Mtazamaji
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 29, 2008
- 5,937
- 1,437
It has often been thought wise to substitute the term developing for underdeveloped. One of the reasons for so doing is to avoid any unpleasantness which may be attached to the second term, which might be interpreted as meaning underdeveloped mentally, physically, morally or in any other respect. Actually, if underdevelopment were related to anything other than comparing economies, then the most underdeveloped country in the world would be the U.S.A, which practices external oppression on a massive scale, while internally there is a blend of exploitation, brutality, and psychiatric disorder. However, on the economic level, it is best to remain with the word underdeveloped rather than developing, because the latter creates the impression that all the countries of Africa are escaping from a state of economic backwardness relative to the industrial nations of the world, and that they are emancipating themselves from the relationship of exploitation. That is certainly not true, and many underdeveloped countries in Africa and elsewhere are becoming more underdeveloped in comparison with the worlds great powers, because their exploitation by the metropoles is being intensified in new ways.
source http://www.marxists.org/subject/africa/rodney-walter/how-europe/ch01.htm#s2
Tunadanganywa kama watoto kukubali kuitwa nchi inayoendelea.Ni wizi kwa manufaa ya mafisadi ya ndani wetu na mabepari wa nje