Labda nikupe homework kwanza Jumatatu ukija hapa umepata kuelewa kidogo.
Kuna hizi aya nyingine.
1 Chronicles 16:30: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable."
Psalm 93:1: "Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ..."
Psalm 96:10: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ..."
Psalm 104:5: "Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken."
Hivi unasoma wenzako wanachoandika au unakurupuka tu?Maswali anayo yakimbia darwin mjuwaji na bluray:
SWALI LA KWANZA:
'At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.- C Darwin.
How far are we in this darwin mjuwaji?
[SWALI LA PILI:
Affirmative question kwa darwin mjuwaji:
Why did the Greek use the word GONIA instead and place of PAIOH?
You can cite the whole bible from front to end and backwards, upside down or inside out, but that does not alter the simple fact that it is only a human artefact, produced by fallible men about the hearsay of hearsay of hearsay that someone said that god might have said. [hadithi za popobawa]
Without any trace of evidence that it was god or the devil or just hallucination.
Unless of course, you can show me a bible (or any 'holy' scripture for that matter) that has been created without any interference of man and doubtlessly can be ascribed to god and no other.
Hivi unasoma wenzako wanachoandika au unakurupuka tu?
Bluray alishawahi kusema wanasayansi wako tayari kupewa challenge na mtu yeyote. na kama liko kosa wanalirekebisha.
Niambie kilichowafanya watu wa deen wamuombe msamaha Darwin?
Walitumia GONIA kuficha makosa ya Ezekiel, Isaiah na Job ambao ndio walioleta hizo aya za 4 corners.
Ndio maana nikakuambia siku za mwanzo kwamba
Kama nikikuuliza Ezekiel, Isaiah na Job utaifa wao huujui.
MWISHO KABISA NAREJEA:
KILICHOFANYA KANISA LIMUOMBE MSAMAHA DARWIN NI NINI?
Bado hujajibu swali.
Why did the Greek use the word GONIA instead and place of PAIOH?
Walitumia GONIA kuficha makosa ya Ezekiel, Isaiah na Job ambao ndio walioleta hizo aya za 4 corners.
Kama nikikuuliza Ezekiel, Isaiah na Job utaifa wao huujui.
I used Hebrew to address the issues of FOUR CORNERS AND NOT GREEK as fully explained hereunder:Mr Darwin alijibu haya hapa chini, au unahitaji mawani!?
Hivi unasoma wenzako wanachoandika au unakurupuka tu?
Bluray alishawahi kusema wanasayansi wako tayari kupewa challenge na mtu yeyote. na kama liko kosa wanalirekebisha.
Hahah ahaha ahaha a, nilifikiri tunazungumza filosofia ya darwin, sasa unaleta udini. Kaazi kweli kweli.
Ndugu yako darwin anaendelea kudai kuwa eti Waafrika na Wa-India WANA AKILI NDOGO, kuliko ya Myama Pori.
It is amazing to see that the CEO of CITI BANK ni Mhindi, na Rais wa US of A ni Mwafrika, kweli, theorems za evolution zimepitwa na wakati.
I used Hebrew to address the issues of FOUR CORNERS AND NOT GREEK as fully explained hereunder:
The phrase, "the four corners of the earth." Kutoka Original translation ya Biblia, neno corners katika Kiebrania ni, KANAPH. Kanaph is translated in a variety of ways. However, it generally means extremity na/au the greatest or utmost degree.
Is there any Greek word up there? Nah...
Back to my question, why didn't the Greek Bible use the word PAIOH which is a closer word to KANAPH-Hebrew?
You can cite the whole bible from front to end and backwards, upside down or inside out, but that does not alter the simple fact that it is only a human artefact, produced by fallible men about the hearsay of hearsay of hearsay that someone said that god might have said. [hadithi za popobawa]
Without any trace of evidence that it was god or the devil or just hallucination.
Unless of course, you can show me a bible (or any 'holy' scripture for that matter) that has been created without any interference of man and doubtlessly can be ascribed to god and no other.
"At some future period (Darwin writes), not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes ... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest Allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla." (Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man 2nd ed (New York: A. L. Burt Co., I 874), p. 17.
Are you telling me that darwin was a distrustfull thinker, inter-alia, his theorems are incertitude and/or misgiving, mistrustfulness and full of skepticism and incredulity with compunction, and qualm and/or scruple? Is that what you are telling me now?
