Kikwete angefanya hivi, Tanzania nayo itakuwa kama Zimbambwe? | JamiiForums | The Home of Great Thinkers

Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Kikwete angefanya hivi, Tanzania nayo itakuwa kama Zimbambwe?

Discussion in 'Jukwaa la Siasa' started by Janejo, Jul 2, 2008.

  1. J

    Janejo Member

    Jul 2, 2008
    Joined: May 26, 2008
    Messages: 79
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 13
    Hii imendikwa na mmoja wa academician toka Chuo Kikuu cha Dar es Salaam

    "To express my dilemma on Mugabe I will use a hypothetical scenario. Let us
    assume (as economists are known for) that President Kikwete decided to be
    tough and play hard ball on corruption and on matters of national economy
    and national pride. He starts by securing all sources of energy, and by
    borrowing a leaf from Putin, he locks in the Chief Executive Officer of
    IPTL for tax fraud, and demand that owners of IPTL sell the company to the
    government at a token price after obtaining evidence that the IPTL-TANESCO
    deal was influenced by corruption.

    Further, after obtaining convincing evidences that most of mining
    companies have been cheating on tax through over-invoicing capital imports
    and under-invoicing exports, Kikwete orders an arrest of all chief
    executive officers of the concerned mining companies, and place them in
    remand at Ukonga pending final investigation and prosecution. Most of the
    arrested officers are Canadians and Australians. Meanwhile, two marine
    officers from the UK are arrested for killing a prostitute at Silversand
    Beach Hotel, and the President insists that the Marines must be treated
    like any other suspect in the murder case, and thus must stay at Ukonga
    Prison pending investigation and prosecution. Tanzanian High Commissioner
    in London has been recalled home for talk after the government discovered
    that Her Majesty’s government knew all along that the Radar sold to
    Tanzania by the company owned by Her Majesty’s government was exorbitantly
    over-priced, and thus cheating poor Tanzania of her very scarce foreign
    currency. Meanwhile, an officer representative of the company that sold
    TPDF faulty helicopters that lead to death of members of TPDF has been
    arrested for fraud, and has been placed in Ukonga pending further
    investigation. The US government has strongly protested against this
    arrest, but President Kikwete refused to play ball, insisting that men in
    uniform have died and the law of the land must take its course regardless
    of the nationality of the suspect.

    Ok, enough of the fantasy. Our government would not do such things, even
    though European and American governments would not hesitate to take such
    actions themselves. A member of TPDF cannot kill a prostitute in London
    and get away with it. No way. And so on. But the Government of the United
    Republic of Tanzania cannot do what a self respecting government must do
    for the simple reason that the “international community” would not accept
    this. Hugo Chaves managed because he sits on a huge reserve of oil. Castro
    managed to do it because he does not allow free and fair election.

    Should our government try to play hardball, all foreign aid would be
    squeezed, all credit lines cut and the country would be demonized by the
    CNN, the BBC and, well, by the Security Council of the UN. All of a sudden
    the “international community” would remember that Karume did not win a
    fair election in Zanzibar. And that in 1995 election officers forgot to
    turn up at the polling stations in Dar es Salaam. They forgot to turn up
    in Zanzibar town in 2000 general election too. The “international
    community” would want Mahita to appear in the Hague for the death of 23
    people in Pemba. The EPA and RICHMOD sagas would be played time and again
    on the CNN and the BBC and the SKY and the El Jazeera and the SABC for the
    world to see how comical our leaders can get when trying not to prosecute
    looters of public funds, a comedy that would make Mobutu Sese Seso green
    with envy. You should not even be surprised that the “international
    community” would condemn Tanzania for interfering in the internal affairs
    of the Comoro, never mind that the government of Comoro invited Tanzania
    to interfere and the AU sanction the expedition. After all, when Mugabe
    sent troops to protect Kabila’s administration against the invasion of
    Uganda and Rwanda, it was Mugabe who was condemned by the “international
    community”, not the invaders! Mind you, Mugabe was acting under the SADC,
    and he was not even alone, Angola and Namibia were in Kinshasa too.

