Globu
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 12, 2011
- 8,571
- 2,068
Kakojoe ukalale.
ISIS wamchoma akiwa hai rubani mateka wa Jordan
- Thread starter mjinga
- Start date
Kakojoe ukalale.
Ally Kombo
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 11, 2010
- 11,429
- 2,645
FaizaFoxy hata Mimi ninawasiwasi nae kama mahakama ya kadhi ikipita ndo atakua wakwanza kuchinja wenzake make yeye kilajambo linalofanywa nawasilamu hatakama alikubaliki kwake sawatusijui ni ansalisuna:what:
Makafiri unafiki hauwasaidii kitu ! yeye alikuwa Pilot wa ndege ya kivita na ISIS walipomtungua kwa makombora waliyopewa na wamarekani, yeye alikuwa akiwapiga makombora ya Biblia !
zajuza2000
Senior Member
- Feb 13, 2013
- 109
- 47
Unajua mm hawa jamaa nawashangaa sana. Cjui ata wanalalamika nn! Yeye alipokuwa akiwatupia makombora kule juu alikuwa akiona raha!! Sasa watu wamemtungua mulitaka wamfanyaje. Au wampe bibilia asome.
FaizaFoxy ni shetani
Last edited by a moderator:
Punjab Singh
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 14, 2014
- 955
- 650
Somoche
WEEKEND EDITION SEPTEMBER 19-21, 2014
The War on Terrorism is Terrorism
How the US Helped Create Al Qaeda and ISIS
by GARIKAI CHENGU
Much like Al Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS) is made-in-the-USA, an instrument of terror designed to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to counter Iran's growing influence in the region.
The fact that the United States has a long and torrid history of backing terrorist groups will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore history.
The CIA first aligned itself with extremist Islam during the Cold War era. Back then, America saw the world in rather simple terms: on one side, the Soviet Union and Third World nationalism, which America regarded as a Soviet tool; on the other side, Western nations and militant political Islam, which America considered an ally in the struggle against the Soviet Union.
The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, General William Odom recently remarked, "by any measure the U.S. has long used terrorism. In 1978-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the U.S. would be in violation."
During the 1970's the CIA used the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as a barrier, both to thwart Soviet expansion and prevent the spread of Marxist ideology among the Arab masses. The United States also openly supported Sarekat Islam against Sukarno in Indonesia, and supported the Jamaat-e-Islami terror group against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in Pakistan. Last but certainly not least, there is Al Qaeda.
Lest we forget, the CIA gave birth to Osama Bin Laden and breastfed his organization during the 1980's. Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, told the House of Commons that Al Qaeda was unquestionably a product of Western intelligence agencies. Mr. Cook explained that Al Qaeda, which literally means an abbreviation of "the database" in Arabic, was originally the computer database of the thousands of Islamist extremists, who were trained by the CIA and funded by the Saudis, in order to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan.
America's relationship with Al Qaeda has always been a love-hate affair. Depending on whether a particular Al Qaeda terrorist group in a given region furthers American interests or not, the U.S. State Department either funds or aggressively targets that terrorist group. Even as American foreign policy makers claim to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly foment it as a weapon of foreign policy.
The Islamic State is its latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly backfiring. ISIS recently rose to international prominence after its thugs began beheading American journalists. Now the terrorist group controls an area the size of the United Kingdom.
In order to understand why the Islamic State has grown and flourished so quickly, one has to take a look at the organization's American-backed roots. The 2003 American invasion and occupation of Iraq created the pre-conditions for radical Sunni groups, like ISIS, to take root. America, rather unwisely, destroyed Saddam Hussein's secular state machinery and replaced it with a predominantly Shiite administration. The U.S. occupation caused vast unemployment in Sunni areas, by rejecting socialism and closing down factories in the naive hope that the magical hand of the free market would create jobs. Under the new U.S.-backed Shiite regime, working class Sunni's lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. Unlike the white Afrikaners in South Africa, who were allowed to keep their wealth after regime change, upper class Sunni's were systematically dispossessed of their assets and lost their political influence. Rather than promoting religious integration and unity, American policy in Iraq exacerbated sectarian divisions and created a fertile breading ground for Sunni discontent, from which Al Qaeda in Iraq took root.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used to have a different name: Al Qaeda in Iraq. After 2010 the group rebranded and refocused its efforts on Syria.
