The key aspects of his arguments was that , by revoking acacia ownership or their properties including "makanikie" the Government would be in breach of the So cold "Miga" and as the result of it the Government is going to face the consequences for doing so, but so far nothing like that had happen against the Government other than the acacia to succumbed to a hostile take over . So at the end of the day acacia has been the loserNow you're talking... can you highlight that untruth thing from my thread?!