Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Why should bunge not allow 55 yrs stand as a criteria 4terminal benefits? Read

Discussion in 'Jukwaa la Siasa' started by Mmbande, Jul 30, 2012.

  1. M

    Mmbande Member

    Jul 30, 2012
    Joined: May 7, 2012
    Messages: 8
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    Are the law makers knowing if every person cut from employment deserves?
    The law demanding one out of employment to claim for his terminal benefits till 55 years of age gives a chance for those with authorities to exercise INJUSTICE to their subordinates.

    Many are expelled from employment because of the events behind the scenes stated into papers. Thus the one affected/expelled because of misunderstanding behind the scene to wait until 55 years is deadly because;

    1. He or She might die before 55,
    2. She or He may get no other job to death thus he got to wait till 55,
    ... 3. She or He may use the claimed money from Security Funds to invest and start a new life
    4. She or He got no job that he wont pay for kids' fee if any,
    5. She or He can not have money to run a family

    The security funds organizations claim to have a full blessing from Workers Unions, to my opinion these unions never understood the purpose of this move.

    Just by looking at the matter using the COMMON EYE the law is pro SECURITY FUNDS ORGS. and not WORKERS who make these funds flourish. This law has to be overturned to favor workers! Hope MPS understand this to avoid humiliations to employees.
  2. O

    Ochutz JF-Expert Member

    Jul 30, 2012
    Joined: May 21, 2011
    Messages: 466
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 33
    very true...
  3. Sangarara

    Sangarara JF-Expert Member

    Jul 30, 2012
    Joined: Sep 29, 2011
    Messages: 12,634
    Likes Received: 34
    Trophy Points: 145
    Its appears there is very big Job insecurity in this country.