Mahakama ya Uhujumu Uchumi: Mvutano mkali kesi ya Mbowe na wenzake. Hatma ya kesi kujulikana Septemba 6

[Crimea]

Kwa hyo anawaza Kama unawazavyo wewe?

Hapana

 

[Crimea]

wiki ijayo nikijaaliwa afya njema , nitaweka hadharani namba za akaunti mnazoingiziwa hela ndogo tsh elfu 7 kila wiki

Nmecheka kwa dharau!

 

[bagamoyo]

mtumishi mmoja wa serikali alisimamishwa kazi 'kwa masilahi ya taifa' na akashtaki akiiomba mahakama kumrejesha kazini. Jaji Mwalusanya aliuliza upande wa mashtaka ueleze maana ya kumwachisha mtumishi wa umma kwa masilahi ya taifa, akiuliza hayo 'masilahi ya taifa' maana yake ni nini? Upande wa mashtaka haukuwa na 'definition' ya masilahi ya taifa na pamoja na mambo mengine, Jaji Mwalusanya alielekeza huyo mtumishi arejeshwe kazini na alipwe stahiki zake zote tangu aliposimamishwa kazi.

Shukrani kwa kutoa citation nzuri ya rejea, matumaini ni kuwa mheshimiwa Jaji atatumia hekima na kuubali hoja nzito za upande wa utetezi. Hii imtafanya Jaji Luvanda naye kuingia katika kukumbuku za majaji walioweka precedent ya kutukuka kama Jaji Mwalusanya.

Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge’s personal views. Read More : Precedent

 

[Abul Aaliyah]

Hv ulikuwa ukiamin zle fix za mwendazake???

Ujinga wenu ni kufikri Mungu anatenda kwa wana chadema tu!

Magufuli aliposema tufunge na kuomba kwa ajili ya corona mlimkejeli mkasema Mungu ana kazi nyingi.

Mkibanwa ndio utaona mnajifanya walokole.

Sikia ndugu Mungu siyo Lisu wala Amsterdam, Mungu ni wa wote.

Huwa nashangaa mnakejeli eti Magu saa hii yuko motoni, yani nyie bavicha huwa mnafikiri Mungu anawaza kama muwazavyo nyie.

 

[The Palm Tree]

"lakini mawakili wa serikali wamekataa hivyo wao wanasema mkiwa na mawazo yanayofanana ni kikao tayari."

Mbowe ana mawazo yanayofanana na nani...?

Walijuaje kuwa wana mawazo ya kufanana? Wana kipimo cha kupimia mawazo ya kufanana...?

Kumbe hata sisi JF members humu tunaweza kuwa classified katika Makundi mawili au matatu kwa kigezo cha "kufanana kimawazo" na tukashitakiwa kwa ugaidi, au siyo wajameni...?

Duuh, nilikuwa sijui...

 

[secret file]

Hata mtu mwenye nusu akili kama wewe angetambua kesi za kuwa 'professional' au vinginevyo. Nashanga hiyo 'professional' yako sijui inahusu nini?

Ww panzi kabisa akili huna

 

[Lavit]

Mbowe ana mawazo yanayofanana na nani...?

Walijuaje kuwa wana mawazo ya kufanana? Wana kipimo cha kupimia mawazo ya kufanana...?

Jamaa wanachekesha sana.. sijui huwa wanatumia akili gani

 

[Halaiser]

Ujinga wenu ni kufikri Mungu anatenda kwa wana chadema tu!

Magufuli aliposema tufunge na kuomba kwa ajili ya corona mlimkejeli mkasema Mungu ana kazi nyingi.

Mkibanwa ndio utaona mnajifanya walokole.

Sikia ndugu Mungu siyo Lisu wala Amsterdam, Mungu ni wa wote.

Huwa nashangaa mnakejeli eti Magu saa hii yuko motoni, yani nyie bavicha huwa mnafikiri Mungu anawaza kama muwazavyo nyie.

Acha mipasho. Kama huna la maana ni bora usome comments za wengine kuna jambo utajifunza. Magufuli is gone. Hatorudi tena mwache alale zake. Atajuana na Mungu wake huko aliko.

 

[Halaiser]

Kesi ya Ugaidi inayomkabili Freeman Mbowe na wenzake watatu inaendelea kuunguruma kwenye Mahakama ya Uhujumu uchumi , Ambapo mvutano wa kisheria umekuwa mkali hasa baada ya Mapingamizi yaliyowekwa na Mawakili wa Mbowe kuwa ya moto .

