Gaijin
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 21, 2007
- 11,812
- 5,284
MTM or EMT? LOL
Zote herufi tatu na zote zina M na T...hahha
My bad, ni EMT
MTM or EMT? LOL
@ AJ.... Dah! Will be back broda!
Hapo kwenye red, kwa hiyo kile kitendo cha chui kwenye video hapo juu kilikuwa sio cha "ufahamu muhimu" kwa sababu "ufahamu muhimu" haupatikani kwa wanyama? Unafikiri wanyama hawana ufahamu?
Kwa kuongezea suali la MTM hapo, huo ufahamu maalum tunaupimaje?
You mean Utu wa mtu ni Watu?UTU- humanity, human nature.:eyebrows:Tunatambua usemi wa waswahili Utu wa Mtu ni utu.Kwa maana hiyo jamii ndiyo inasema nini ni human nature
Dah huu uzi bado upo active?
Ngoja niupite nione kama tafsiri ya utu imepatikana
paulss, hakuna mpinzani!!:nono::nono:Wakuu baada ya miezi kadhaa ya kudadafua tafsiri ya neneo UTU je hii ndio tafsiri iliyopatikana? au hii ni conclusion ya Azimio Jipya tu
Naona kama tafsiri hii haijashiba uzuri
Umm... So you know of studies that have been conducted about the way humans and animals react to stressful conditions and you are going to tell us about them, is that what you are saying?
Could you also define what you mean with "completeness"? Based on the way you use it, it's just not very clear (to me at least).
Its not that simple, the deep studies are complicated for this forum Roulette will agree with me ...
So, I'll recapitulate again:
At first, utu was: "the ability to deliberately reduce negative emotions and promote the positive ones (to other people's benefit)."
Technically speaking in psychology suppression is always considered to be very detrimental and it is never encouraged to anyone to undergo that process! So in the statement above you should bare in mind that "reduce" should not be used to mean Suppress! But simply is being without negative emotions. Thus, This makes the above statement to have the same meaning as the following one,
Based on what you said in your penultimate post, utu was: "the ability to neither produce nor suppress negative emotions."
When you give the above statement the originality, you end up with the following statement, with exactly the same meaning.
And now it seems to have become: "the ability to not produce negative emotions in association with a specific object."
The above statement does not differ from the previous ones, taking into consideration that you have the understanding that all negative emotions are directly related to a specific object, that is all negative emotions has a specific CAUSE and they are the EFFECTS from that cause! All negative emotions are the products of RE ACTION from some specific object, situations or event etc. It is true that this was not indicated in all the above statements, which of course came from different nature of the on going discussion
I gave you some links which indicates several spheres of researchers working hard to understand and overcome negative emotions for the better healthy, working place, well established family, business, performance at schools etc and they come up with the term Emotional intelligence, as the way to manage the negative emotions .