Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

The Piltdown Man Fraud

Discussion in 'Jukwaa la Elimu (Education Forum)' started by X-PASTER, May 3, 2010.

  1. X-PASTER

    X-PASTER Moderator

    #1
    May 3, 2010
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Messages: 11,651
    Likes Received: 75
    Trophy Points: 145
    The Piltdown Man Fraud

    In 1912, Charles Dawson, a famous doctor and also an amateur paleontologist, claimed to have discovered a jawbone and part of a skull in a gravel pit near the village of Piltdown in England. Although the jawbone resembled that of an ape, the teeth and skull resembled those of human beings. These specimens were given the name of Piltdown Man, an age of 500,000 was estimated for them, and they were exhibited in various museums as incontrovertible proof of evolution. For some 40 years, they were the subject of many scientific papers, analyses and reconstructions. Some 500 academics from various universities all over the world prepared doctoral theses on the subject of Piltdown Man.(1)

    On a visit to the British Museum in 1935, the famous American paleoanthropologist H.F. Osborn proclaimed Piltdown "a discovery of transcendent importance to the prehistory of man,"and added, "We have to be reminded over and over again that nature is full of paradoxes …" (2)

    In 1949, Kenneth Oakley of the British Museum's Paleoanthropology Department sought permission to perform a new dating technique, the fluoride test, on some old fossils. When it was carried out on the Piltdown Man fossil, it was revealed that the jawbone contained no fluoride. This showed that it had been underground for no more than a few years. The skull contained a low level of fluoride, making it only a few thousand years old.

    Subsequent chronological investigations based on the fluoride method confirmed that the skull was only a few thousand years old. It was also realized that the teeth
    had been artificially abraded, and that the primitive artifacts found alongside the fossils were mere reproductions, made with modern steel implements. (3)

    With the detailed analyses performed by Weiner, this fraud was definitively revealed in 1953. The skull was 500 years old and human, and the jaw belonged to a newly dead orangutan! The teeth had been added later, and their joints abraded to give the impression they were human. Later, all the parts had been stained with potassium dichromate to give them an aged appearance. When the bones were placed in acid, the stains disappeared.

    Le Gros Clark, a member of the team that uncovered the fraud, was unable to mask his astonishment: "the evidences of artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye. Indeed so obvious did they seem it may well be asked-- how was it that they had escaped notice before?
    "(4)

    Piltdown Man, which had been exhibited for the previous 40 years or so, was then hurriedly removed from the British Museum.

    1. Malcolm Muggeridge, The End of Christendom, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980, p. 59.
    2. Stephen Jay Gould, "Piltdown Revisited," Natural History, March 1979, p. 98.
    3. Kenneth Oakley, William Le Gros Clark & J. S, "Piltdown," Meydan Larousse, Vol. 10, p. 133.
    4. Stephen Jay Gould, "Smith Woodward's Folly," New Scientist, p. 444.
     
  2. PakaJimmy

    PakaJimmy JF-Expert Member

    #2
    May 3, 2010
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Messages: 16,234
    Likes Received: 101
    Trophy Points: 145
    Ni ubishi wa wazungu tu, had it been Bongoland, the discovery would go unintercepted, na tungeishia kuamini uvumbuzi huo feki!
    ....."For some 40 years, they were the subject of many scientific papers, analyses and reconstructions. Some 500 academics from various universities all over the world prepared doctoral theses on the subject of Piltdown Man.(1)"
    ...Sasa na hawa madoctor feki waliozalishwa kwa kutumia hizi theses, how do we rate them?
     
  3. X-PASTER

    X-PASTER Moderator

    #3
    May 3, 2010
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Messages: 11,651
    Likes Received: 75
    Trophy Points: 145
    Ndio hapo sasa, sijui watarudia tenakuandika upya Theses zao!
     
  4. M

    Mzee2000 JF-Expert Member

    #4
    May 3, 2010
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Messages: 471
    Likes Received: 28
    Trophy Points: 45
    Sasa hao waliofoji piltdown man walitaka wadanganye dunia kuwa binadamu aliaza England, kwamba wazungu ndio master race.Lakini sasa Elimu ya Genetics imehakiki asilimia 100% kwamba binadamu wa kwanza yaani Eve na Adam walianzia east afrika yaani
    Tanzania, Ethiopia na kenya na hakuwa mzungu, alikuwa mwafrika. Sasa hii fact imewaumiza sana wazungu, na ndio maana, they dont talk about the superiority of the white race,because they know the big daddy, was a black man.

    The white man started existing around 20,000 years ago. Sasa kwa kuwa historia ya homosapiens, yaani binadamu kama sisi ilianza miaka 200,000 iliyopita,maana yake ni kwamba in 90% of the history of mankind, the white man did not exist! Hence you seee the need to doctor evidence.

    Fundisho: Usikubali kila kitu unachoambiwa na wataalamu, chunguza kwanza, look at primary evidence before you accept anything!!
     
Loading...