1. Kiongozi, asante sana kwa kutushirikisha radha ya mnyukano huu mzuri wa kisheria.
2. Inashangaza kuona kwamba shtaka linadai washtakiwa walikula njama kutenda kosa la kigaidi na sehemu zikatajwa, lakini wanaoshtaki wanasema siyo lazima kuwe na kikao, bali 'common intention'. Hiyo 'common intention' inatoka wapi kama hakuna namna ya kuonyesha jinsi ilivyokuwa 'common intention'? Je, hizo njama zitawahusishaje watu wanne bila wao kuwa na namna ya kufanya kikao au at least kuwa connected kwenye mawasiliano fulani ambayo ndiyo yanayopanga kula hiyo njama?
3. Kama hakuna definition ya 'terrorist intentions' - yaani husemi maneno yanamaanisha nini - then utawezaje kusema kulikuwa na 'terrorist intetions'? Yaani kama hakuna maana ya kuwa nia ovu, utajuaje kuwa x ana nia ovu na utaanzia wapi? Ni kama kwenye kesi mojawapo miaka ya 1980 mtumishi mmoja wa serikali alisimamishwa kazi 'kwa masilahi ya taifa' na akashtaki akiiomba mahakama kumrejesha kazini. Jaji Mwalusanya aliuliza upande wa mashtaka ueleze maana ya kumwachisha mtumishi wa umma kwa masilahi ya taifa, akiuliza hayo 'masilahi ya taifa' maana yake ni nini? Upande wa mashtaka haukuwa na 'definition' ya masilahi ya taifa na pamoja na mambo mengine, Jaji Mwalusanya alielekeza huyo mtumishi arejeshwe kazini na alipwe stahiki zake zote tangu aliposimamishwa kazi.
4. Kitu kingine ambacho mawakili watetezi (sijui kama wamekitaja au la) ni upande wa mashtaka waweze kuonyesha tofauti kati ya an act of terrorism na an act of violence na whether ni tofauti au kitu kimoja. Vinginevyo utakuta hata kama watu wanabishana na mtu mwingine na kama kuna any act of violence wanaweza kuwa regarded kama wamefanya kitendo la kigaidi wakati siyo. Nadhani hii hoja ni vizuri wakaiweka vizuri ili jaji aweze kuiona vizuri na kuitolea uamuzi mzuri.

Mkuu shukrani sana tena sana kwa ufafanuzi wako. Wanye kutaka kujifunza wamepata points. Ubarikiwe sana Mkuu.

 

[The Palm Tree]

Ishu hapa Ni weledi na Independence of judge Luvanda. Otherwise, hii kitu iko wazi.

Kwa mfumo wa kisiasa na kiutawala Wa nchi yetu kwa sasa,inaweza kuwa ngumu sana kuitupilia mbali hii kesi katika hatua hii....

Nia na makusudi ya watesi wa Mbowe na CHADEMA, ni kumtesa tu na kumnyima uhuru wake for sometimes kama walivyojiapisha tangu awali...

Katika hatua hii, watu wanacheza na vifungu vya sheria tu. Jaji anayesikiliza shauri hili na watesi wa Mbowe ambao bila kumung'unya maneno ni CCM na serikali yao, lazima weekend hii watakuwa ktk kikao kizito kujadili ni kwa namna gani waindeleze dhamira yao ovu dhidi ya mtu huyu asiye na hatia kwa vipimo vyote hadi sasa...

Ni wazi kuwa mpaka sasa na ktk hatua hii, hati ya mashtaka ina makosa ya kisheria na kwa hiyo INAIBATILISHA KESI YOTE...

J'tatu Mbowe anaachiliwa (at least for simetimes) lakini atakamatwa na kufunguliwa mashtaka upya (obviously, la ugaidi litaondolewa na kugeuka (labda) kuwa jinai ya kawaida). Hii ni ili mradi tu shauri hili lifikie ngazi ya kusukilizwa kama kesi halisi na ili mradi tu ndg Freeman aendelee kukosa uhuru wake kwa muda wanaotaka wao...!

Na hii yote ni kwa sababu ya JUSTICE SYSTEM yetu kutokuwa strong & fair kutokana na mfumo wa utawala na kisiasa wa nchi yetu kuwa weak and unfair kwa kutengenezwa na kuzaliwa na katiba dhaifu/mbovu...

Kungekuwa na A VERY FIERCE & STRONG JUSTICE SYSTEM ambayo baadaye ungeilazimisha serikali kulipa fidia ya gharama kwa kumchafua mtu na kupoteza muda wa mtu kwa sababu ya hila za kisiasa tu, basi wasingefanya ujinga huu wafanyao sasa...!!

 

[The Wolf]

Hivi unawezaje kung'amua intentions za mtu kisheria...kuna mahali hawa watu wanafeli

 

[Omusolopogasi]

Subiri kwenye cross-examination ndio utafurahi kama jaji atafuata amri kutoka juu na kuendelea na kesi.

