Barbarosa
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 16, 2015
- 22,584
- 27,811
Ukisoma hiyo Habari yote utaona ya kwamba hatujajifunza sana kutoka kwenye Madini yetu, kwa maana hapa kwenye Gesi yetu tutapata asilima 7.7 (7.5%) kama mrabaha kumbuka kwenye madini tunapata 3% hivyo ni mara mbili yake tu na kibaya zaidi kiko hapa kwamba Makampuni yatalazimishwa kuchangia kama yakipata faida ya uuzwaji wa Gesi yetu!
Sasa hapa ndipo mchezo utakapochezwa kwa maana tutalipwa tu kama kuna ushahidi haya makampuni yatapata faida na haya makampuni yana uzoefu mkubwa sana na hizi sheria wana watalaamu wa kutosha kuweza kudanganya na kutuambia kwamba hawapati faida na watafanya hivyo kwa miaka hata 20 na uthibitisho hawatakosa kama kurudisha gharama za uwekezaji hata hii ya kudai kusomesha Watz Ulaya watasema imewagharimu kwenye kuweza kupata faida!
Hivyo naishauri Serikali yetu chini ya Raisi Magufuli na Wazriri Muhogo huu ni wizi kama tu wizi wa kwenye madini na miaka 50 ijayo tutakuwa kama tulivyo leo hii kwenye madini hakuna chochote ch kuonyesha kilichotokana na gesi yetu, hivyo ni bora tuache tuwekeze kwenye ujuzi kwanza ili hapo baadaye TPDC yetu iweze kufanya haya yote hata kama ni kwa low scale klk kwenda hivi!
Market Conditions Will Limit Tanzania's Natural Gas Sector
Tanzania finally passed a petroleum bill July 5 regulating the country's growing hydrocarbon sector, the first major bill of its kind since Tanzania's emergence as a potential source of significant natural gas production. The petroleum law establishes several key parameters for new investment in the sector, including prioritizing natural gas production for the country's domestic market where it can be used to support the city of Dar es Salaam's manufacturing and industrial potential.
The law is part of Tanzania's attempts to cement its place as one of the Indian Ocean Basin's next major natural gas exporters. Reaching this goal will be challenging, however, given that others — including Australia, Mozambique, Canada and the United States — are pursuing the same goal on a similar time frame. These competitors will prove more appealing to investors, limiting the expansion of the Tanzanian natural gas sector, at least in the next decade. But even small natural gas export growth could have a tremendous impact on Tanzania.
Analysis
East Africa has seen a string of successful hydrocarbon discoveries over the past decade. Along with Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Mozambique and Madagascar have had varying degrees of success in the development of, and production from, hydrocarbons. While this success will significantly impact the respective East African countries' domestic economies, Tanzania and Mozambique will have the greatest impact on global natural gas markets.
Tanzania has been producing small amounts of natural gas since mid-2004, when the Songo Songo natural gas field came online. Its first major deep-water discovery occurred in 2010-2011, when the British companies BG Group and Ophir drilled three successful wells. Statoil, ExxonMobil and others have also seen successes since then, which have pushed the region's natural gas reserves to an estimated 1.6 trillion cubic meters, a figure that is still rising.
International oil companies are considering major investments in deep-water production facilities and eventually natural gas liquefaction plants, where overall investments would likely exceed $20 billion to $30 billion. At a minimum, the corporations are exploring options to build a two-train liquefied natural gas facility that could be in operation by 2020 with the potential for expansion in the event of additional natural gas discoveries. (An LNG train is the plant's liquefaction and purification facility.)
Regulatory Changes
In light of these discoveries, Tanzania began reassessing its regulations and laws regarding the sector, though up until now it had not accomplished much in the way of regulatory changes. Meanwhile, to encourage exploration, Tanzania accepted bids for its fourth licensing round in May 2014. No licenses were ever issued, however, because the energy ministry has been mired in a scandal that led to the energy minister's resignation in January and an overhaul of the Cabinet. Moreover, the government wanted to wait for the passage of the petroleum bill, which gives it more power to regulate the sector and more revenue from projects. In fact, Tanzania might even cancel the round to take advantage of the new petroleum bill.
A Conversation with Tanzanian President Jakaya KikweteFree
Under the new legislation, proposed deep-water offshore blocks would have a 7.5 percent royalty, the share of profit on natural gas would exceed 60 percent, and companies would be forced to satisfy Tanzania's domestic natural gas market — and support any potential natural gas-fueled manufacturing industry — before exporting natural gas. In a move to offset this hit to the international oil companies, Tanzania has also extended the initial development contract length from 20 years to 25 years in recognition of the long investment horizon for LNG options.
Even with these regulatory changes to fiscal and contractual terms, Tanzania remains an attractive investment destination. Details must still be worked out, such as what compensation will be paid for natural gas prioritized for the domestic market and how to divide domestic obligations between oil and natural gas companies operating under different contractual models. But the main challenge for Tanzania and companies operating there are emerging market conditions. When Tanzania was first considered a potential deep-water oil and natural gas producer back in the mid-2000s, natural gas supplies were much tighter. One decade later, the supply picture has changed, of course.
