Karume Jr vs Barclays Bank case | JamiiForums | The Home of Great Thinkers

Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Karume Jr vs Barclays Bank case

Discussion in 'Habari na Hoja mchanganyiko' started by BAK, Nov 28, 2008.

  1. BAK

    BAK JF-Expert Member

    Nov 28, 2008
    Joined: Feb 11, 2007
    Messages: 70,813
    Likes Received: 83,195
    Trophy Points: 280
    Karume’s son loses case against Barclays Bank

    Daily News; Thursday,November 27, 2008 @21:15

    The High Court has dismissed with costs the suit lodged by Amani Ali Karume, son of Tanzanian Ambassador to Germany, Mr Ali Amani Karume, demanding 16bn/- compensation from Barclays Bank Tanzania Limited, for wrongful dismissal and breach of employment contract.

    Judge Thomas Mihayo ruled that there was no evidence to prove the claims against the bank by Mr Karume, who was Deputy Managing Director. He ruled that there was no evidence to prove wrongful dismissal and claims of racial discrimination committed by the bank.

    On the evidence available, the judge ruled, Karume Junior resigned from the post he was holding within the bank on his own and, therefore, the letter of resignation was not vitiated by deceit, undue influence or threats. “There cannot be a dismissal where parties have exercised their rights under a contract within the terms of that contract. All in all, I find that the plaintiff (Karume) was not wrongfully and unfairly dismissed by the defendant (bank),” the judge ruled.

    In the case, Mr Karume, had claimed that the bank had employed him as Corporate Director with effect from September 2002, whereby in May 2003 he was duly promoted to the post of Deputy Managing Director. He charged, however, that for reasons best known to his employer, he continued to get same salary and other fringe benefits he received when he was a Corporate Director and was allegedly subjected to sinister racial discrimination.

    According to him, the defendant’s move of paying his junior better benefits than him amounted to blatant racial discrimination contrary to the policy of the bank provided for in Barclays Staff Handbook. The plaintiff stated that on November 6, 2003, he reluctantly tendered to the defendant a notice of resignation where upon receipt of the same, the bank proceeded to wrongfully dismiss him forthwith from his employment.

    In its defence, however, the bank through advocate Dilip Kesaria, denied the allegations by Mr Karume, saying that there was no any kind of discrimination extended to him at the time he was working with the international financial institution. Led by Mr Kesaria, the bank’s Managing Director, Mr Riskert Bade, told the court that Mr Karume was hired as a Corporate Director and was trained in Kenya, South Africa and United Kingdom, but he did not meet the expectations of his employer.
  2. Invisible

    Invisible Admin Staff Member

    Dec 9, 2008
    Joined: Feb 11, 2006
    Messages: 9,091
    Likes Received: 237
    Trophy Points: 160
    Karume junior demands 16bn/- from Barclays
    Daily News;
  3. Pundit

    Pundit JF-Expert Member

    Dec 9, 2008
    Joined: Feb 4, 2007
    Messages: 3,741
    Likes Received: 25
    Trophy Points: 135
    Even if Karume was wronged (which I suspect was not the case) this case was bound to be ruled on a political/ economic reasoning than justice.Tanzania simply cannot neither afford, nor can it muster the courage, to send an anti investment, even if just, vibe to the world.

    If you ask me none of the Karumes, with their overinflated sense of entitlement, has impressed me.

    Probably kaenda kufanya kazi na mizungu ikamuona bogus ikamtimua sasa analeta inda.