Legal documents na uchambuzi wa masuala ya kisheria hapa

Hello learned, Dragoon: or any other person in this useful forum, kindly avail soft copies of all Tanzania labour laws and it's rules/regulations, via my email mjunijackson@gmail.com or you share here, thanks in advance
You could go through the posts in these forum to get copies of your choice. Nevertheless, here are copies of the the same:
  • Employment & Labour Relations Act, No. 6/2004 –cap 366
  • Employment & Labour Relations Act, [RE 2009]
  • Labour Institutions Act, No. 7/2004 –cap 300
  • Employment and Labour Relations (Code of Good Practice) Rules, 2007, GN 42/2007.
  • The Labour Court Rules 2007
  • The Employment And Labour Relations (General) Regulations, 2017 GN 47/2017
  • The Employment and Labour Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2015.
  • The Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration Guidelines) Rules 2007, GN 67/2007.
  • The Labour Institutions (Ethics and Code of Conduct for Mediators and Arbitrators) Rules 2007, GN 66/2007.
  • The Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration) Rules 2007, GN 64/2007.
  • The Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No.2) Act, 2016. GN 21/2016 – Amends the Employment and Labour Relations Act and the Labour Institutions Act (part VII and XI respectively).
 

Attachments

  • Employment and Labour Cap 366 [RE 2009].pdf
    164.5 KB · Views: 83
  • Employment and Labour Relations Code of Good Practice Rules.pdf
    782.8 KB · Views: 509
  • GN 47 THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS (GENERAL) REGULATIONS, 2016.doc
    1.1 MB · Views: 126
  • Labour Court rules 2007 pdf.pdf
    9.8 MB · Views: 67
  • THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR LAWS (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS ) ACT, 2015.pdf
    266.1 KB · Views: 68
  • The Employment and Labour Relations Act, 6-2004.pdf
    469.6 KB · Views: 57
  • The Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration Guidelines) Rules 2007- GN 67 of 2007.pdf
    4.1 MB · Views: 70
  • The Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration) Rules 2007 -GN 64 of 2007.pdf
    4.1 MB · Views: 63
  • The Labour Institutions Act Chapter -300 [RE 2010].pdf
    89.6 KB · Views: 64
  • The Labour Institutions Act, 7-2004.pdf
    2.3 MB · Views: 55
  • Written Laws (Miscellanous Amendments) (No.2) 2016.pdf
    675.5 KB · Views: 101
Wakuu nnaweza pata kitabu cha investment law
vitabu vya Investment law vipo vingi mkuu. kwa vile huku-specify ni kitabu kipi hasa, sasa anza na hivi:
 

Attachments

  • Law and Practice of Investment Treaties.pdf
    360.3 KB · Views: 74
  • investments disputes.pdf
    348.3 KB · Views: 71
  • EU FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW.pdf
    3.9 MB · Views: 99
Thanks alot Mr. Dragoon for your tireless support n' help, your presence is so meaningful to this forum,, pia kama una regulations za legal Aid Act, 2018 pls avails to me!
 
Kuna hii kesi ya hivi karibuni. Ni kesi ya Farijala S. Hussen imeamuliwa na mahakama ya rufani mwishoni mwa mwezi uliopita. Inatoa angalizo kuhusu Notice of appeal na Memorandum of Appeal, pia namna ya kudraft notice of appeal. karibuni
 

Attachments

  • FARIJALA SHABAN HUSSEIN- cr app 274 of 2012.pdf
    5 MB · Views: 149
inaitwa Social Security Schemes (Totalization of Periods of Contributions) Guidelines, 2018, G.N. 396/2018 mkuu. hii hapa..
Dragoon kwanini case za labour zinaitwa REVISIONS? uNAPOTOKA cma UNAOMBA KUFANYA REVISION AND NOT APPEAL? Dragoon nimeona nililete huku tena unisaidie jibu. juhudi zote nimekwama from google
 
Dragoon kwanini case za labour zinaitwa REVISIONS? uNAPOTOKA cma UNAOMBA KUFANYA REVISION AND NOT APPEAL? Dragoon nimeona nililete huku tena unisaidie jibu. juhudi zote nimekwama from google
Let, me transfer your malice to put my gist here:-
(I say, I transfer your malice b'se the qn was in persona and not in rem)

GIST: This is because in CMA we have "Arbitration" as opposed to normal civil litigation (i.e plaint, petition, originating chamber summons, etc). And what is pronounced at the end of Arbitration is an "AWARD" and not a Judgment.

