Changamoto2015
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 1, 2012
- 773
- 313
Fees for Class A permits (for the self-employed) now range between US$2,000 and US$3,000, up from around US$2,000 on average previously. The hardest hit are foreign workers who fall in the A-1, A-2 or A-3 categories (prospecting and mining; largescale trade and businesses; lawyers, accountants and doctors), who will have to pay up to US$3,000-the highest rate for any type of permit in the EAC.
The average fee for Class B permits (for foreigners employed by a Tanzanian firm) has increased by 33% to around
US$2,000. Finally, Class C permit-holders (including students, researchers, volunteers, people attending court cases
and former residents) will now have to start paying US$200-US$500. The duration of permits will continue to depend
on the type of work and the total period of stay, but is usually around two years.
The fee revisions follow major increases in July 2011, under which the cost of Class A permits was raised by an
average of 25% and Class B permits by an average of 250%. The increases are likely to have a significant adverse
impact on businesses given the continued domestic shortage of skilled labour.
The increase in work-permit fees also comes two years after Tanzania signed the EAC Common Market Protocol,
which, among other things, sought to facilitate the free movement of labour within the customs union. Tanzania has
continued to put up barriers to this by making use of a clause in the protocol that allows member states to make rights of immigration, establishment and access to land subject to national laws. Uganda and Burundi similarly have yet to open up their labour markets to the rest of the EAC.
The implementation of the Common Market Protocol seemed to be heading in the right direction, with Rwanda and
Kenya abolishing their permit fees for EAC citizens in 2008 and 2010 respectively. However, in July 2012 Kenya
introduced a new restriction on immigrants in an effort to decrease youth unemployment; work permits will now only
be granted to foreigners (including EAC citizens) over the age of 35 and who earn more than US$24,000 a year.
Tanzania's latest move represents yet another move away from closer EAC integration and serves as a reminder that
the Common Market Protocol remains to be fully implemented.
Source: European Intelligence Unit Report(September 2012)
The average fee for Class B permits (for foreigners employed by a Tanzanian firm) has increased by 33% to around
US$2,000. Finally, Class C permit-holders (including students, researchers, volunteers, people attending court cases
and former residents) will now have to start paying US$200-US$500. The duration of permits will continue to depend
on the type of work and the total period of stay, but is usually around two years.
The fee revisions follow major increases in July 2011, under which the cost of Class A permits was raised by an
average of 25% and Class B permits by an average of 250%. The increases are likely to have a significant adverse
impact on businesses given the continued domestic shortage of skilled labour.
The increase in work-permit fees also comes two years after Tanzania signed the EAC Common Market Protocol,
which, among other things, sought to facilitate the free movement of labour within the customs union. Tanzania has
continued to put up barriers to this by making use of a clause in the protocol that allows member states to make rights of immigration, establishment and access to land subject to national laws. Uganda and Burundi similarly have yet to open up their labour markets to the rest of the EAC.
The implementation of the Common Market Protocol seemed to be heading in the right direction, with Rwanda and
Kenya abolishing their permit fees for EAC citizens in 2008 and 2010 respectively. However, in July 2012 Kenya
introduced a new restriction on immigrants in an effort to decrease youth unemployment; work permits will now only
be granted to foreigners (including EAC citizens) over the age of 35 and who earn more than US$24,000 a year.
Tanzania's latest move represents yet another move away from closer EAC integration and serves as a reminder that
the Common Market Protocol remains to be fully implemented.
Source: European Intelligence Unit Report(September 2012)