Roulette
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 15, 2010
- 5,579
- 5,375
EMT, read again what you wrote before coming to this conclusion:Wakati mwingine huyu jamaa huwa anatoa remarks which are "inconveniently" true. Mwaka 2008 alisema mkuu mpya wa intelligence could leak information to Iran. Turkey summoned the Israel ambassador for questioning.
Just mwezi uliopita aliulizwa if he were Iranian he would want a nuclear weapon, akasema ndiyo because Iran are not doing it just for Israel but because the world is full of nuclear weapons from Indian, Pakistan, Korea to Russua.
Wakati wa vita ya Libya alisema kuwa kama Gaddafi were allowed to turn nuclear, no one (Berlusconi or Sarkozy nor Cameron) would have dare to order the recent events. Mwaka 1999 alisema kuwa if he was a stateless young Palestinian, angejiunga na kundi la ugaidi.
On the other hand, kuna tatizo kubwa la Tanzania kutoheshimika au hata kutotambulika duniani. Sina maana ya kujustify alichosema Barack but Tanzania on the global arena haipo.
Can you see, from Mr. Barak's statements how people are wrong or right, black or white, clean or dirty, powerful or powerless based on the discourse? Mr. Barak is right: Ikiwa utamwambia mpalestine ajieleze kuhusu his struggle he will tell you what he thinks na utamwelewa. the same applies to any militant who knows who he is, and what he stands for.
If Tanzania is seen as an unimportant country leo, kuna vitu vingi vya kujiuliza:
- Is it because Tanzania IS weak?
- Is it because the dominant discourse of power and weakness PORTRAYS Tanzania as a weak country? (I think so)
There was a time when we had an ideology. was it a good or a bad one? I don't think it is relevant to this topic.
However, what was good about having an ideology was the fact that most of Tanzanian carried their citizenship with pride and the world ended up respecting it. When you asked leaders, and the elite class, what they thought about Tanzania as a country, they actualy had a common understanding. they had a set of values, cultural identity, ideology, goal, vision that they could present to the world... and that discourse was repeated over and over... it ended up convincing not only Tanzanian but the rest of the world too.
Kumbuka what was said in the Consul letter: Tanzanian are peaceful people, and Tanzania is a naturaly diverse country. Now, is it not something Tanzanian could claim to have that Israeli don't have? If we decided that peace and war with neighbors, minimal security threats against the nation etc were the ultimate units of measuring the effectiveness of a government, would Israel be able to compete?
We are PERCEIVED as weak because we have allowed other countries to look at us through their criterion, and worse, we are looking at ourselves through other people's criterion. We don't know how we want to be seen... we don't have an image to defend.
Nimeona in this thread, and in other thread about the same topic, some Tanzanians, here in this forum, agreeing with Mr. Barak. Not that they agree that he has the right to express his opinion about Tanzania, but agreeing that Tanzania was nothing!
That is the sign that the discourse has penetrated us, kuliko tunavo fikiria. Some of us have accepted to be what other people want us to be.
Na uchungu sasa hivi nikuona maybe this reality has affected our leaders too, na ndio maana wanashindwa kutoa tamko.