Did china and WHO doom the word with covid19 for China to sign a trade deal with America

Kevin85ify

JF-Expert Member
Apr 6, 2019
2,685
3,429
Information has been leaked that china knew of the covid19 outbreak in late November 2019. The doctors who blew the whistle were immediately arrested and detained with two of them dying in custody from covid19.

December 15nth 2019, China signed a trade deal with America with a very interesting clause "By an act of God, if anything like a pandemic breaks out the conditions in the trade deal will not hold".

It seems china knew for 6 weeks about the virus but delayed to control it and deliberately let it spread across the world.
December 30th 2019, Taiwan informs the WHO about the virus and the human to human transmission capability of the virus. The WHO ignores Taiwan to avoid angering China which claims Taiwan to be it's territory.

Despite being close to China, Taiwan imposed lockdown measures and demanded all citizens to wear masks in public and carried out mass testing campaign and aggressive contact tracing. WHO by this time still insisted Human to human infection is not proved and flights from china should not be stopped giving an edge to the virus. The WHO at this time still refused to call this a pandemic.

Earlier that month, Taiwan accused the WHO of ignoring it when the government asked about person-to-person transmission at the very start of the outbreak in China, which it said put lives at risk.

The island has been praised for its swift and decisive handling of its epidemic, which has been relatively controlled and has seen few deaths.

The measures included drastically cutting inbound flights from China and imposing quarantines on travellers early on, which experts say was key in stopping the spread in the community, as well as strict surveillance measures on those in quarantine.

Apr 3, 2020 , WHO is yet to accept warning from Taiwan and still claims the virus can be transmitted by air because China is yet to confirm the same despite a warning from Taiwan on the same.

"The WHO didn't take the information provided by Taiwan seriously, and we believe that led to the delayed global response to the COVID19 pandemic," the CECC said in a written statement to DW.

Taiwan is a highly sensitive issue for Beijing and counts as one of China's "core national interests," said Geddes.

"The WHO and its Director-General Tedros Adhanom must be all too aware that angering China over Taiwan could potentially put an end to their cooperation with Beijing. The WHO's ignoring Taiwan and treating it as if it were a Chinese province appears to be a direct consequence of these fears."


Budget pressures

Another area of contention is the perception of China's growing influence over the institution.

Since its founding in 1948, money to the WHO has flown in two streams: assessments and voluntary contributions. Each member state is required to pay a certain amount to be part of the organization; this is called an "assessed contribution," and the amount depends on a country's population and economic development.

Voluntary contributions are donations from governments as well as partners such as charities and trusts, and the funding is usually earmarked for particular projects.

China's WHO contributions have grown in recent years, rising by 52% since 2014 to approximately $86 million.
While this jump is largely due to China's increase in assessed contributions, Beijing has also slightly increased voluntary contributions from $8.7 million in 2014 to approximately $10.2 million in 2019.

Still, it pales in comparison to the United States which is by far the organization's largest donor. In 2018-19, Washington's total contribution to the WHO was $893 million. The US' donations make up about 14.6% of all voluntary contributions given globally.

The next member country with the biggest contributions is the UK, which paid $434.8 million in dues and donations during that period, followed by Germany and Japan.
 
If investigations prove that china knew and just let the virus spread, the world should hold china and the WHO to account for the misery they have allowed to affect the world. Now we have over 100,000 people dead and trillions of dollars wiped out of the world economy.
Australia, european union, israel and america are all pointing to this direction. That china and WHO knew about the virus and they let it spread across the world to benefit China.
 
If investigations prove that china knew and just let the virus spread, the world should hold china and the WHO to account for the misery they have allowed to affect the world. Now we have over 100,000 people dead and trillions of dollars wiped out of the world economy.
Australia, european union, israel and america are all pointing to this direction. That china and WHO knew about the virus and they let it spread across the world to benefit China.
There is nothing the world can do to China. China is too big and too important for the world to fight it. China manufactures almost all the antibiotics and other important drugs used in the USA. Most of the PPE (personal protective equipments) to fight corona are coming from China. Most ventilators are coming from China.

Iphones are manufactured in China. Even Samsung phones are manufactured in China. If you mess up China with their cheap, highly skilled labour and low manufacturing costs, where will iphones be made from? USA? I don't think so. The labour cost in the US is too high for manufacturing of most products.

Personally, i don't like the Chinese because of their racism against black people but we have to admit one fact, the world fully depends on China for almost everything. Every country should build their own industrial base first before trying to destroy China, otherwise tutaanza hata kukosa toothpick kwa meza na tissue paper. Tutaanza kutumia gazeti chooni if we don't build our own industries.
 
Blaming Chinese won't help much, should also be remembered that when China was hit initially, they proceeded to put into lockdown the Wuhan city which was epicenter of the pandemic, this allowed them time to prepare the rest of the country, and world should have taken note then and prepared ourselves.

Leaders like Trump instead of listening to their experts, chose to ridicule China, even here in Africa, we didn't do much, still allowed planes full of Chinese nationals to offload them in their thousands, and some even continued operations when alarm was raised everywhere, there are countries that are still operating normally to-date, damning stubborn.

Brazil chose to ignore expert advice, they are currently taking a serious beating. Here in Africa, we are somehow lucky this Corona thing seems to be lenient on us inexplicably.
 
There is nothing the world can do to China. China is too big and too important for the world to fight it. China manufactures almost all the antibiotics and other important drugs used in the USA. Most of the PPE (personal protective equipments) to fight corona are coming from China. Most ventilators are coming from China. Iphones are manufactured in China. Even Samsung phones are manufactured in China.

If you mess up China with their cheap, highly skilled labour and low manufacturing costs, where will iphones be made from? USA? I don't think so. The labour cost in the US is too high for manufacturing of most products. Personally, i don't like the Chinese because of their racism against black people but we have to admit one fact, the world fully depends on China for almost everything. Every country should build their own industrial base first before trying to destroy China, otherwise tutaanza hata kukosa toothpick kwa meza na tissue paper. Tutaanza kutumia gazeti chooni if we don't build our own industries.
the consequeces of the pandemic will be terrible for china,the centralisation of global supply chains in china will be the first to take a dive,the pandemic has just revealed the soft underbelly of outsourcing manufacturing in cheap labour intensive countries,especially of critical supplies such as phamarciticals,one of the greatest hindrance of international trade and a global village is insecurities of dependency
 
Back
Top Bottom