Australia is now massively expanding its LNG export capacity, with seven facilities coming online between 2014 and 2017, bringing 84 billion cubic meters of annual export capacity. Already, companies investing in Australia's LNG export business, including BG Group, have seen their fortunes reverse and are struggling to find long-term contract options for their remaining uncontracted capacity. Meanwhile, the United States has approved eight projects to export LNG to countries regardless of whether they have a free trade agreement with the United States. One of these projects, Cheniere's Sabine Pass LNG facility, is expected to begin exports later this year; it has six trains planned.
In Africa, Tanzania's development lags behind that of Mozambique, which will likely have its own LNG facilities come online first. Mozambique has had more discoveries than Tanzania, with U.S. oil and gas exploration firm Anadarko's Area 1 block alone having more than 2.1 trillion cubic meters of natural gas and Eni's Area 4 block almost as much. Eni is proposing to have its Coral floating LNG project enter service by 2019, and Anadarko has already awarded contracts to a consortium led by Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. for an onshore LNG facility that would also come online in 2019. Both Anadarko and Eni are looking to make final investment decisions by the end of 2015.
Race Against Time
Tanzania's biggest challenge is a race against time. The sheer amount of LNG capacity coming online over the next decade could overwhelm the market. Tanzania has gained relatively little investment thus far and must compete for space with projects that are already entering production (Australia) or are close to making that leap (the United States and Mozambique). Tanzania's struggles to quickly pass the bill and the uncertainty surrounding the law, the energy ministry and the upcoming national elections have delayed potential investments and decision-making, allowing its competitors to move even further ahead.
Most damaging to its ability to compete, Tanzania might have the highest development costs of all of the countries looking to export significant volumes of LNG. LNG facilities in North America are a mixture of completely new facilities and existing LNG import facilities modified to liquefy and export natural gas. The United States already has a well-developed and well-maintained natural gas pipeline system that those facilities can tap into and feed their plants, so facility construction and modification expenses represent the extent of the capital costs the companies will be investing in. Tanzania, by contrast, has almost no existing infrastructure to tap into and does not have a domestic service industry to help support its development. Everything will need to be brought in, adding to the costs of development in Tanzania (as well as Mozambique).
Expectations regarding the pace of Tanzania's natural gas development should therefore be tempered. With China continuing to expand its own domestic production through shale gas exploration and its pipeline commitments from Russia, an impending oversupply of LNG hitting the market is a near certainty — at least for the next five years — making oil companies hesitant to jump into Tanzania as long as more attractive and competitive options exist. Lower energy prices forcing companies to cut capital expenditure budgets are another factor. When the market readjusts in five to 10 years, however, Tanzania will begin to look more appealing. In the meantime, oil companies will continue to explore and appraise the country, inevitably making new discoveries for small-scale export.
Market Conditions Will Limit Tanzania's Natural Gas Sector
Sasa hapa ndipo mchezo utakapochezwa kwa maana tutalipwa tu kama kuna ushahidi haya makampuni yatapata faida na haya makampuni yana uzoefu mkubwa sana na hizi sheria wana watalaamu wa kutosha kuweza kudanganya na kutuambia kwamba hawapati faida na watafanya hivyo kwa miaka hata 20 na uthibitisho hawatakosa kama kurudisha gharama za uwekezaji hata hii ya kudai kusomesha Watz Ulaya watasema imewagharimu kwenye kuweza kupata faida!
Hivyo naishauri Serikali yetu chini ya Raisi Magufuli na Wazriri Muhogo huu ni wizi kama tu wizi wa kwenye madini na miaka 50 ijayo tutakuwa kama tulivyo leo hii kwenye madini hakuna chochote ch kuonyesha kilichotokana na gesi yetu, hivyo ni bora tuache tuwekeze kwenye ujuzi kwanza ili hapo baadaye TPDC yetu iweze kufanya haya yote hata kama ni kwa low scale klk kwenda hivi!
Market Conditions Will Limit Tanzania's Natural Gas Sector
Tanzania finally passed a petroleum bill July 5 regulating the country's growing hydrocarbon sector, the first major bill of its kind since Tanzania's emergence as a potential source of significant natural gas production. The petroleum law establishes several key parameters for new investment in the sector, including prioritizing natural gas production for the country's domestic market where it can be used to support the city of Dar es Salaam's manufacturing and industrial potential.
The law is part of Tanzania's attempts to cement its place as one of the Indian Ocean Basin's next major natural gas exporters. Reaching this goal will be challenging, however, given that others — including Australia, Mozambique, Canada and the United States — are pursuing the same goal on a similar time frame. These competitors will prove more appealing to investors, limiting the expansion of the Tanzanian natural gas sector, at least in the next decade. But even small natural gas export growth could have a tremendous impact on Tanzania.
Analysis
East Africa has seen a string of successful hydrocarbon discoveries over the past decade. Along with Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Mozambique and Madagascar have had varying degrees of success in the development of, and production from, hydrocarbons. While this success will significantly impact the respective East African countries' domestic economies, Tanzania and Mozambique will have the greatest impact on global natural gas markets.
