Pundit
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 4, 2007
- 3,733
- 123
Original post called for Kikwete's resignation because of performance. You questioned whether leaders are being criticized regardless of performance. Then you were asked whether you are wondering that Kikwete is performing well. And your response is you are questioning whether the original post was imaginary.
Unless you think that Kikwete may be performing well, then you can not wonder whether the original post calling for Kikwete's resignation was made regardless of perfomance. Ok!
I do not mind where you stand, I just have more respect for a man who let's me know where he stands. So, stand up an be counted!
One more time. Since the original post is blasting Kikwete's performance, and you are questioning whether that criticism was made regardless of performance, are you allowing the possibilty that Kikwete is performing well?
Noble Knight,
I prefaced my post with
Not in the least defending Kikwete, neither tempted to participate in this noble -if quixotic- gesture.
Was the significance of this statement wasted on you?
I questioned the objectivity of a literate electorate.Labour is in deep problems in the UK, partly because they have been in power for too long.I was questioning whether literate societies grow tired of whatever the person in power is, this does not have to mean that Kikwete is performing.
I also went ahead and lambasted the oversimplifying of issues by calling for resignations as stated above.
I do not see a contradiction or boggling complexity, unless one track only is used in the capacities of the reader's faculties.