Mbowe ana mawazo yanayofanana na nani...?

Walijuaje kuwa wana mawazo ya kufanana? Wana kipimo cha kupimia mawazo ya kufanana...?

Kumbe hata sisi JF members humu tunaweza kuwa classified katika Makundi mawili au matatu kwa kigezo cha "kufanana kimawazo" na tukashitakiwa kwa ugaidi, au siyo wajameni...?

Duuh, nilikuwa sijui...

 

[ostrichegg]

Ujinga wenu ni kufikri Mungu anatenda kwa wana chadema tu!

Magufuli aliposema tufunge na kuomba kwa ajili ya corona mlimkejeli mkasema Mungu ana kazi nyingi.

Mkibanwa ndio utaona mnajifanya walokole.

Sikia ndugu Mungu siyo Lisu wala Amsterdam, Mungu ni wa wote.

Huwa nashangaa mnakejeli eti Magu saa hii yuko motoni, yani nyie bavicha huwa mnafikiri Mungu anawaza kama muwazavyo nyie.

Mungu hutenda HAKI.
Mungu ni wa wote lakini ukiomba ya kishetani hakusikilizi wala hakutimizii.

 

[KalamuTena]

Ww panzi kabisa akili huna

Nilijua tu utakuja hivyo!

 

[Bunyamboh]

Nalipwa na nani? Kwa ajili gani?

Siro: chadema wanamuona Mbowe malaika.

Bila CCM huwezi kuishi ,ndiyo maana unajitoa ufahamu kwa ajili ya CCM ,ndiyo maana unalaaniwa kwa sababu ya CCM ndiyo huna tofauti na balozi wa shetani kwa sababu ya CCM ndiyo maana uko tayari kwa lolote kwa sababu ya CCM

 

[Bunyamboh]

Nmecheka kwa dharau!

Huo ndo ukweli ,bila CCM huwezi kuishi.

 

[bagamoyo]

Kwa hiyo ndiyomaana mkaona mlete mashtaka mepesi ya kutunga mkajua upande wa utetezi utakua hauna mawakili wakuwa-challange nyie wabambika kesi?

Tutegemee mfumo wa jinai haki (criminal justice system) usiwe kama ule wa makaburu wa Afrika ya Kusini kabla ya ubaguzi kuisha, hapa Tanzania kuna ubaguzi na uonevu wa CCM dhidi ya waTanzania wengine mfano 'kukomoana' jinsi mashtaka dhidi ya Mbowe na wenzie walivyotayarishwa na mwenendo wa ofisi ya Mashtaka na mawakili wa serikali.

Lakini imani yetu ni kuwa mhimili wa Mahakama utatumia mzani wa haki ili kuondoa dhana ya kukomoana na haki kupatikana.


Historia ya mfumo jinai haki (criminal justice system) Alivyouona Nelson Mandela na wapinga ubaguzi wengine wasiojali rangi, walitiliia mashaka kama haki itatendeka :

HISTORIA YA AFRIKA YA KUSINI ENZI ZA UBAGUZI

Nelson Mandela International Day​

18 July​

Menu

© UN Photo/John Isaac

On Freedom​

"Black Man in a White Court"​

Nelson Mandela's First Court Statement - 1962​

• Extracts from the court record of the trial of Mandela held in the Old Synagogue court, Pretoria, from 15 October to 7 November 1962. Mandela was accused on two counts, that of inciting persons to strike illegally (during the 1961 stay-at-home) and that of leaving the country without a valid passport. He conducted his own defence.