Tanzania has been producing small amounts of natural gas since mid-2004, when the Songo Songo natural gas field came online. Its first major deep-water discovery occurred in 2010-2011, when the British companies BG Group and Ophir drilled three successful wells. Statoil, ExxonMobil and others have also seen successes since then, which have pushed the region's natural gas reserves to an estimated 1.6 trillion cubic meters, a figure that is still rising.
International oil companies are considering major investments in deep-water production facilities and eventually natural gas liquefaction plants, where overall investments would likely exceed $20 billion to $30 billion. At a minimum, the corporations are exploring options to build a two-train liquefied natural gas facility that could be in operation by 2020 with the potential for expansion in the event of additional natural gas discoveries. (An LNG train is the plant's liquefaction and purification facility.)
Regulatory Changes
In light of these discoveries, Tanzania began reassessing its regulations and laws regarding the sector, though up until now it had not accomplished much in the way of regulatory changes. Meanwhile, to encourage exploration, Tanzania accepted bids for its fourth licensing round in May 2014. No licenses were ever issued, however, because the energy ministry has been mired in a scandal that led to the energy minister's resignation in January and an overhaul of the Cabinet. Moreover, the government wanted to wait for the passage of the petroleum bill, which gives it more power to regulate the sector and more revenue from projects. In fact, Tanzania might even cancel the round to take advantage of the new petroleum bill.
A Conversation with Tanzanian President Jakaya KikweteFree
Under the new legislation, proposed deep-water offshore blocks would have a 7.5 percent royalty, the share of profit on natural gas would exceed 60 percent, and companies would be forced to satisfy Tanzania's domestic natural gas market — and support any potential natural gas-fueled manufacturing industry — before exporting natural gas. In a move to offset this hit to the international oil companies, Tanzania has also extended the initial development contract length from 20 years to 25 years in recognition of the long investment horizon for LNG options.
Even with these regulatory changes to fiscal and contractual terms, Tanzania remains an attractive investment destination. Details must still be worked out, such as what compensation will be paid for natural gas prioritized for the domestic market and how to divide domestic obligations between oil and natural gas companies operating under different contractual models. But the main challenge for Tanzania and companies operating there are emerging market conditions. When Tanzania was first considered a potential deep-water oil and natural gas producer back in the mid-2000s, natural gas supplies were much tighter. One decade later, the supply picture has changed, of course.
Australia is now massively expanding its LNG export capacity, with seven facilities coming online between 2014 and 2017, bringing 84 billion cubic meters of annual export capacity. Already, companies investing in Australia's LNG export business, including BG Group, have seen their fortunes reverse and are struggling to find long-term contract options for their remaining uncontracted capacity. Meanwhile, the United States has approved eight projects to export LNG to countries regardless of whether they have a free trade agreement with the United States. One of these projects, Cheniere's Sabine Pass LNG facility, is expected to begin exports later this year; it has six trains planned.
In Africa, Tanzania's development lags behind that of Mozambique, which will likely have its own LNG facilities come online first. Mozambique has had more discoveries than Tanzania, with U.S. oil and gas exploration firm Anadarko's Area 1 block alone having more than 2.1 trillion cubic meters of natural gas and Eni's Area 4 block almost as much. Eni is proposing to have its Coral floating LNG project enter service by 2019, and Anadarko has already awarded contracts to a consortium led by Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. for an onshore LNG facility that would also come online in 2019. Both Anadarko and Eni are looking to make final investment decisions by the end of 2015.
Race Against Time
Tanzania's biggest challenge is a race against time. The sheer amount of LNG capacity coming online over the next decade could overwhelm the market. Tanzania has gained relatively little investment thus far and must compete for space with projects that are already entering production (Australia) or are close to making that leap (the United States and Mozambique). Tanzania's struggles to quickly pass the bill and the uncertainty surrounding the law, the energy ministry and the upcoming national elections have delayed potential investments and decision-making, allowing its competitors to move even further ahead.
Most damaging to its ability to compete, Tanzania might have the highest development costs of all of the countries looking to export significant volumes of LNG. LNG facilities in North America are a mixture of completely new facilities and existing LNG import facilities modified to liquefy and export natural gas. The United States already has a well-developed and well-maintained natural gas pipeline system that those facilities can tap into and feed their plants, so facility construction and modification expenses represent the extent of the capital costs the companies will be investing in. Tanzania, by contrast, has almost no existing infrastructure to tap into and does not have a domestic service industry to help support its development. Everything will need to be brought in, adding to the costs of development in Tanzania (as well as Mozambique).
Expectations regarding the pace of Tanzania's natural gas development should therefore be tempered. With China continuing to expand its own domestic production through shale gas exploration and its pipeline commitments from Russia, an impending oversupply of LNG hitting the market is a near certainty — at least for the next five years — making oil companies hesitant to jump into Tanzania as long as more attractive and competitive options exist. Lower energy prices forcing companies to cut capital expenditure budgets are another factor. When the market readjusts in five to 10 years, however, Tanzania will begin to look more appealing. In the meantime, oil companies will continue to explore and appraise the country, inevitably making new discoveries for small-scale export.
Market Conditions Will Limit Tanzania's Natural Gas Sector