Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Here's how ruling party can control Tanzania till 2031

Discussion in 'Uchaguzi Tanzania' started by Njowepo, Nov 3, 2010.

  1. Njowepo

    Njowepo JF-Expert Member

    #1
    Nov 3, 2010
    Joined: Feb 26, 2008
    Messages: 9,180
    Likes Received: 298
    Trophy Points: 180
    By Charles Onyango-Obbo
    Send Cancel

    Bottom of Form

    Posted Monday, November 1 2010 at 12:33
    The votes in Tanzania’s October 31 election were counted well before the vote, according to critics and cynics.
    For that reason, victory by the ruling Chama cha Mapinduzi (CCM or Party of the Revolution) and a second term for President Jakaya Kikwete, were assured long ago.
    True, CCM has a reputation as a vote-stealing party. However, the bad news for those who want to see the reign of CCM and such long-ruling parties end, is that the longer they stay in power, the longer they are able to stay in power.
    Take Mexico’s Institutional Revo-lutionary Party ( PRI), which ruled the country for 70 years from 1929 to December 2009, when it lost power to Vicente Fox’s National Action Party. The PRI was a CCM-type party, complete with a reputation for corruption and vote-fiddling.
    However, it renewed itself constantly through internal leadership changes. In its 70-year rule, it had a record 42 party presidents, meaning each of them led the party for an average of 1.6 years.
    It also offered up 14 national presidents, so the average term of a Mexican president during the PRI days was five years.
    We see the same pattern in Botswana, which has been ruled by the Botswana Democratic Party and presidents elected in free elections since Independence in 1966. It has had four presidents. Thus Botswana’s big men stay in State House for an average of 11 years.
    Now, take CCM. From Independence in 1961, when it was the Tanganyika African National Union, Kikwete is its fourth leader. Though my man Julius Nyerere hogged power for 24 years, the average presidential rule in Tanzania is 12.3 years.
    The problem for these behemoth parties comes when they fail to circulate internal leaders quickly. By 2002, when Kanu lost elections in Kenya, it had been in power for 38 years and had only two presidents, thus an average of 19 years at that time. Compare that to PRI. The Kenyan party’s decay can partly be attributed to that.
    For that reason, the future cannot be bright for politicians in Uganda’s National Resistance Movement.
    President Yoweri Museveni has been firmly perched as its leader for 28 years. And he has been national president for 24 years.
    If CCM follows the PRI’s route, then it stay in power until at least 2031!
    The biggest risk that these long-ruling parties face is implosion from internal power struggles. The PRI was weakened after its left wing broke off to form the Party of the Democratic Revolution in 1989.

    In Kenya, Kanu’s demise was all but guaranteed after its “progressive” wing broke off in late 2002 to join President Mwai Kibaki in the opposition, and to form the National Rainbow Coalition that went on to win the polls.
    My own sense is that CCM’s internal tensions are playing out differently, with the reformists looking to seize control of it and to worm their way into influential state positions, not to jump ship and form different parties.
    Which is why party feuds can be counterproductive, because sometimes parties reinvent themselves in the process, and thus become appealing to voters again.
    SOURCE:THE EAST AFRICAN
     
  2. A

    A Lady Senior Member

    #2
    Nov 3, 2010
    Joined: Apr 28, 2009
    Messages: 103
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    If this theory (GOD forbid) is true by that time Tanzania will be beyond poverty!
     
  3. Njowepo

    Njowepo JF-Expert Member

    #3
    Nov 3, 2010
    Joined: Feb 26, 2008
    Messages: 9,180
    Likes Received: 298
    Trophy Points: 180
    Let us cut short the theory for us it should be 2015
     
  4. Lasikoki

    Lasikoki JF-Expert Member

    #4
    Nov 3, 2010
    Joined: Jan 10, 2010
    Messages: 642
    Likes Received: 3
    Trophy Points: 0
    ''beyond poverty''. This is too good 2 b true
     
  5. The Dreamer

    The Dreamer JF-Expert Member

    #5
    Nov 3, 2010
    Joined: Feb 2, 2009
    Messages: 1,280
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    While I concur with most of what you have written, I vehemently differ from you on the point of legitimacy of the votes from the current election. CCM never cheat during counting. They only time they manipulate "numbers" is during compilation of results. For instance they have introduced this computer based system, imagine what happens when instead of entering 120 in the datasheet one intentionally enters 1200! One thousand free votes in favour of the ruling party! If that is replicated three times in a very tight election the opponent will lose!

    As for the short duration of leaders in office, I am not conviced at all. Hussein Mburak, Gadhaf, etc. have been in power for so long and no hope of change! I think it is important that people know their civic rights and that is it
     
Loading...