There are essentially three wars being waged in Syria: one between the government and the rebels, another between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and yet another between America and Russia. It is this third, neo-Cold War battle that made U.S. foreign policy makers decide to take the risk of arming Islamist rebels in Syria, because Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is a key Russian ally. Rather embarrassingly, many of these Syrian rebels have now turned out to be ISIS thugs, who are openly brandishing American-made M16 Assault rifles.
America's Middle East policy revolves around oil and Israel. The invasion of Iraq has partially satisfied Washington's thirst for oil, but ongoing air strikes in Syria and economic sanctions on Iran have everything to do with Israel. The goal is to deprive Israel's neighboring enemies, Lebanon's Hezbollah and Palestine's Hamas, of crucial Syrian and Iranian support.
ISIS is not merely an instrument of terror used by America to topple the Syrian government; it is also used to put pressure on Iran.
The last time Iran invaded another nation was in 1738. Since independence in 1776, the U.S. has been engaged in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. Despite what the Western media's war cries would have you believe, Iran is clearly not the threat to regional security, Washington is. An Intelligence Report published in 2012, endorsed by all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, confirms that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Truth is, any Iranian nuclear ambition, real or imagined, is as a result of American hostility towards Iran, and not the other way around.
America is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented expansion of invasive domestic surveillance.
By rapidly increasing both government secrecy and surveillance, Mr. Obama's government is increasing its power to watch its citizens, while diminishing its citizens' power to watch their government. Terrorism is an excuse to justify mass surveillance, in preparation for mass revolt.
The so-called "War on Terror" should be seen for what it really is: a pretext for maintaining a dangerously oversized U.S. military. The two most powerful groups in the U.S. foreign policy establishment are the Israel lobby, which directs U.S. Middle East policy, and the Military-Industrial-Complex, which profits from the former group's actions. Since George W. Bush declared the "War on Terror" in October 2001, it has cost the American taxpayer approximately 6.6 trillion dollars and thousands of fallen sons and daughters; but, the wars have also raked in billions of dollars for Washington's military elite.
In fact, more than seventy American companies and individuals have won up to $27 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last three years, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity. According to the study, nearly 75 per cent of these private companies had employees or board members, who either served in, or had close ties to, the executive branch of the Republican and Democratic administrations, members of Congress, or the highest levels of the military.
In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defense report stated, "the data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist attacks against the U.S." Truth is, the only way America can win the "War On Terror" is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.
Garikai Chengu is a research scholar at Harvard University. Contact him on garikai.chengu@gmail.com
Who ever wants to challenge this research should contact the person on this email address above.
WEEKEND EDITION SEPTEMBER 19-21, 2014
The War on Terrorism is Terrorism
How the US Helped Create Al Qaeda and ISIS
by GARIKAI CHENGU
Much like Al Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS) is made-in-the-USA, an instrument of terror designed to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to counter Iran's growing influence in the region.
The fact that the United States has a long and torrid history of backing terrorist groups will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore history.
The CIA first aligned itself with extremist Islam during the Cold War era. Back then, America saw the world in rather simple terms: on one side, the Soviet Union and Third World nationalism, which America regarded as a Soviet tool; on the other side, Western nations and militant political Islam, which America considered an ally in the struggle against the Soviet Union.
The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, General William Odom recently remarked, "by any measure the U.S. has long used terrorism. In 1978-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the U.S. would be in violation."
During the 1970's the CIA used the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as a barrier, both to thwart Soviet expansion and prevent the spread of Marxist ideology among the Arab masses. The United States also openly supported Sarekat Islam against Sukarno in Indonesia, and supported the Jamaat-e-Islami terror group against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in Pakistan. Last but certainly not least, there is Al Qaeda.
Lest we forget, the CIA gave birth to Osama Bin Laden and breastfed his organization during the 1980's. Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, told the House of Commons that Al Qaeda was unquestionably a product of Western intelligence agencies. Mr. Cook explained that Al Qaeda, which literally means an abbreviation of "the database" in Arabic, was originally the computer database of the thousands of Islamist extremists, who were trained by the CIA and funded by the Saudis, in order to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan.
America's relationship with Al Qaeda has always been a love-hate affair. Depending on whether a particular Al Qaeda terrorist group in a given region furthers American interests or not, the U.S. State Department either funds or aggressively targets that terrorist group. Even as American foreign policy makers claim to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly foment it as a weapon of foreign policy.
The Islamic State is its latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly backfiring. ISIS recently rose to international prominence after its thugs began beheading American journalists. Now the terrorist group controls an area the size of the United Kingdom.