    So, should our President play hardball, the “international community”
    would see to it that our economy takes a huge nose dive, a free fall, with
    hyperinflation becoming the order of the day. The pay of professors would
    mean nothing, as you would then need a wheel-burrow full of money to
    simply buy a kilogram of sugar. Professor Lipumba and Mr. Mbowe would be
    invited to the Buckingham Palace and the White House and consultants would
    be offered to advice CHADEMA and CUF on how to unite so that they can
    unseat Kikwete. NGOs would be given plenty of money to undermine the
    government, just to teach us and everybody else a lesson that you never
    mess up with the big brothers.

    Come 2010 the “international community” would demand free and fair
    election in Tanzania. Most of us would be voting with our stomachs, too
    tired of hyperinflation to remember that we had pressed Kikwete to act
    against the mining companies and against corruption. We would be
    scrambling to help the West make a “regime change” democratically. The
    election would be declared free and fair only if Lipumba wins.

    Again, enough of the fantasy. As I said, this would never happen here. But
    it seems to me that it is happening in Zimbabwe. This is not to say that
    Mugabe is not stealing an election. Obasanjo too stole an election for
    Y’radua (do you remember how Obasanjo and his VP used to fight like mad
    cats? Oh, how would the “international community” have loved it had it
    been Mugabe and his VP were giving such a comedy). Kibaki, just next door,
    stole one too, and the “international community” told the victim of stolen
    election to negotiate with the one who stole it, and divide the “loot”. We
    know what Museveni is doing in Uganda, and that he survives on western
    handout in spite of all! The only reason that the “international
    community” is focusing on Mugabe is because he messed up with the big
    brothers. And he stole an election, of course. Why is it that Musharraff
    forced his way into Pakistani’s statehouse and he is still respected in
    the West? Do you remember how he interfered with the judicial system?

    My dilemma is, how can one condemn Mugabe without at the sametime greasing
    the Western machinations? And, are the people of Zimbabwe not free to even
    vote with their stomach? When we were fighting for Uhuru, Nyerere insisted
    that we want freedom, even of making our own mistakes. If Zimbabweans make
    a “mistake” of voting against Mugabe, forgetting that the economy would
    not have been in such a mess had it not been for the western embargo and
    sabotage who are we to tell Zimbabweans that vumilieni tuu, mbegu lazima
    ife kwanza kabla mti wa uhuru haujaota?

    Yet, I cannot bring myself to condemn Mugabe, even though I believe he
    stole this election. I made a mistake of celebrating Chiluba’s victory
    back then, thinking it heralded a new democratic dispensation in Africa.
    Later, I discovered that Chiluba was actually bankrolled by the Boers who
    wanted to undermine ANC in Lusaka.

    So, it is a dilemna. When I hear African leaders making statements about
    Mugabe, I do not know which part of the statememt was dictated from the
    Down Street No 10 and which part reflects our desire for a free and fair
    election. A desire for free and fair election can only be noble. But there
    is no nobility in becoming a pawn in other nations' games. I respect those
    who genuinely grieves the people of Zimbabwe and call for free and fair
    election. As for me, I am fed up with the Western machinations on the
    question of Mugabe, and I choose not to condemn him for stealing this
    election, and I am not proud of my stand either".
  2. Mahesabu

    Mahesabu JF-Expert Member

    Jul 2, 2008
    Joined: Jan 27, 2008
    Messages: 5,043
    Likes Received: 666
    Trophy Points: 280
  3. M

    Mafuchila JF-Expert Member

    Jul 2, 2008
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Messages: 752
    Likes Received: 22
    Trophy Points: 35
    Thanks a lot for a wonderful piece of reflection. Bravo brother.
  4. w

    wajinga Senior Member

    Jul 2, 2008
    Joined: Jun 25, 2008
    Messages: 148
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    The Freedom To Associate ,stay Alive And To Say No To Whomever One Wants Is Being Denied To The People Of Zim. Please Do Not Atribute Our Lack Of Good Governance To Western Countries. Its Actually The Imf That Hammered The Gvt To Come Clean On Epa.our Gtv Lacks Basic Policies To Make It Go Forward We Have Harvard, Camridged, Oxford, Stanford Educated Tanzanias Who Makes Uneducated Dissisions, Probably Delibarately To Rob The Nation And Do Not Blame The West For Our Larsonism.