Charles Darwin to receive apology from the Church of England for rejecting evolution
The Church of England is to apologise to Charles Darwin for its initial rejection of his theories, nearly 150 years after he published his most famous work.
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent
Published: 6:08PM BST 13 Sep 2008
Sections of Church likely to be dismayed by Darwin move
The Church of England will concede in a statement that it was over-defensive and over-emotional in dismissing Darwin's ideas. It will call "anti-evolutionary fervour" an "indictment" on the Church".
The bold move is certain to dismay sections of the Church that believe in creationism and regard Darwin's views as directly opposed to traditional Christian teaching.
Related Articles
Humans evolved from tree dwelling apes rather than knuckle draggers The apology, which has been written by the Rev Dr Malcolm Brown, the Church's director of mission and public affairs, says that Christians, in their response to Darwin's theory of natural selection, repeated the mistakes they made in doubting Galileo's astronomy in the 17th century.
"The statement will read: Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still. We try to practise the old virtues of 'faith seeking understanding' and hope that makes some amends."
Opposition to evolutionary theories is still "a litmus test of faithfulness" for some Christian movements, the Church will admit. It will say that such attitudes owe much to a fear of perceived threats to Christianity.
The comments are included on a Church of England website promoting the views of Charles Darwin to be launched on Monday.
Naona umeishiwa sasa, unakopi hata mawazo ya wenzako.
Kopi tu mpaka mwisho halafu mimi nitaleta copy zako.
Jambo moja mpaka sasa unalikwepa ni hili.
Utazidi kukopi nakupaste lakini wala hakuna ujanja wowote.
Kwanza kopi zako zinazotoka hapa.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c017.html
Nikirudi kwenye swali lako ambalo linakuvaa mwenyewe na ambalo nimelishalijibu.
Kurejea: Hawakulitumia hilo neno kwasababu waliona kwamba Ezekiel, Isaiah na Job walivyoilezea dunia waliielezea kimakosa.
Kwakuongeza zaidi kama nilivyoandika mwanzo
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha, kazi ipo hapo! hata watu maarufu waliowengi duniani ni 'blacks' na pirates wakubwa ni 'wahindi'
where is Darwin? I bet you come back and see for yourself what is happening on this earth!!
Mtu yeyote aliye enda Bible school lazima atumie Hebrew au Greek katika reference. Wewe si uwa unaweka refe za darwin, sasa huko ni kukopi?
Tumia akili unapojibu maswali na sio hysteria. Hilo ni tatizo kubwa sana la nyie wafuasi wa darwin. Hysteria, lol
Mtu yeyote aliye enda Bible school lazima atumie Hebrew au Greek katika reference.
Darwin katangulia kwa muumba wake kujibu maswali!
Hahaaa a a , thanks anyway.
Charles Darwin to receive apology from the Church of England for rejecting evolution
The Church of England is to apologise to Charles Darwin for its initial rejection of his theories, nearly 150 years after he published his most famous work.
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent
Published: 6:08PM BST 13 Sep 2008
Sections of Church likely to be dismayed by Darwin move
The Church of England will concede in a statement that it was over-defensive and over-emotional in dismissing Darwin's ideas. It will call "anti-evolutionary fervour" an "indictment" on the Church".
The bold move is certain to dismay sections of the Church that believe in creationism and regard Darwin's views as directly opposed to traditional Christian teaching.
Related Articles
Humans evolved from tree dwelling apes rather than knuckle draggers The apology, which has been written by the Rev Dr Malcolm Brown, the Church's director of mission and public affairs, says that Christians, in their response to Darwin's theory of natural selection, repeated the mistakes they made in doubting Galileo's astronomy in the 17th century.
"The statement will read: Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still. We try to practise the old virtues of 'faith seeking understanding' and hope that makes some amends."
Opposition to evolutionary theories is still "a litmus test of faithfulness" for some Christian movements, the Church will admit. It will say that such attitudes owe much to a fear of perceived threats to Christianity.
The comments are included on a Church of England website promoting the views of Charles Darwin to be launched on Monday.
Maswali anayo yakimbia darwin mjuwaji na bluray:
SWALI LA KWANZA:
'At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.- C Darwin.
How far are we in this darwin mjuwaji?
SWALI LA PILI:
Affirmative question kwa darwin mjuwaji:
Why did the Greek use the word GONIA instead and place of PAIOH?