Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Apple awarded $1bn in damages from Samsung in US court

Discussion in 'Tech, Gadgets & Science Forum' started by Ozzie, Aug 25, 2012.

  1. Ozzie

    Ozzie JF-Expert Member

    #1
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: Oct 9, 2007
    Messages: 3,236
    Likes Received: 16
    Trophy Points: 135
    A US court has ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m) in damages for infringing intellectual property.
    The jury decided several Samsung devices had infringed iPhone-maker Apple's software and design patents, but rejected counter-claims by Samsung.
    Apple will now seek import bans on several of its rival's products. Samsung has said it will appeal.
    Correspondents say the ruling is one of the most significant in a global battle over patents and intellectual property.
    In recent weeks, a court in South Korea ruled that both technology firms had copied each other, while a British court threw out claims by the US company that Samsung had infringed its copyright.
    But the year-long US case has involved some of the biggest damages claims, and is likely to shape the way patent licences are handled in the future.
    'Monopoly' gibe
    Samsung promised to appeal against the decision describing it as "a loss for the American consumer".
    "It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices," the South Korean firm said.
    The statement added that it was "unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners".
    Apple, however, said it applauded the court "for finding Samsung's behaviour wilful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn't right".
    Apple said it intended to seek sales injunctions at a follow-up hearing on 20 September
    The two firms account for more than half of global smartphone and tablet computer sales.
    The nine-person jury at the federal court in San Jose, California had to consider 700 questions about each side's claim that its rival had infringed its intellectual property.
    It deliberated for less than three days before coming to a unanimous decision, rejecting all of Samsung's claims and upholding five of Apple's allegations, including:

    • Some of Samsung's handsets, including its Galaxy S 4G model, infringed Apple's design patents for the look of its iPhone including the system it uses to display text and icons
    • All the disputed Samsung devices had copied Apple's "bounce-back response", which makes lists jump back as if yanked by a rubber band
    • Several Samsung devices incorporated Apple's facility allowing users to zoom into text with a tap of a finger
    Apple had wanted $2.5bn in damages. Samsung had sought $519m.
    'Social cost'
    Michael Gartenburg, research director at Gartner, told the BBC it could be a good thing for consumers in the long run because it would force Apple's competitors to innovate.
    "Anyone who was even thinking about borrowing a technology or design from Apple will think twice about it now," he said.
    Other analysts point out that Apple could be the overall loser because the court case has helped boost Samsung's profile.
    Also, the South Korean firm has already brought out a new generation of products that should avoid the patent issues.
    However, Christopher Marlett of investment bank MDB Capital Group said there was a "social cost" for Samsung.
    "As a company, you don't want to be known as someone who steals from someone else," he said.
    Apple remains one of the South Korean company's biggest customers buying computer chips and, reportedly, screens.

    Source: BBC News - Apple awarded $1bn in damages from Samsung in US court

     
  2. Achahasira

    Achahasira JF-Expert Member

    #2
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: Mar 9, 2011
    Messages: 1,220
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    yaani apple kashinda kesi zote ambazo samsung kadai?

    naona kama kuna utaifa hapa maana kesi ikiwa USA basi apple anakuwa juu.
     
  3. Kiranga

    Kiranga JF-Expert Member

    #3
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: Jan 29, 2009
    Messages: 34,583
    Likes Received: 5,639
    Trophy Points: 280
    Apple wame patent mpaka rectange with round corners sasa. Daang.
     
  4. Njowepo

    Njowepo JF-Expert Member

    #4
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: Feb 26, 2008
    Messages: 9,180
    Likes Received: 298
    Trophy Points: 180
    Ila hawa sumsung nao wamezidi hii galaxy wameitohoa kama ilivyo toka kwa apple's products
    hii twaiita inovation through copying
     
  5. Chief-Mkwawa

    Chief-Mkwawa Platinum Member

    #5
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: May 25, 2011
    Messages: 14,027
    Likes Received: 2,854
    Trophy Points: 280
    Mi siwapendi wote lakini ukiziangalia tu zile simu unajua nani ana makosa hata wewe ungekua jaji ungetoa same hukumu.
     
  6. Chief-Mkwawa

    Chief-Mkwawa Platinum Member

    #6
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: May 25, 2011
    Messages: 14,027
    Likes Received: 2,854
    Trophy Points: 280
    Kipindi iphone ya kwanza inatoka nokia alimpeleka mahkaman iphone kwa hio ishu lakin alishindwa leo mambo yamekua vice versa express music s60v5 ndo za kwanza kua na round corner rectangle
     
  7. Achahasira

    Achahasira JF-Expert Member

    #7
    Aug 25, 2012
    Joined: Mar 9, 2011
    Messages: 1,220
    Likes Received: 0
    Trophy Points: 0
    samsung ameiga sana ata apple ameiga kwa nokia na lg,lkn naona hatua ya apple kupeleka ishu mahakamani ni kwasababu za vitisho vya samsung katika soko.
     
Loading...