Ulidhani Botswana ni sawa na Tanzania?
Us sio signarory wa mkataba wa Rome,so hapo kwa ICC ni irrelevant
Botswanas Foreign Affairs minister Phandu Skelemani has made a U-turn on his ban on President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta, saying he is free to visit as he is innocent until proven guilty.
Mr Skelemani had earlier told the countrys daily Mmegi Mr Kenyatta must not set foot in his country if he refuses to cooperate with the International Criminal Court (ICC).
This is to retract my earlier statement about the President-elect of Kenya. Mr Uhuru Kenyatta is more than welcome to visit Botswana.
Botswana is cognisant of a section of the law that says one is innocent until proven guilty, he said in a statement.
Mr Kenyatta is facing charges of crimes against humanity related to the 2008 post-election violence in which more than 1,000 people died.
His alleged co-perpetrators, Maj-Gen (rtd) Hussein Ali and former Head of Public Service Francis Muthaura have been let of the hook for lack of evidence.
Mr Skelemanis statement further said he appreciated Mr Kenyattas compliance with the ICC since the beginning of the hearings.
I apologise to the Kenyan people for my earlier statement and wish to maintain that Kenya and Botswana have always worked together and nothing will change that, he said.
Mr Skelemani wished Mr Kenyatta all the best in the new responsibility of governing Kenya.
Earlier, Kenya had described as contemptuous Mr Skelemanis statement.
Government Spokesman Muthui Kariuki told the Nation that Kenya, like Botswana, is a signatory to the Rome Statute and will continue to undertake its obligations but will not be bullied.
The government finds the statement contemptuous. We know what is required of us and will continue to respect that position, he said.
Mr Kenyatta has been accused, but he is not guilty until proven otherwise. In fact, he has always attended ICC sessions without failure and is on record he would continue to do so, Mr Kariuki said.
Botswana minister makes Uhuru ICC U-turn - Africa - nation.co.ke
Nilisema hapa kwamba kafanya "a rookie mistake". Sasa kakubali mwenyewe na kuomba radhi.
Ushamsikia Membe akiomba radhi? Mie sikumbuki. Hata baada ya kusema ana hakika na nyendo zote za wafanyakazi wote wa serikali ya Tanzania, a farce of quixotic burlesque.
Serikali ya Botswana ina cha kutufundisha hata pale inapokosea.
Na wewe pia ungejua jibu la swali nililouliza ungejibu badala ya kuuliza swali pia..now be a man and answer this: what does Botswana supply to kenya that it cant live without?!?
Whether or not there is such a supply, does it real matter?
Nilisema hapa kwamba kafanya "a rookie mistake". Sasa kakubali mwenyewe na kuomba radhi.
Well, may be it doesn't...so it doesn't matter whether Uhuru gets allowed to visit Botswana or not..and therefore the tswanas should quit whining
Amesema kuwa hajawahi kuomba msamaha: https://www.jamiiforums.com/kenyan-...-i-never-apologised-to-the-govt-of-kenya.html
The Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Phandu Skelemani, yesterday denied media claims that he had apologised to the government of Kenya for comments he made to Mmegi about that country's President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta and his International Criminal Court (ICC) case. "I have nothing to apologise for," he said.
Skelemani related how a certain Kenyan named Muriti had called him after the Mmegi report in which he asserted that Kenyatta should not set foot in Botswana if he does not cooperate with the ICC. Speaking fluent Setswana, Muriti asked Skelemani to apologise. "I told him that I was not apologising," Skelemani said.
He added that Muriti claimed to work in Kenyatta's office. "I have never spoken to the foreign press about Kenyatta," he insisted. "I wonder where the claim that I have apologised comes from".The Kenyan Daily Post first reported yesterday that the minister had apologised to the people of Kenya. Mmegi, along with other international news outlets such as the BBC, further reproduced the "official apology" that the Kenyan newspaper attributed to Skelemani.
Meanwhile, government issued a statement yesterday "to clarify a recent statement attributed to the Minister Phandu Skelemani on the question of the ICC and its processes".The government said the minister's statement relating to a hypothetical visit to Botswana by Kenya's President-elect was aimed at merely explaining the rules of the ICC and obligations of members of the court. "In this context, he indicated that as can be expected, any member of the court is bound by its rules," the statement said.
"Equally important is that all members of the court are obliged to uphold its rules, a principle that impels any member, including Botswana, to act to fulfill its obligations under the rules of the court." The government noted that Skelemani had indicated that the parties involved had not only pledged cooperation but had always cooperated with the ICC. "In other words, the Kenyan situation does not fall within the above scenario dealing with non-compliance with the court," the statement continued.
"Botswana, as a member of the ICC, will only act in accordance with the decisions of the court. "At the moment, no decision has been made on the Kenyan situation that would require Botswana to act. The strength of Botswana-Kenya relations is reflected in the long history of wide ranging cooperation between the two countries, as well as the fact that the two countries have resident missions in each other's capitals."
Source: Mmegi Online :: I never apologised - Skelemani