In order to understand why the Islamic State has grown and flourished so quickly, one has to take a look at the organization's American-backed roots. The 2003 American invasion and occupation of Iraq created the pre-conditions for radical Sunni groups, like ISIS, to take root. America, rather unwisely, destroyed Saddam Hussein's secular state machinery and replaced it with a predominantly Shiite administration. The U.S. occupation caused vast unemployment in Sunni areas, by rejecting socialism and closing down factories in the naive hope that the magical hand of the free market would create jobs. Under the new U.S.-backed Shiite regime, working class Sunni's lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. Unlike the white Afrikaners in South Africa, who were allowed to keep their wealth after regime change, upper class Sunni's were systematically dispossessed of their assets and lost their political influence. Rather than promoting religious integration and unity, American policy in Iraq exacerbated sectarian divisions and created a fertile breading ground for Sunni discontent, from which Al Qaeda in Iraq took root.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used to have a different name: Al Qaeda in Iraq. After 2010 the group rebranded and refocused its efforts on Syria.
There are essentially three wars being waged in Syria: one between the government and the rebels, another between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and yet another between America and Russia. It is this third, neo-Cold War battle that made U.S. foreign policy makers decide to take the risk of arming Islamist rebels in Syria, because Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is a key Russian ally. Rather embarrassingly, many of these Syrian rebels have now turned out to be ISIS thugs, who are openly brandishing American-made M16 Assault rifles.
America's Middle East policy revolves around oil and Israel. The invasion of Iraq has partially satisfied Washington's thirst for oil, but ongoing air strikes in Syria and economic sanctions on Iran have everything to do with Israel. The goal is to deprive Israel's neighboring enemies, Lebanon's Hezbollah and Palestine's Hamas, of crucial Syrian and Iranian support.
ISIS is not merely an instrument of terror used by America to topple the Syrian government; it is also used to put pressure on Iran.
The last time Iran invaded another nation was in 1738. Since independence in 1776, the U.S. has been engaged in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. Despite what the Western media's war cries would have you believe, Iran is clearly not the threat to regional security, Washington is. An Intelligence Report published in 2012, endorsed by all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, confirms that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Truth is, any Iranian nuclear ambition, real or imagined, is as a result of American hostility towards Iran, and not the other way around.
America is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented expansion of invasive domestic surveillance.
By rapidly increasing both government secrecy and surveillance, Mr. Obama's government is increasing its power to watch its citizens, while diminishing its citizens' power to watch their government. Terrorism is an excuse to justify mass surveillance, in preparation for mass revolt.
The so-called "War on Terror" should be seen for what it really is: a pretext for maintaining a dangerously oversized U.S. military. The two most powerful groups in the U.S. foreign policy establishment are the Israel lobby, which directs U.S. Middle East policy, and the Military-Industrial-Complex, which profits from the former group's actions. Since George W. Bush declared the "War on Terror" in October 2001, it has cost the American taxpayer approximately 6.6 trillion dollars and thousands of fallen sons and daughters; but, the wars have also raked in billions of dollars for Washington's military elite.
In fact, more than seventy American companies and individuals have won up to $27 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last three years, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity. According to the study, nearly 75 per cent of these private companies had employees or board members, who either served in, or had close ties to, the executive branch of the Republican and Democratic administrations, members of Congress, or the highest levels of the military.
In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defense report stated, "the data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist attacks against the U.S." Truth is, the only way America can win the "War On Terror" is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.
Garikai Chengu is a research scholar at Harvard University. Contact him on garikai.chengu@gmail.com
Who ever wants to challenge this research should contact the person on this email address above.