MANDELA:
Your Worship, before I plead to the charge, there are one or two points I would like to raise.
Firstly, Your Worship will recall that this matter was postponed last Monday at my request until today, to enable Counsel to make the arrangements to be available here today. Although Counsel is now available, after consultation with him and my attorneys, I have elected to conduct my own defence. Some time during the progress of these proceedings, I hope to be able to indicate that this case is a trial of the aspirations of the African people, and because of that I thought it proper to conduct my own defence. Nevertheless, I have decided to retain the services of Counsel, who will be here throughout these proceedings, and I also would like my attorney to be available in the course of these proceedings as well, but subject to that I will conduct my own defence.
The second point I would like to raise is an application which is addressed to Your Worship. Now at the outset, I want to make it perfectly clear that the remarks I am going to make are not addressed to Your Worship in his personal capacity, nor are they intended to reflect upon the integrity of the court. I hold Your Worship in high esteem and I do not for one single moment doubt your sense of fairness and justice. I must also mention that nothing I am going to raise in this application is intended to reflect against the Prosecutor in his personal capacity.
The point I wish to raise in my argument is based not on personal considerations, but on important questions that go beyond the scope of this present trial. I might also mention that in the course of this application I am frequently going to refer to the white man and the white people. I want at once to make it clear that I am no racialist, and I detest racialism, because I regard it as a barbaric thing, whether it comes from a black man or from a white man. The terminology that I am going to employ will be compelled on me by the nature of the application I am making.
I want to apply for Your Worship's recusal from this case. I challenge the right of this court to hear my case on two grounds.
Firstly, I challenge it because I fear that I will not be given a fair and proper trial. Secondly, I consider myself neither legally nor morally bound to obey laws made by a parliament in which I have no representation.
In a political trial such as this one, which involves a clash of the aspirations of the African people and those of whites, the country's courts, as presently constituted, cannot be impartial and fair.
In such cases, whites are interested parties. To have a white judicial officer presiding, however high his esteem, and however strong his sense of fairness and justice, is to make whites judges in their own case.
It is improper and against the elementary principles of justice to entrust whites with cases involving the denial by them of basic human rights to the African people.
What sort of justice is this that enables the aggrieved to sit in judgement over those against whom they have laid a charge?
A judiciary controlled entirely by whites and enforcing laws enacted by a white parliament in which Africans have no representation - laws which in most cases are passed in the face of unanimous opposition from Africans -

---

MAGISTRATE:
I am wondering whether I shouldn't interfere with you at this stage, Mr Mandela. Aren't we going beyond the scope of the proceedings? After all is said and done, there is only one court today and that is the White Man's court. There is no other court. What purpose does it serve you to make an application when there is only one court, as you know yourself. What court do you wish to be tried by?

---

MANDELA:
Well, Your Worship, firstly I would like Your Worship to bear in mind that in a series of cases our courts have laid it down that the right of a litigant to ask for a recusal of a judicial officer is an extremely important right, which must be given full protection by the court, as long as that right is exercised honestly. Now I honestly have apprehensions, as I am going to demonstrate just now, that this unfair discrimination throughout my life has been responsible for very grave injustices, and I am going to contend that that race discrimination which outside this court has been responsible for all my troubles, I fear in this court is going to do me the same injustice. Now Your Worship may disagree with that, but Your Worship is perfectly entitled, in fact, obliged to listen to me and because of that I feel that Your Worship-

---

MAGISTRATE:
I would like to listen, but I would like you to give me the grounds for your application for me to recuse myself.

---

MANDELA:
Well, these are the grounds, I am developing them, sir. If Your Worship will give me time -

---

MAGISTRATE:
I don't wish to go out of the scope of the proceedings

happy to do so? READ MORE : Nelson Mandela's First Court Statement - 1962

Trials and prisons chronology – Nelson Mandela Foundation

Nelson Mandela was arrested on several occasions and stood trial four times. He spent over 27 years in prison. Our archivists and researchers have assembled dates and locations of transfers and time spent in confinement.

www.nelsonmandela.org

 

[Retired]

lazima weekend hii watakuwa ktk kikao kizito kujadili ni kwa namna gani waindeleze dhamira yao ovu dhidi ya mtu huyu asiye na hatia kwa vipimo vyote hadi sasa...

Exactly, nia ovu yao lazima waitimize, hawawezi kuacha hivi hivi, labda Samia wamwambie kuwa achana na hii kitu inakufedhehesha. Nani wa kumwambia hivyo?

 

[Retired]

'terrorist intentions' - yaani husemi maneno yanamaanisha nini - then utawezaje kusema kulikuwa na 'terrorist intetions'? Yaani kama hakuna maana ya kuwa nia ovu, utajuaje kuwa x ana nia ovu na utaanzia wapi?

Uko sahihi kabisa. Nadhani lazima kuwe na ingredients za terrorist intention halafu ndiyo utapta kuona kama ingredients hizo zimekuwa manifested katika shitaka hilo, short of that umefeli. Mshitakiwa hawezi ku mount defence kwa kitu ambacho hakiko defined in terms of its ingredients

 

[Naipendatz]

Acheni visingizio mnapwaya wote toka juu mpaka chini.
Humuwezi kudumu kwa kubumba na kubambika kesi.
DUNIA ishawashtukia ndio hamumuoni mwenzenu Bi Ushungi baada ya kuingizwa chaka, kaamua kuwa mhamashaji na dalali.

Kwa hizo siasa zenu za kizamani mtaendelea kulia lia kutaka huruma kila siku, yaani siasa mlizofanya miaka 15 iliyopita hadi leo mnazikomalia hizo hizo!! Hamuoni CCM kila siku wanabali namna yao ya siasa? Change guys, Mzee lowassa aliwashauri hilo mkamuona kavu