Therefore as the principle of "Arbitration" at global level is that an AWARD is not appeal. Now think in what condition does revision apply?? The answer is not far to seek, Revision even on our jurisdiction (see CPC, Cap 33 R.E 2002) lies where/in situation where there is no right of Appeal, e.g in objection proceedings etc.

In the final analysis since in CMA we pronounce "AWARD" and since an award is not appealable, Revision prevails/exists.

Now, let ask
What is the name of a "document" (i.e a pleading which initiate the cause of action/disputes in CMA? Is whether a plaint, petition, Application, etc or IS JUST A MERE FORM, which is F1? What is the name of that F1 in law suit?

========== Open to challenges ========
 
Let, me transfer your malice to put my gist here:-
(I say, I transfer your malice b'se the qn was in persona and not in rem)

GIST: This is because in CMA we have "Arbitration" as opposed to normal civil litigation (i.e plaint, petition, originating chamber summons, etc). And what is pronounced at the end of Arbitration is an "AWARD" and not a Judgment.

Therefore as the principle of "Arbitration" at global level is that an AWARD is not appeal. Now think in what condition does revision apply?? The answer is not far to seek, Revision even on our jurisdiction (see CPC, Cap 33 R.E 2002) lies where/in situation where there is no right of Appeal, e.g in objection proceedings etc.

In the final analysis since in CMA we pronounce "AWARD" and since an award is not appealable, Revision prevails/exists.

Now, let ask
What is the name of a "document" (i.e a pleading which initiate the cause of action/disputes in CMA? Is whether a plaint, petition, Application, etc or IS JUST A MERE FORM, which is F1? What is the name of that F1 in law suit?

========== Open to challenges ========
Makes a lot of sense! But why were labour disputes excluded from normal civil litigation? I am asking so because in labour disputes also there are RIGHTS , legal rights for that matter being contested. (by the way Malice?????) left in total confusion!
 
Wanasheria naomba kujua iwapo ni sahihi kwa mwanasheria wa halmashauri kuwatetea wananchi waliovamia kiwanja kilichopimwa na halmashauri yake na ambacho halmashauri imemmilikisha mtu kwa madai kuwa yalikuwa mashamba yao.Je alipaswa kuwa wakili wao kwa mujibu wa sheria ?
 
Wanasheria naomba kujua iwapo ni sahihi kwa mwanasheria wa halmashauri kuwatetea wananchi waliovamia kiwanja kilichopimwa na halmashauri yake na ambacho halmashauri imemmilikisha mtu kwa madai kuwa yalikuwa mashamba yao.Je alipaswa kuwa wakili wao kwa mujibu wa sheria ?
.
Mkuu, mwanasheria wa halmashauri atabaki kuwa wa halmmashauri tu hadi pale atakapokoma kuwa mwajiriwa. Kiuhalisia katika mgogoro wowote unaoihusisha halmashauri wanasheria wake ndio wanaotambulika kuwa wawakilishi rasmi.
Inapotokea mwanasheria wa halmashauri akatoa msimamo, utetezi au maoni katika mgogoro unaohusisha halmashauri, tena katika PROPER FORUM, hakika huo ni msimamo wa halmashauri.
Kwa mujibu wa taratibu zetu za kisheria, wakili (wa serikali au wa kujitegemea) haruhusiwi kutoa utetezi au usaidizi au huduma za kisheria kwa pande kinzani (upande wa pili wa mgogoro). Hii ni mahususi ili kuepuka conflict of interest.
 