Last edited by a moderator:
FaizaFoxy
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2011
- 92,881
- 109,191
Qur'an 2:
15. Mwenyezi Mungu atawadhihaki wao na atawawacha katika upotofu wao wakitangatanga ovyo. ***
16. Hao ndio walio nunua upotofu kwa uwongofu; lakini biashara yao haikupata tija, wala hawakuwa wenye kuongoka. ***
17. Mfano wao ni kama mfano wa aliye koka moto, na ulipo tanda mwangaza wake kote kote Mwenyezi Mungu aliiondoa nuru yao na akawawacha katika giza, hawaoni. ***
18. Viziwi, mabubu, vipofu; kwa hivyo hawatarejea. ***
Hornet
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 29, 2013
- 26,117
- 49,474
naomba kuiona Hiyo video tafadhali
Black Sniper
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 10, 2013
- 28,461
- 45,750
Punjab Singh
Brother we know the truth, na mwenye uelewa ataelewa na anaejitoa ufahamu atabaki hivyo hivyo nasema hivyo kwa sababu nimeona vijana wakidanganywa London na kupelekwa somalia na Syria kwenda kujilipua huwezi amini wanaowachukuwa ni wayahudi waliosoma na kuongea kiarabu wakivaa kanzu ndefu na ndevu nyingi lakini huwaoni misikitini I have seen this shit happened
Brother we know the truth, na mwenye uelewa ataelewa na anaejitoa ufahamu atabaki hivyo hivyo nasema hivyo kwa sababu nimeona vijana wakidanganywa London na kupelekwa somalia na Syria kwenda kujilipua huwezi amini wanaowachukuwa ni wayahudi waliosoma na kuongea kiarabu wakivaa kanzu ndefu na ndevu nyingi lakini huwaoni misikitini I have seen this shit happened
Last edited by a moderator:
Punjab Singh
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 14, 2014
- 955
- 650
Nsiande
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 27, 2009
- 1,649
- 872
He was extremely brave he was praying through it all he met his death with dignity and died a matry (sp ) Jordan have a right to avenge his barbaric death anyone siding with Isis in the name of Islam should simply go and join them I wish we could sprinkle ebola on these male jokers and barbaric jihadist who kills to gain some orgasmic attention and capture faithful Muslim women and turn them into sex slaves they are simply sex starved coward jokers at times like this I wish hell would rain on them
Punjab Singh
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 14, 2014
- 955
- 650
They are not Muslims, Period!
Nina huzuni na majonzi.Sijui niliangalia video kwa nini ,kuona binadamu anateketea namna hii iliniuma mnooo.yaani tumbo la uzazi linauma.Mungu ampe special treatment ampumzishe kwa Amani .nimefiwa na ndugu na marafiki .ila hiii imeniogopesha
DIUNATION
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 2, 2012
- 2,586
- 1,709
Mwanadamu amekua ni zaidi ya mnyama.
haa mym
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 7, 2014
- 4,823
- 4,557
Wewe unamatatizo sio bure umeangalia video ya yeye wakati anatupa mabomu chini unajua ameua wangapi wasio na hatia? Acha unafki mungu ampumzishe kwa amani kwa lipi jema kuua watu kwa mabomu ivi ujui kama yeye alikua vitani na kama ni vita alivyokamatwa ulitaka wampe kitanda godoro na mke?
Tokyo40
JF-Expert Member
- Jun 16, 2013
- 2,065
- 1,924
Drones za Marekani zinaua raia wasio na hatia kila siku.
The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama reached its fifth anniversary on Thursday having tallied up an estimated death toll of at least 2,400 people.
As the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a U.K.-based non-profit, details on its website, five years ago the CIA conducted the first drone strikes of the Obama presidency. Although there were reports of suspected "militants" killed, at least 14 civilians also died that day.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued a pair of reports in October fiercely criticizing the secrecy that shrouds the administration's drone program, and calling for investigations into the deaths of drone victims with no apparent connection to terrorism. In Pakistan alone, TBIJ estimates, between 416 and 951 civilians, including 168 to 200 children, have been killed.
Spurce: huffpost.com
Theguardian.com
The U.S. drone program under President Barack Obama reached its fifth anniversary on Thursday having tallied up an estimated death toll of at least 2,400 people.
As the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a U.K.-based non-profit, details on its website, five years ago the CIA conducted the first drone strikes of the Obama presidency. Although there were reports of suspected "militants" killed, at least 14 civilians also died that day.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued a pair of reports in October fiercely criticizing the secrecy that shrouds the administration's drone program, and calling for investigations into the deaths of drone victims with no apparent connection to terrorism. In Pakistan alone, TBIJ estimates, between 416 and 951 civilians, including 168 to 200 children, have been killed.
Spurce: huffpost.com
Theguardian.com
Janjaweed
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 20, 2010
- 13,157
- 10,655
Hii list imeandaliwa na nani??
Similar Discussions
-
-
Rubani msaliti apigwa risasi akiwa mafichoni Uhispania- Started by green rajab
- Replies: 56
-
Kamala Harris aumizwa na mateso ya Wapalestina. Mwanamfalme wa Saudia na Jordan wapo kimya kabisa- Started by Webabu
- Replies: 98
-
Hamas original waanza kujitokeza Jordan yasema Hospital iliyoshambuliwa na Israel ni ya jeshi lao
- Started by Shotocan
- Replies: 0
-
Waziri Mkuu wa Ireland, Leo Varadkar atangaza kujiuzulu- Started by 2 of Amerikaz most wanted
- Replies: 28