Game Theory
Platinum Member
- Sep 5, 2006
- 8,545
- 835
Zimbabwe government refused to compensate white farmers, all the money for compensation was being given by Britain. While that was done Mugabe was misdirecting the funds to his own use and hence Britain refused to finance that programme any more.
There wasn't any invasion of farms by Zimbabweans; it was only a political tool for support. Mugabe was losing ground and hence compensated the freedom fighters using a lot of money which as the country couldn't afford, and this was done in the 90's.
DUA
Once again you are wrong, about two year ago I had to do a research for a project which focused on the land crisis in Subsaharan Africa and i had two case studies: KENYA and ZIMBABWE.
What i came to conclude was that the issue in Zimbabwe is very straight forward, but confused by the white media and white sponsored internal opposition such as MDC.
Look,the issue of land transfer was at the heart of the Lancaster House Treaty in 1982 ,but in order for its smooth transition required subsequent British Governments to honoured the clear agreements they made. Part of this agreement, required Britain to provide financial renumeration to the Mugabe government to pay back white Zimbabweans; who of course inflated the cost of the land which they got for next to nothing.
People who blame Mugabe, I suggest no little about what has taken place, and in effect is a distraction and part of the enemy strategy. What progressive African leader has not face this.The mistakes which Mugabe has made, or has been purported to have made are marginal, as what leaders do not excerice poor judgement even when not African leaders opearting in such contexts. The greatest people cannot see the future and make honourable but poor judgement on many occassions.