na hivyo, kwa Mungu pia. Ndiyo maana madaktari wanaojifunza upasuaji huwa wanatumia vyura na panya na si Binadamu mzima, na sijui lakini ila nadhani wanapofikia hatua ya juu, pengine huwa wanatumia sanamu za binadamu ( a model of a human being), na pengine maiti, kwa kibali maalumu cha mamlaka husika ya Nchi
7. Mimi nimezaliwa na kukulia kijijini, kabla ya vijiji vya ujamaa kuanzishwa, na hivyo nayajua maisha kabla ya vijiji vya ujamaa. Watu walivyokuwa wanaishi maporini, mapori zaidi ya wanavyoishi sasa hivi wamasai huko Ngrongoro. Huu ndiyo ukweli kwa sababu kipindi hicho walikuwa aroud million 8 tu. It was a terrible kind of living ambayo haikuhitaji mtu msomi yeyote kuhitaji Pilot Study kwa ajili ya kuwanasua watu kutoka kwenye maisha ya namna hiyo, ASSUMING PILOT STUDY INGEKUWA A VIABLE WAY OF DOING IT!
8. Kambona inaonyesha kama alikuwa hayajui kabisa hata chembe, maisha ya watu waliokuwa wanaishi maisha ya kijijini kabla ya vijiji vya ujamaa, ambayo mwalimu alikuwa anataka awanasue
9.Kambona alikuwa anafanya insurbodination, kitendo cha kuwakatalia wenzake mbele ya hadhira ya kamati husika. Angekuwa na nia njema wangeweza kuwa wanazi-resolve differences zao huko halafu wanakuja kwenye kamati wakiwa na kitu kimoja. Na hii kitu ndiyo inanifanya nizidi kuamini kuwa taarifa za mgomo alikuwa anazijua
10. Kambona alikuwa sahihi kwenye jambo moja tu, la mfumo wa vyama vingi, ila inaonyesha KAMA, makubaliano yao huko nyuma kabla ya army MUTINY, ilikuwa ni kwamba wataendesha mfumo wa vyama vingi. Baada ya Jeshi kugoma, KAWAWA na Nyerere wakawa wameamua kuchukua msimamo tofauti, kwa sababu waligundua kuwa yeye alikuwa na maslahi yake binafsi, wakaamua kumziba. Kwa hiyo in a way, yeye ndiyo alisababisha mfumo wa vyama vingi usiwepo.
Ni mengi sana naweza kuchambua kutoka kwenye habari hii, sema tu muda hautoshi. Kambona mimi sikuwahi kumfahamu, zaidi ya kumuimba kwenye nyimbo za mchaka mchaka.
Mimi ushauri wangu siku zote naomba watu tuwe tunakuwa wakweli kutoka ROHONI, na ikiwezekana kabisa, pasiwepo na tofauti kati ya maneno yetu na dhamira tulizonazo rohoni. Siyo mtu unasimamia advocacy ya ukweli na uwazi halafu rohoni una kitu kingine tofauti kabisa na yale ambayo huwa unatamka siku zote.Ukifanya hivi, watu siyo wajinga watakuona tu halafu utashindwa hata namna ya kujitetea, utabaki kuandika kwenye magazeti!
Naomba niwe mkweli kabisa kutoka rohoni kwangu kwamba kwa kiasi fulani huyu mtu ameniumixza sana!