.
Mkuu, mwanasheria wa halmashauri atabaki kuwa wa halmmashauri tu hadi pale atakapokoma kuwa mwajiriwa. Kiuhalisia katika mgogoro wowote unaoihusisha halmashauri wanasheria wake ndio wanaotambulika kuwa wawakilishi rasmi.
Inapotokea mwanasheria wa halmashauri akatoa msimamo, utetezi au maoni katika mgogoro unaohusisha halmashauri, tena katika PROPER FORUM, hakika huo ni msimamo wa halmashauri.
Kwa mujibu wa taratibu zetu za kisheria, wakili (wa serikali au wa kujitegemea) haruhusiwi kutoa utetezi au usaidizi au huduma za kisheria kwa pande kinzani (upande wa pili wa mgogoro). Hii ni mahususi ili kuepuka conflict of interest.
Nadhani sijaeleweka , halmashauri ilitwaa eneo ikalipa fidia ikapima viwanja ikamilikisha.Mwananchi kajitokeza kavamia kiwanja na kujenga kajumba kwa madai hajalipwa fidia yake kesi imeanzia baraza mvamizi akashindwa na kuamuliwa kubomoa kale kajumba, akakata rufaa mahakama kuu akashindwa. Akatafuta wakili ambaye ndio huyo Mwanasheria wa hiyo halmashauri iliyotwaa eneo swali je yule mwanasheria anapaswa asimame upande wa mwajiri wake au upande unaomdai mwajiri wake? Na kama yupo upande unaomdai mwajiri wake ambaye ni halmashauri yuko sasa?
 
Nadhani sijaeleweka , halmashauri ilitwaa eneo ikalipa fidia ikapima viwanja ikamilikisha.Mwananchi kajitokeza kavamia kiwanja na kujenga kajumba kwa madai hajalipwa fidia yake kesi imeanzia baraza mvamizi akashindwa na kuamuliwa kubomoa kale kajumba, akakata rufaa mahakama kuu akashindwa. Akatafuta wakili ambaye ndio huyo Mwanasheria wa hiyo halmashauri iliyotwaa eneo swali je yule mwanasheria anapaswa asimame upande wa mwajiri wake au upande unaomdai mwajiri wake? Na kama yupo upande unaomdai mwajiri wake ambaye ni halmashauri yuko sasa?
Ok. Huyo mvamizi kamtafuta huyo wakili kwa shabaha ipi? Anaweza kumtumia wakili wa halmashauri katika shauri jingine/mgogoro mwingine tofauti na mgogoro baina yake na halmashauri. Wakili anaweza kutumika kama shahidi, inakubalika. Hata hivyo ushahidi atakaoutoa wakili usihusiane na mgogoro baina ya mvamizi na halmashauri. ni kinyume cha maadili ya uwakili na uanasheria kwa ujumla.
kama anamtafuta wakili yule kwa manufaa ya kusalvage kesi yake dhidi ya manispaa, hakika haitowezekana. Hata wakili mwenyewe anafahamu ukweli kwamba hawezi kusimama upande wa pili. Hapa elewa kwamba hata kama mwanasheria huyu hakushiriki katika kesi baina ya halmashauri na mvamizi bado kimaadili haruhusiwi kusimama pande mbili tofauti katika shauri au mgogoro mmoja.
Pia zingatia kuwa mwajiriwa wa halmashauri ni mwajiriwa wa umma, na hawa waajiriwa wa umma hawana mamlaka ya kusimamia kesi za watu au makampuni binafsi katika mahakama au mabaraza hapa nchini.
 
Nadhani tunaelewa anachokifanya huyu mwanasheria anatumia kampuni yake ya uwakili na anasaini document kwa saini yake na mahakamani anahudhuria je hapo sheria inasemaje?
 
Back
Top Bottom